“交通强国”战略融入《交通规划》课程——思政示范课建设的路径与实践
Integrating the “Transport Power” Strategy into the “Transportation Planning” Course—Pathways and Practice for Developing an Ideological and Political Demonstration Course
摘要: 围绕“交通强国”战略对新时代交通运输人才培养提出的新要求,本文以《交通规划》课程为载体,探索课程思政示范课建设的实践路径。通过系统梳理交通强国战略的核心内涵,挖掘课程内容与国家战略的契合点,构建了“一核双驱三维度”的示范课建设体系。从教学内容重构、教学方法创新、实践教学拓展、评价机制改革四个方面,详细阐述了战略融入的具体做法。教学实践表明,该模式有效增强了学生的专业认同感和历史使命感,提升了学生服务国家战略的自觉性,为同类工科课程思政示范课建设提供了参考。研究进一步梳理了体系与情境学习理论、成果导向教育理念的对应关系,给出了可用于记录与比对育人成效的评价量规,并在结论部分讨论了单一案例研究的局限、可迁移的核心原则以及面向不同类型院校的调适建议。
Abstract: Focusing on the new requirements imposed by the “Transport Power” strategy for cultivating transportation talents in the new era, this paper takes the “Transportation Planning” course as a vehicle to explore practical pathways for developing an ideological and political demonstration course. By systematically reviewing the core connotation of the Transport Power strategy and identifying the alignment between course content and national strategy, a “one core, dual drivers, three dimensions” demonstration course framework is constructed. The paper elaborates on specific implementation approaches from four aspects: curriculum content reconstruction, teaching method innovation, practical teaching expansion, and evaluation mechanism reform. Teaching practice shows that this model has effectively strengthened students’ professional identity and historical mission, enhanced their consciousness of serving national strategies, and provides a reference for ideological and political demonstration course development in similar engineering programs. The paper further clarifies the theoretical underpinnings of the framework in relation to situated learning and outcome-based education, provides a rubric for recording and comparing value-guidance outcomes, and discusses the limitations of a single-case design together with transferable principles and adaptation strategies for different types of institutions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中共中央 国务院印发《交通强国建设纲要》[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-09/19/content_5431432.htm, 2019-09-19.
|
|
[2]
|
教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html, 2020-05-28.
|
|
[3]
|
闫星臣, 姜晓红, 余伟, 张永强. 《运输系统规划与设计》课程思政建设路径、思政矩阵与教学案例设计[J]. 物流科技, 2022, 45(17): 166-168.
|
|
[4]
|
陈沿伊, 柯姜岑, 王磊. 基于“133333”理念的“交通运输规划”课程思政教学设计与实践研究[J]. 黑龙江教育(理论与实践), 2024(8): 90-93.
|
|
[5]
|
龚迪嘉. 城乡规划交通学课程教学模式创新与思政元素融合[J]. 物流科技, 2023, 46(13): 151-155.
|
|
[6]
|
王炜. 交通规划[M]. 第3版. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2024.
|
|
[7]
|
王炜, 陈俊, 过秀成. 交通工程学[M]. 第3版. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2019.
|
|
[8]
|
宛岩. 基于PBL理念的“交通设计”课程思政四段体验式教学模式探索[J]. 宁波工程学院学报, 2022, 34(2): 117-121.
|
|
[9]
|
陈学文, 陈昕, 李刚. 交通运输类专业课程思政建设的教学探索与实践——以汽车安全辅助驾驶技术课程为例[J]. 辽宁工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(6): 117-120.
|
|
[10]
|
高德毅, 宗爱东. 课程思政: 有效发挥课堂育人主渠道作用的必然选择[J]. 思想理论教育导刊, 2017(1): 31-34.
|
|
[11]
|
Lave, J., Wenger, E. 情境学习: 合法的边缘性参与[M]. 王文静, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2004.
|
|
[12]
|
Spady, W.G. (1994) Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators.
|
|
[13]
|
李志义. 成果导向的教学设计[J]. 中国大学教学, 2015(3): 32-39.
|
|
[14]
|
Kelman, H.C. (1958) Compliance, Identification, and Internalization Three Processes of Attitude Change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
|
|
[15]
|
Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
|