跨境电商发展对家庭返贫风险的影响——基于CFPS的经验证据
Cross-Border E-Commerce Development and Household Poverty-Return Risk: Empirical Evidence from CFPS
摘要: 跨境电商作为数字贸易的重要形态,在拓展市场机会、促进经济活动的同时,也可能通过劳动力市场调整对不同家庭产生差异化影响。本文基于2014~2022年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据,采用固定效应模型考察跨境电商发展对家庭返贫风险的影响及其作用机制。研究结果表明,跨境电商发展显著提高了家庭未来返贫风险,该结论在一系列稳健性检验后依然成立。异质性分析表明,跨境电商发展的风险效应在农业户口、大规模家庭及低人力资本家庭中更为明显。进一步机制分析表明,跨境电商发展通过提高最低工资标准影响家庭返贫风险,劳动力市场调整可能成为跨境电商影响家庭返贫风险的重要传导渠道。研究结果表明,跨境电商带来的发展机会并非所有家庭均能充分分享,风险承受能力较弱的家庭可能更容易受到其伴随的劳动力市场调整影响。
Abstract: As an important form of digital trade, cross-border e-commerce expands market opportunities and promotes economic activity, but it may also exert heterogeneous effects on different households through labor market adjustments. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) for 2014~2022, this paper employs a fixed effects model to examine the impact of cross-border e-commerce development on household poverty-return risk and its underlying mechanisms. The results show that cross-border e-commerce development significantly increases households’ future poverty-return risk, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness checks. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the risk effect of cross-border e-commerce development is more pronounced among households with agricultural household registration, large household size, and low human capital. Further mechanism analysis reveals that cross-border e-commerce development affects household poverty-return risk by raising the minimum wage standard, suggesting that labor market adjustment may serve as an important transmission channel through which cross-border e-commerce influences household poverty-return risk. These findings indicate that the development opportunities brought by cross-border e-commerce are not fully shared by all households, and households with weaker risk-bearing capacity may be more vulnerable to the accompanying labor market adjustments.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张鹏, 吴明朗, 张翔. 家庭财政转移支付如何有效阻止脱贫家庭重返贫困——基于多维返贫测量视角[J]. 农业技术经济, 2022(6): 61-76.
|
|
[2]
|
陈东, 郭文光. 数字化转型如何影响劳动技能溢价——基于A股上市公司数据的经验研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(3): 173-192.
|
|
[3]
|
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. SAGE, 53-74.
|
|
[4]
|
Levin-Waldman, O.M. (2000) The Effects of the Minimum Wage: A Business Response. Journal of Economic Issues, 34, 723-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2000.11506303
|
|
[5]
|
Bane, M.J. and Ellwood, D.T. (1986) Slipping into and out of Poverty: The Dynamics of Spells. The Journal of Human Resources, 21, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/145955
|
|
[6]
|
Dong, Y., Jin, G., Deng, X. and Wu, F. (2021) Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty and Its Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in China from the Perspective of Development Geography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31, 130-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1836-x
|
|
[7]
|
Hamilton, R., Bach, M., Heinrich, S.P., Hoffmann, M.B., Odom, J.V., McCulloch, D.L., et al. (2020) VEP Estimation of Visual Acuity: A Systematic Review. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 142, 25-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-020-09770-3
|
|
[8]
|
郭露, 刘梨进. 农民合作社、贫困脆弱性与贫困阻断[J]. 农业技术经济, 2023(6): 129-144.
|
|
[9]
|
Gallardo, M. (2018) Identifying Vulnerability to Poverty: A Critical Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32, 1074-1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12216
|
|
[10]
|
袁航. 智能制造与企业劳动收入份额[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2026(6): 96-112.
|
|
[11]
|
王汉杰. 数字素养与农户收入: 兼论数字不平等的形成[J]. 中国农村经济, 2024(3): 86-106.
|
|
[12]
|
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
|