宅基地功能重构与农村养老保障的耦合机制研究
Coupling Mechanism between Homestead Functional Reconstruction and Rural Eldercare Security
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.1311820, PDF,   
作者: 冯小薇:南京林业大学人文社会科学学院、生态文明传播学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 宅基地转型;农村养老保障;资源治理;Homestead Transformation; Rural Eldercare Security; Resource Governance
摘要: 在中国式现代化与乡村振兴战略叠加推进的背景下,农村宅基地正经历由传统生存保障型资源向复合型发展资源的系统性功能转型。与此同时,农村人口老龄化持续加深,传统家庭养老功能弱化与正式制度供给不足形成结构性张力,使宅基地在老年群体养老保障中的基础性作用日益凸显。本文基于空间正义理论与协同治理理论,构建“资源转型–保障重构–协同治理”分析框架,系统考察宅基地功能转型的现实表征及其与农村老年人养老保障体系的互动逻辑。研究发现:宅基地功能转型呈现闲置化、资产化与治理化三重特征,其资源效率导向的制度变迁在提升配置效率的同时,也引发居住保障弱化、收益分配失衡、家庭支持断裂及制度协同不足等结构性困境,对老年群体养老安全形成多维风险。破解困境的关键在于强化居住保障底线、优化收益分配机制、重构家庭与社区支持体系、推进资源治理与养老保障制度协同,以实现效率逻辑与保障逻辑的动态平衡。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of Chinese-style modernization and the rural revitalization strategy advancing in tandem, rural homesteads are undergoing a systematic functional transformation from traditional subsistence-security resources to composite development-oriented resources. Concurrently, the deepening aging of the rural population, coupled with the weakening of traditional family eldercare functions and insufficient formal institutional supply, has created a structural tension that increasingly highlights the foundational role of homesteads in the eldercare security of older adults. Drawing upon spatial justice theory and collaborative governance theory, this paper constructs an analytical framework of “resource transformation-security reconstruction-collaborative governance” to systematically examine the realistic manifestations of homestead functional transformation and its interactive logic with the eldercare security system for rural older adults. The study finds that the functional transformation of homesteads exhibits threefold characteristics: idleness, capitalization, and governance-orientation. While the resource efficiency-oriented institutional changes enhance allocative efficiency, they also give rise to structural predicaments including the weakening of residential security, imbalance in benefit distribution, fragmentation of family support, and insufficient institutional coordination, thereby generating multidimensional risks to the eldercare security of older adults. The key to resolving these predicaments lies in reinforcing the bottom line of residential security, optimizing benefit distribution mechanisms, reconstructing family and community support systems, and promoting the synergy between resource governance and eldercare security institutions, so as to achieve a dynamic equilibrium between efficiency logic and security logic.
文章引用:冯小薇. 宅基地功能重构与农村养老保障的耦合机制研究[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(11): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.1311820

参考文献

[1] 奚圣, 仇毅姗. 利用农村闲置宅基地开展养老服务的实践探索——以上海市奉贤区柘林镇“椿萱庭”模式为例[J]. 中国民政, 2026(2): 53-54.
[2] 李豪杰, 涂金钗, 陆青青, 等. 宅基地退出补偿模式下农村家庭养老问题思考[J]. 农业展望, 2023, 19(2): 60-66.
[3] Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Farrar & Rinehart.
[4] Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Alfred A. Knopf.
[5] Rowles, G.D. (1983) Place and Personal Identity in Old Age: Observations from Appalachia. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 299-313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(83)80033-4
[6] 罗舒雯, 叶剑平. “三权分置”背景下宅基地流转困境及协同治理模式构建——基于浙江省L市的实证调查[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 22(4): 69-75.
[7] 李婷婷, 龙花楼, 王艳飞. 中国农村宅基地闲置程度及其成因分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(12): 64-71.
[8] 孙婧雯, 刘彦随, 戈大专, 等. 平原农区土地综合整治与乡村转型发展协同机制[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(8): 1971-1986.
[9] 张佰林, 张凤荣, 曲衍波, 等. 宅基地退出与再利用研究热点与展望[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(7): 1277-1292.
[10] 穆光宗, 王玉坤. 中国机构养老的历史演进与当代启示[J]. 晋阳学刊, 2023(4): 34-41.
[11] 陆杰华, 谷俞辰. 中国式养老的现实定位、关键议题与转型进路[J]. 人口与经济, 2024(5): 1-12.
[12] 吴玉韶. 当前要着力做好六项老龄工作[N]. 中国老年报, 2020-12-23(004).
[13] 贺雪峰. 互助养老: 中国农村养老的出路[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(5): 1-8.
[14] 陈锡文, 刘守英, 魏后凯, 等. “共同富裕、社会保障与乡村振兴”笔谈[J]. 社会保障评论, 2022, 6(6): 3-20.
[15] 韩俊. 依法保障农民宅基地和房屋财产权益[J]. 农村工作通讯, 2014(20): 48.
[16] 郑扶阳. 宅基地流转对农村养老服务水平的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2024.
[17] 涂金钗, 李豪杰, 姚志. 宅基地退出: 利益补偿分配与农村家庭养老[J]. 中国集体经济, 2023(33): 5-8.
[18] 何雄伟, 杨志诚. 经济补偿模式、农户家庭特征与土地承包权退出[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(8): 70-81.
[19] 张勇, 高羽洁. 农村闲置宅基地分类诊断及其治理路径——基于安徽省试点地区两个村的考察[J]. 中国土地科学, 2025, 39(2): 106-116.
[20] 李慧思. 管好用好农村集体资源资产——以冀州区为例盘活农村资源的调研[J]. 基层农技推广, 2025, 13(10): 60-62.