针灸治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的文献计量学与可视化分析

Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

摘要: 目的：采用文献计量学分析针灸治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的研究特征及热点演进。方法：检索中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science核心合集(Web of Science Core Collection, WoSCC)建库至2026年6月23日的文献，运用VOSviewer、CiteSpace等软件，对发文趋势、合作网络、关键词及共被引文献进行可视化分析，并以模块度Q值和平均轮廓系数S值评价聚类效果。结果：纳入603篇文献，其中CNKI 537篇、WoSCC 66篇。CNKI年发文量呈波动增长，WoSCC文献自2015年后逐渐活跃。CNKI发文量最多的机构为天津中医药大学第一附属医院和广州中医药大学(均14篇)，发文量最多的作者为刘步平；WoSCC发文量最多的机构和作者分别为北京中医药大学、Liu Zhishun；作者与机构合作以核心团队内部为主，跨团队、跨机构联系不足。关键词、聚类及突现分析显示，研究热点由针刺、电针及具体穴位拓展至随机对照试验、证据整合与机制研究。结论：该领域的研究关注正由经验性探索逐步转向规范化循证验证，在验证临床疗效的同时，更加重视干预方案规范与机制阐释，未来研究需规范针灸方案与核心结局指标，优化穴位配伍及针刺量效关系，开展多中心、大样本研究，提高研究质量和临床适用性。

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the research characteristics and evolution of hotspots in acupuncture treatment for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) using bibliometric methods. Methods: Literature indexed in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) from database inception to June 23, 2026 was retrieved. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to visualize publication trends, collaboration networks, keywords, and co-cited references. Modularity Q and mean silhouette S were used to evaluate clustering quality. Results: A total of 603 publications were included, comprising 537 CNKI publications and 66 WoSCC publications. CNKI publications showed an overall fluctuating increase, whereas WoSCC publications became more active after 2015. In CNKI, the leading institutions were the First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (14 publications each), and the leading author was Liu Buping; in WoSCC, the leading institution and author were Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and Liu Zhishun, respectively. Collaboration was concentrated within core teams, with limited links across teams and institutions. Keyword, clustering, and burst analyses showed that research hotspots expanded from acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and specific acupoints to randomized controlled trials, evidence synthesis, and mechanism research. Conclusion: Research on acupuncture for CP/CPPS is shifting from experience-based exploration toward standardized evidence-based evaluation, with increasing emphasis on intervention standardization and mechanistic elucidation alongside clinical efficacy. Future studies should standardize acupuncture protocols and core outcome measures, optimize acupoint combinations and dose-response relationships, conduct multicenter, large-sample studies, and improve research quality and clinical applicability.