高校学生心理危机预干预模式的构建——基于认知行为模型的视角
Construction of a Pre-Intervention Model for Psychological Crisis among College Students—From the Perspective of the Cognitive Behavioral Model
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.1611522, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张馨月:成都理工大学工程技术学院心理发展与服务中心,四川 乐山
关键词: 高校学生;心理危机;预干预;认知行为模型;干预模式;College Students; Psychological Crisis; Pre-Intervention; Cognitive Behavioral Model; Intervention Model
摘要: 高校学生心理危机预干预是心理危机干预工作链条中的前端环节,直接关系到危机能否被化解于萌芽状态。针对当前高校重点关注学生干预体系连续性不足、对不同类型学生缺乏针对性策略等问题,本文以认知行为模型为理论视角,在界定心理危机预干预内涵、梳理重点关注学生现实困境与认知行为特征的基础上,构建“评估–分类–分层干预–转介–跟踪”闭环式预干预模式。该模式以自动思维、中间信念与核心信念的识别与修正为核心技术路径,针对经济困难、适应困难、学习困难、人际困难与就业困难五类重点关注学生提出差异化干预要点,并从队伍培训、家校医社协同与模型动态修订三方面提出实施保障,旨在为高校提高心理危机干预的效率与实效性提供可操作的实践框架。
Abstract: Psychological crisis pre-intervention for college students is the front-end link in the psychological crisis intervention chain, directly determining whether a crisis can be resolved in its embryonic stage. In light of the insufficient continuity of the current intervention system for college students of concern and the lack of targeted strategies for different types of students, this paper adopts the cognitive behavioral model as the theoretical perspective. On the basis of defining the connotation of psychological crisis pre-intervention and sorting out the practical difficulties and cognitive behavioral characteristics of students of concern, a closed-loop pre-intervention model of “assessment-classification-layered intervention-referral-follow-up” is constructed. The model takes the identification and modification of automatic thoughts, intermediate beliefs, and core beliefs as its core technical path. It proposes differentiated intervention points for five types of students of concern, namely those with financial difficulties, adjustment difficulties, learning difficulties, interpersonal difficulties, and employment difficulties. It also puts forward implementation guarantees from three aspects: team training, home-school-hospital-community collaboration, and dynamic model revision, aiming to provide an operable practical framework for colleges and universities to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of psychological crisis intervention.
文章引用:张馨月 (2026). 高校学生心理危机预干预模式的构建——基于认知行为模型的视角. 心理学进展, 16(11), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.1611522

参考文献

[1] 贝克(2013). 认知疗法: 基础与应用(第2版, 张怡, 等 译). 中国轻工业出版社.
[2] 毕会东, 朱亚(2023). “三全育人”视角下大学生心理危机识别、动态监测及干预体系构建. 吉林广播电视大学学报, (5), 99-101.
[3] 范雨欣, 赵信如, 李佳璟, 等(2025). “三联动 + 三阶段 + 四要素”大学生心理危机干预模型的构建与应用. 中国林业教育, 43(3), 6-11.
[4] 蒋曼玲, 谭小莉, 曾川(2019). 我国高校学生心理危机干预模式研究综述. 延边教育学院学报, 33(3), 28-30.
[5] 教育部等十七部门(2023). 教育部等十七部门关于印发《全面加强和改进新时代学生心理健康工作专项行动计划(2023—2025年)》的通知.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202305/content_6857361.htm
[6] 冷红(2021). 认知行为疗法在学生特色成长辅导室中的育人实践与探索. 校园心理, 19(2), 167-168.
[7] 俞国良, 陈雨濛(2022). 四十年来我国高校心理健康教育政策分析: 定性与定量的视角. 复旦教育论坛, 20(4), 80-87.
[8] 俞国良, 黄潇潇(2023). 学生心理健康问题检出率比较: 元分析的证据. 教育研究, 44(6), 105-121.
[9] 中共教育部党组(2018). 关于印发《高等学校学生心理健康教育指导纲要》的通知.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5443423.htm
[10] Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F. et al. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of Depression. Guilford Press.
[11] Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. International Universities Press.
[12] Conley, C. S., Durlak, J. A., & Kirsch, A. C. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of Universal Mental Health Prevention Programs for Higher Education Students. Prevention Science, 16, 487-507.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0543-1
[13] Conley, C. S., Shapiro, J. B., Kirsch, A. C., & Durlak, J. A. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Indicated Mental Health Prevention Programs for At-Risk Higher Education Students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64, 121-140.
https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000190
[14] Cui, L., He, F., Han, Z., Yang, R., Xiao, J., & Oei, T. P. S. (2016). A Brief Group Cognitive-Behavioral Program for the Prevention of Depressive Symptoms in Chinese College Students. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 66, 291-307.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2015.1111098
[15] Stallman, H. M., Ohan, J. L., & Chiera, B. (2019). Reducing Distress in University Students: A Randomised Control Trial of Two Online Interventions. Australian Psychologist, 54, 125-131.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12375
[16] Wells, H., & Jones, A. (2018). Learning to Change: The Rationale for the Use of Motivational Interviewing in Higher Education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55, 111-118.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1198714
[17] Worsley, J. D., Pennington, A., & Corcoran, R. (2022). Supporting Mental Health and Wellbeing of University and College Students: A Systematic Review of Review-Level Evidence of Interventions. PLOS ONE, 17, e0266725.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266725