眉山市干旱特征分析
Analysis of Drought Characteristics in Meishan
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2026.156122, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 查 婕, 李欣蔚, 赵 霞, 陈 宁:眉山市气象局气象服务中心,四川 眉山;肖 丹*:眉山市气象局气象服务中心,四川 眉山;高原与盆地暴雨旱涝灾害四川省重点实验室,四川 成都;胡 进:青神县气象局,四川 眉山
关键词: 干旱;夏旱;冬干;轻旱;干旱频次;Drought; Summer Drought; Winter Dryness; Mild Drought; Drought Frequency
摘要: 全球气候变暖背景下区域干旱灾害风险持续上升,眉山作为新时代“天府粮仓”首提地和四川核心粮食产区,分析其气象干旱演变规律对粮食安全防控具有重要意义。本文基于眉山市6个国家级气象站1966~2022年逐日降水观测数据,划分五类干旱和四个干旱等级,从降水时空分布、干旱与降水的响应关系,以及干旱频次、持续时间、强度等维度,系统分析了全市气象干旱特征。结果表明:(1) 眉山市降水呈西高东低空间格局,年内集中于5~9月,冬春枯水现象突出,年际变幅较大;(2) 年降水量与干旱频次呈显著负相关,但响应强度区域差异明显,以仁寿县相关性最强,洪雅县最弱;(3) 全市主导干旱类型为夏旱与冬干,干旱频次与持续时长呈“东高西低”分布,仁寿县、彭山区为高值区,洪雅县为低风险区;(4) 干旱等级以一般为主,较重及以上等级发生频率极低,但冬干中高强度干旱占比远高于其他季节,且东部县域更易发生重度、特重干旱。
Abstract: Against the background of global climate warming, regional drought disaster risk continues to rise. As the first-proposed site of the “Tianfu Granary” in the new era and a core grain-producing area in Sichuan, Meishan is of great significance to analyzethe evolution of meteorological drought for food security prevention and control. Based on daily precipitation observation data from six national meteorological stations in Meishan from 1966 to 2022, this study classified five types of drought and four drought levels, and systematically analyzed the characteristics of meteorological drought across the city from the perspectives of spatiotemporal precipitation distribution, the response relationship between drought and precipitation, as well as drought frequency, duration, and intensity. The results indicate that: (1) precipitation in Meishan exhibits a spatial pattern of high in the west and low in the east, concentrated within May to September annually, with prominent winter-spring dry seasons and large interannual variability. (2) Annual precipitation shows a significant negative correlation with drought frequency, but the response intensity varies considerably among sub-regions, with the strongest correlation in Renshou County and the weakest in Hongya County. (3) Summer drought and winter dryness are the dominant drought types in the city. Drought frequency and duration present a pattern with higher values in the east and lower values in the west. Renshou County and Pengshan District are high-value zones, whereas Hongya County belongs to the low-risk zone. (4) Drought levels are predominantly classified as mild, with the occurrence frequency of severe and higher levels being very low. However, the proportion of medium-to-high intensity droughts in winter dryness is much higher than in other seasons, and eastern counties are more prone to severe and extreme droughts.
文章引用:查婕, 李欣蔚, 肖丹, 赵霞, 陈宁, 胡进. 眉山市干旱特征分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2026, 15(6): 1156-1168. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2026.156122

参考文献

[1] Carrão, H., Naumann, G. and Barbosa, P. (2017) Global Projections of Drought Hazard in a Warming Climate: A Prime for Disaster Risk Management. Climate Dynamics, 50, 2137-2155.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3740-8
[2] 周波涛, 钱进. IPCC AR6报告解读: 极端天气气候事件变化[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 713-718.
[3] 祁海霞, 智协飞, 白永清. 中国干旱发生频率的年代际变化特征及趋势分析[J]. 大气科学学报, 2011, 34(04): 447-455.
[4] 李韵婕, 任福民, 李忆平, 等. 1960-2010年中国西南地区区域性气象干旱事件的特征分析[J]. 气象学报, 2014(2): 266-276.
[5] 周长艳, 张顺谦, 齐冬梅, 等. 近50年四川高温变化特征及其影响[J]. 高原气象, 2013, 32(06): 1720-1728.
[6] 巫娜, 罗凝谊, 许勇. 四川盆地干旱灾害统计特征[J]. 气象科技, 2014, 42(2): 309-313.
[7] 2022年四川生态环境状况公报[EB/OL]. 2023-06-05.
https://sthjt.sc.gov.cn/sthjt/c104157/2023/6/5/644b1b19bbe249cb8b302ae8de2f1538.shtml?eqid=fcf56fc10001ff87000000066480452c, 2026-05-06.
[8] 张顺谦, 侯美亭, 王素艳. 基于信息扩散和模糊评价方法的四川盆地气候干旱综合评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(4): 713-723.
[9] 白莹莹, 等. 四川盆地夏季降水区域差异及其与季风的联系初探[J]. 气象, 2014(4): 440-449.
[10] 高洁, 肖红茹, 郭善云. 2022年夏季四川持续高温干旱特征及成因分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2023, 17(5): 118-126.
[11] 付超, 谌芸, 单九生. 地形因子对降水的影响研究综述[J]. 气象与减灾研究, 2017, 40(4): 318-324.