异质缺失数据的重要性加权变分插补
Importance-Weighted Variational Imputation for Heterogeneous Missing Data
DOI: 10.12677/pm.2026.1611232, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 史俊歌:华北水利水电大学数学与统计学院,河南 郑州;河南省科学院数学研究所,河南 郑州;廖剑晖*:河南省科学院数学研究所,河南 郑州
关键词: 异质数据;缺失数据;变分推断;重要性加权;数据插补;Heterogeneous Data; Missing Data; Variational Inference; Importance Weighting; Data Imputation
摘要: 针对异质表格数据中的缺失值插补问题,本文构建重要性加权变分插补框架H-MIWAE (Heterogeneous Missing-data Importance-Weighted Autoencoder)。该框架在混合离散–连续潜变量结构下引入类型特异观测分布,并结合多样本重要性加权目标与自归一化重要性采样,实现对异质属性的统一建模与条件预测。为区分训练阶段与插补阶段的重要性采样作用,本文分别以 K tr 和 L imp 表示两个阶段使用的重要性样本数,并研究二者对不同属性类型插补性能的联合影响。在合成数据集和真实异质数据集上的实验表明,H-MIWAE能够对多类异质属性进行统一插补,并在不同数据条件下表现出较强的竞争力。结果表明,多样本训练所带来的插补收益依赖于后续的重要性采样,且这种依赖在不同属性类型上表现并不一致。
Abstract: This paper develops the Heterogeneous Missing-data Importance-Weighted Autoencoder (H-MIWAE), an importance-weighted variational imputation framework for missing-value imputation in heterogeneous tabular data. Under a mixed discrete-continuous latent-variable structure, the framework incorporates type-specific observation distributions and combines a multi-sample importance-weighted objective with self-normalized importance sampling to achieve unified modeling and conditional prediction for heterogeneous attributes. To distinguish the roles of importance sampling in the training and imputation stages, K tr and L imp denote the numbers of importance samples used in the two stages, respectively, and their joint effects on imputation performance across different attribute types are investigated. Experiments on synthetic and real-world heterogeneous data sets show that H-MIWAE can perform unified imputation for multiple types of heterogeneous attributes and achieves competitive performance under different data settings. The results further show that the imputation gains brought by multi-sample training depend on the subsequent importance sampling, and that this dependence varies across attribute types.
文章引用:史俊歌, 廖剑晖. 异质缺失数据的重要性加权变分插补[J]. 理论数学, 2026, 16(11): 34-47. https://doi.org/10.12677/pm.2026.1611232

参考文献

[1] Josse, J. and Reiter, J.P. (2018) Introduction to the Special Section on Missing Data. Statistical Science, 33, 139-141.
https://doi.org/10.1214/18-sts332in
[2] Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (2002) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd Edition, Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119013563
[3] Valera, I. and Ghahramani, Z. (2017) Automatic Discovery of the Statistical Types of Variables in a Dataset. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 70, 3521-3529.
[4] Buuren, S.V. and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011) Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1-67.
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
[5] Troyanskaya, O., Cantor, M., Sherlock, G., Brown, P., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., et al. (2001) Missing Value Estimation Methods for DNA Microarrays. Bioinformatics, 17, 520-525.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520
[6] Stekhoven, D.J. and Bühlmann, P. (2012) MissForest-Non-Parametric Missing Value Imputation for Mixed-Type Data. Bioinformatics, 28, 112-118.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597
[7] Murray, J.S. (2018) Multiple Imputation: A Review of Practical and Theoretical Findings. Statistical Science, 33, 142-159.
https://doi.org/10.1214/18-sts644
[8] Kingma, D.P. and Welling, M. (2014) Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. arXiv: 1312.6114.
[9] Rezende, D.J., Mohamed, S. and Wierstra, D. (2014) Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative Models. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, Beijing, 21-26 June 2014, 1278-1286.
[10] Yoon, J., Jordon, J. and van der Schaar, M. (2018) GAIN: Missing Data Imputation Using Generative Adversarial Nets. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, 10-15 July 2018, 5689-5698.
[11] Ivanov, O., Figurnov, M. and Vetrov, D. (2019) Variational Autoencoder with Arbitrary Conditioning. arXiv: 1806.02382.
[12] Nazábal, A., Olmos, P.M., Ghahramani, Z. and Valera, I. (2020) Handling Incomplete Heterogeneous Data Using Vaes. Pattern Recognition, 107, Article ID: 107501.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107501
[13] Mattei, P.A. and Frellsen, J. (2019) MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling and Imputation of Incomplete Data Sets. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vancouver,13-19 July 2025, 4413-4423.
[14] Rainforth, T., Kosiorek, A., Le, T.A., Maddison, C., Igl, M., Wood, F. and Teh, Y.W. (2018) Tighter Variational Bounds Are Not Necessarily Better. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, 10-15 July 2018, 4277-4285.
[15] Burda, Y., Grosse, R. and Salakhutdinov, R. (2016) Importance Weighted Autoencoders. arXiv: 1509.00519.
[16] Mnih, A. and Rezende, D.J. (2016) Variational Inference for Monte Carlo Objectives. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Vancouver, 13-19 July 2025, 2188-2196.