基于元认知策略的在线学习支架设计
Designing Online Learning Scaffolds Based on Metacognitive Strategies
摘要: 生成式人工智能(GAI)深度融入在线教育,在提升学习效率的同时,也带来认知外包、学习主体性消解与深度思维弱化等风险,构建以学习者为中心的认知防护机制已成为当务之急。本研究通过系统性文献综述,整合2020~2025年间52篇中外文献,围绕元认知策略如何抵御GAI认知异化这一问题,构建了涵盖目标规划、过程监控、策略调节与反思评估的在线学习支架。该支架以高等教育中的批判性思维训练为应用场景,设计遵循学习主体性优先、过程导向、动态适应与透明性四项原则,并通过课程嵌入、教学活动设计与过程性评价实现落地。以元认知为核心,该支架能够引导学习者在与GAI互动中保持认知自主性,为智能时代在线教育兼顾技术赋能与育人本质提供可操作的理论路径与实践参照。
Abstract: The deep integration of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) into online education improves learning efficiency while also creating risks such as cognitive offloading, the erosion of learner agency, and the weakening of deep thinking. Building a learner-centered cognitive protection mechanism has therefore become an urgent task. Through a systematic literature review of 52 Chinese and international studies published between 2020 and 2025, this study addresses how metacognitive strategies can counter GAI-induced cognitive alienation and constructs online learning scaffolds that encompass goal planning, process monitoring, strategy regulation, and reflective evaluation. This framework is applied in the context of critical thinking training within higher education. The scaffold design follows four principles: prioritizing learner agency, process orientation, dynamic adaptation, and transparency. It is implemented through curriculum embedding, instructional activity design, and process-based assessment. With metacognition at its core, the scaffolds can guide learners to maintain their cognitive autonomy when interacting with GAI, thereby providing an actionable theoretical pathway and practical reference for online education in the intelligent era to balance technological empowerment with the essence of education.
文章引用:吴安峤. 基于元认知策略的在线学习支架设计[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(11): 263-269. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.16112382

参考文献

[1] 刘伟, 韩淇. 技术异化视域下数字化学习的偏离与匡正[J]. 现代教育技术, 2026, 36(3): 14-22.
[2] 王文韬, 任艳虹, 钱鹏博, 等. 从卸载到外包: GenAI时代认知策略的异化风险与应对框架[J/OL]. 图书情报工作: 1-14.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1541.G2.20260824.1002.008, 2026-09-30.
[3] 鲁长风, 李荣华, 田友谊. 跨越“利维坦”: 研究生科研中生成式人工智能应用的风险与规避[J]. 电化教育研究, 2025, 46(11): 70-76.
[4] 吴丹, 郭清玥. 用户与生成式人工智能交互中的信息甄别能力研究: 影响机制与培育策略[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2025, 15(4): 80-86.
[5] 孙发勤, 李娜娜, 沈霞娟, 等. 认知增强抑或认知债务: 生成式人工智能影响认知的双重机制[J]. 电化教育研究, 2026, 47(9): 26-33.
[6] Zhuang, M., Long, S., Martin, F. and Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2025) The Affordances of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Ethical Considerations across the Instruction Cycle: A Systematic Review of AI in Online Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 67, Article ID: 101039.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101039
[7] 陈本皓. 人机协同下的AI风险链: 认知外包、能力空心化、深度思维僵化[J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 47(5): 194-204.
[8] 马忠, 高怡英. 生成式大语言模型的社会认知风险与应对[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2025(2): 95-105, 158.
[9] Xu, X., Qiao, L., Cheng, N., Liu, H. and Zhao, W. (2025) Enhancing Self-Regulated Learning and Learning Experience in Generative AI Environments: The Critical Role of Metacognitive Support. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 1842-1863.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13599
[10] 赵晓伟, 王师晓, 李情, 等. 苏格拉底式问题支架: 促进学生向AI大模型提出高质量问题[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2025, 37(1): 102-112.
[11] 张琪, 罗霞, 陈玉杰, 等. 促进批判性思维发展的人智协同学习模式构建研究[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2026, 44(1): 61-72.