碳交易与碳税混合政策下供应链动态减排决策与工程管理研究
Research on Dynamic Emission Reduction Decision-Making and Engineering Management of Supply Chain under the Mixed Policy of Carbon Trading and Carbon Tax
摘要: 文章聚焦于“双碳”目标下,探讨了碳交易、碳税及两种政策相结合的混合政策如何影响供应链的动态减排决策。研究构建了一个由单个供应商(跟随者)和单个制造商(领导者)组成的二级供应链Stackelberg微分博弈模型。文章分别在碳交易、碳税和混合政策三种情景下,求解了供应链成员的最优减排努力、最终产品的稳态减排水平以及各自的利润。通过对比分析和数值仿真,研究得出结论:混合碳政策对供应链成员的减排激励最强,其减排水平和产品碳减排水平均显著高于单一政策;政府采用“碳税 + 碳交易”的混合政策能够有效推动高排放行业的全链条低碳转型。研究为“双碳”目标下碳政策组合设计、低碳供应链工程管理与碳减排工程实施提供了理论依据。
Abstract: This paper focuses on the “dual carbon” goals and examines how carbon trading, a carbon tax, and a hybrid policy combining the two influence dynamic emissions reduction decisions in supply chains. The study constructs a two-level Stackelberg differential game model consisting of a single supplier (follower) and a single manufacturer (leader). The paper solves for the optimal emission reduction efforts of supply chain participants, the steady-state emission reduction level of the final product, and their respective profits under three scenarios: carbon trading, a carbon tax, and a hybrid policy. Through comparative analysis and numerical simulations, the study concludes that hybrid carbon policies provide the strongest incentives for emissions reduction among supply chain participants, with both their emissions reduction levels and the carbon reduction levels of the final product being significantly higher than under either single policy; the government’s adoption of a “carbon tax + carbon trading” hybrid policy can effectively drive the full-chain low-carbon transition in high-emission industries. This research provides a theoretical basis for the design of carbon policy portfolios, the engineering management of low-carbon supply chains, and the implementation of carbon reduction projects under the “Dual Carbon” goals.
文章引用:吴丹, 徐琪. 碳交易与碳税混合政策下供应链动态减排决策与工程管理研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2026, 15(6): 1146-1162. https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2026.156111

参考文献

[1] 邹清明, 胡李庆, 邹霆钧. 碳限额与碳交易机制下考虑公平关切的供应链定价与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 142-154.
[2] 夏良杰, 曹云丽, 尹文昊, 等. 碳交易规制下过度自信制造商与减排服务商的减排博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(10): 85-95.
[3] 王文宾, 管婕, 戚金钰, 等. 碳限额交易机制下大数据服务商参与的供应链决策模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2025, 34(1): 68-80.
[4] Cong, J., Pang, T. and Peng, H. (2020) Optimal Strategies for Capital Constrained Low-Carbon Supply Chains under Yield Uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, Article ID: 120339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120339
[5] 丁志刚, 陈涵, 徐琪. 碳交易与碳税双重风险下供应链低碳技术采纳时机决策研究[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(7): 101-107.
[6] Hosseini-Motlagh, S., Ebrahimi, S. and Jokar, A. (2019) Sustainable Supply Chain Coordination under Competition and Green Effort Scheme. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72, 304-319.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1671152
[7] 夏良杰, 孔清逸, 李友东, 等. 考虑交叉持股的低碳供应链减排与定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 70-81.
[8] Xu, C., Wang, C. and Huang, R. (2020) Impacts of Horizontal Integration on Social Welfare under the Interaction of Carbon Tax and Green Subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, Article ID: 107506.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.027
[9] Dou, G., Ma, L., Wei, K. and Zhang, Q. (2023) A Joint Analysis of the Environmental and Economic Performances of Closed-Loop Supply Chains under Carbon Tax Regulation. In: Dou, G., Ma, L., Wei, K. and Zhang, Q., Eds., Operations Management for Environmental Sustainability, Springer, 53-84.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37600-9_4
[10] 杨玉香, 管倩, 张宝友, 等. 碳税政策下闭环供应链网络均衡分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 185-195.
[11] 缪朝炜, 上官莉莉, 许舒婷, 等. 碳税政策下考虑双寡头竞争的再制造决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2024, 38(6): 187-200.
[12] 曹柬, 卞兆龙, 陆佳雯, 等. 基于碳税的EPR规制设计——制造-再制造竞争视角[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2025, 45(6): 1960-1979.
[13] 代业明, 于双. 碳税政策下考虑零售商双重行为偏好的再制造闭环供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 308-320.
[14] 矫梦迪, 黄帅. 碳关税冲击下跨边境供应链减排策略和协调机制[J]. 青岛大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 39(3): 52-58.
[15] 宋鹏, 黄婉婷, 毛显强, 等. 协同碳减排与非化石能源发展目标的政策效应: 征税与补贴[J]. 管理科学学报, 2025, 28(5): 174-190.
[16] 刁心薇, 曾珍香, 孙丞. 混合碳政策下两产品供应链的协同研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 149-159.
[17] Sun, H. and Yang, J. (2021) Optimal Decisions for Competitive Manufacturers under Carbon Tax and Cap-and-Trade Policies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 156, Article ID: 107244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107244
[18] 杨玉香, 李剑锋, 金芳芳, 等. 供应链网络均衡下碳税与碳交易政策比较[J]. 系统工程学报, 2022, 37(2): 178-193.
[19] 何莎, 严星星, 宋李文, 等. 碳税与碳交易政策比较[J]. 青海金融, 2023(2): 4-14.
[20] 朱晨, 马静, 李犟. 混合碳政策下的供应链联合减排决策与优化[J]. 系统管理学报, 2024, 33(5): 1204-1217.
[21] 江民星, 贺一江, 朱帮助. 不确定信息下跨期动态的混合减排政策研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(7): 2213-2226.
[22] 陈庭强, 侯月娟, 王磊, 等. 碳税碳交易协同下企业间碳交易对手风险传染[J]. 系统管理学报, 2025, 34(4): 1089-1111.
[23] 张玲红, 刘方媛, 朱立龙, 等. 考虑零售商公平关切与广告努力水平的碳减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 138-148.
[24] 李飚, 夏西强, 李秋月. 碳配额下碳交易对碳减排效应的影响及协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 250-261.
[25] 邵舒羽, 王晴, 刘艳. 政府动态奖惩机制下中小型制造企业绿色转型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(8): 269-279.
[26] He, L., Yuan, B., Bian, J. and Lai, K.K. (2021) Differential Game Theoretic Analysis of the Dynamic Emission Abatement in Low-Carbon Supply Chains. Annals of Operations Research, 324, 355-393.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04134-9
[27] Zhou, Y. and Ye, X. (2018) Differential Game Model of Joint Emission Reduction Strategies and Contract Design in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 592-607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.133
[28] Yang, Y. and Xu, X. (2019) A Differential Game Model for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Participants under Carbon Emission Permits. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 1077-1090.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.049
[29] Jiang, K., You, D., Li, Z. and Shi, S. (2019) A Differential Game Approach to Dynamic Optimal Control Strategies for Watershed Pollution across Regional Boundaries under Eco-Compensation Criterion. Ecological Indicators, 105, 229-241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.065
[30] 武丹, 杨玉香. 考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链减排微分博弈模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 126-137.
[31] 王一雷, 夏西强, 张言. 碳交易政策下供应链碳减排与低碳宣传的微分对策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 155-166.
[32] 姜跃, 韩水华, 赵洋. 基于零售商公平偏好的联合碳减排与低碳宣传微分对策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(7): 173-182.
[33] 张丹露, 李峰, 梁樑, 等. 碳交易背景下考虑消费者动态绿色感知的碳减排决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 269-281.
[34] Shen, J., Zhang, Q., Tian, S., Li, X., Liu, J. and Tian, J. (2024) The Role of Hydrogen in Iron and Steel Production: Development Trends, Decarbonization Potentials, and Economic Impacts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 92, 1409-1422.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.368
[35] 范学峰, 何学坤, 赵运建, 等. 钢铁行业碳捕集、利用与封存技术应用研究进展[J]. 低碳化学与化工, 2025, 50(1): 132-142.
[36] 徐春秋, 赵道致, 原白云, 等. 上下游联合减排与低碳宣传的微分博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(2): 53-65.
[37] Xia, L., Guo, T., Qin, J., Yue, X. and Zhu, N. (2017) Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Policies of a Supply Chain Considering Reciprocal Preferences in Cap-and-Trade System. Annals of Operations Research, 268, 149-175.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2657-2
[38] Xia, L., Bai, Y., Ghose, S. and Qin, J. (2020) Differential Game Analysis of Carbon Emissions Reduction and Promotion in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Social Preferences. Annals of Operations Research, 310, 257-292.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03838-8