城市初老群体养老焦虑的社会生成逻辑
The Social Generative Logic of Elderly Care Anxiety among the Early Aging Population in Cities
摘要: 在人口老龄化持续加深的背景下,城市初老群体面临退休转折与养老规划的双重压力,其养老焦虑日益成为值得关注的社会议题。本研究将养老焦虑界定为社会建构的情感状态,整合生命历程、风险社会与代际互惠理论,建立“结构–文化–关系”分析框架,通过深度访谈与参与观察揭示其生成逻辑。研究发现,养老焦虑深嵌于退休角色中断、养老责任个体化、代际互惠期待错位及社会比较等社会过程之中,并非个体心理脆弱的产物,转型期结构因素衍生的不确定性难以根除。研究拓展了养老情感社会学的讨论空间,并为初老群体的社会支持与信息服务提供了经验依据。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of continuously deepening population aging, the urban pre-elderly group faces the dual pressures of retirement transition and elderly care planning, and their anxiety about elderly care has increasingly become a social issue worthy of attention. This study defines elderly care anxiety as a socially constructed emotional state, integrates theories of life course, risk society, and intergenerational reciprocity, establishes an “structure-culture-relationship” analytical framework, and reveals its generation logic through in-depth interviews and participatory observation. The research finds that elderly care anxiety is deeply embedded in social processes such as the interruption of retirement roles, the individualization of elderly care responsibilities, the misalignment of expectations for intergenerational reciprocity, and social comparison. It is not a product of individual psychological vulnerability, and the uncertainty derived from structural factors in the transition period is difficult to eradicate. The study expands the discussion space of the sociology of elderly care emotions and provides empirical evidence for social support and information services for the pre-elderly group.
文章引用:丁倩倩. 城市初老群体养老焦虑的社会生成逻辑[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(11): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.1311818

参考文献

[1] 陈嘉慧. 城市第一代独生子女父母的养老焦虑问题研究: 以GL市为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2024.
[2] 王莉, 王国军. 代际关系变迁与农村中老年群体社会养老保险参与[J]. 兰州学刊, 2023(3): 126-142.
[3] 徐律. 社会焦虑何以可能: 一项基于个体性视角下的反身性探索[J]. 浙江学刊, 2021(4): 172-182.
[4] 徐强, 张开云, 周杨. 传统保障、养老保险与农村居民的养老担忧度[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2023(8): 80-89+158-159.
[5] 孙书彦, 纪竞垚, 黄石松. 中国老年人的代际支持模式及其对养老方式选择的影响[J]. 西北人口, 2022, 43(5): 13-23.
[6] Elder Jr., G.H. (1994) Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 4-15.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2786971
[7] Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[8] 张融. 从集体到个人: 新中国家庭生活的变革——《私人生活的变革——一个中国村庄里的爱情、家庭与亲密关系(1949-1999)》读书札记[J]. 牡丹江大学学报, 2020, 29(4): 18-21.
[9] 周飞舟, 宋丹丹. 城乡融合进程中的家庭与教育[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2024(11): 99-101.
[10] 陈皆明. 投资与赡养——关于城市居民代际交换的因果分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 1998(6): 131-149.
[11] 徐依婷, 沈毅. 城市“新老人”的群体特征与代际责任研究[J]. 中州学刊, 2022(4): 65-71.
[12] 费孝通. 家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题——再论中国家庭结构的变动[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1983(3): 7-16.
[13] 于洁阳. 父代责任伦理调适与家庭养老法制优化[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 23(2): 116-128.
[14] 郭琦, 肖瑛, 王东晖, 等. “吾心安处是我家”: 农村养老机构中老人的本体安全和生存焦虑[J]. 开放时代, 2024(2): 172-189+10.