建筑材料课程人机协同教学的认知卸载调控
Regulating Cognitive Offloading in Human-AI Collaborative Teaching of Building Materials Courses
摘要: 文章针对建筑材料课程人机协同教学中认知卸载既能释放认知资源,又可能削弱学生独立判断与迁移能力的双重效应,采用文献分析、逆向教学设计和“目标–任务–证据”一致性审查,以滨海低碳混凝土配合比设计为例,明确人工智能的使用权限与学生应承担的认知责任。在此基础上,提出“独立预判–有界推演–专业核验–支架撤除–无AI迁移”五阶段调控链,设置基线、过程和终点三类检验,并从独立迁移、依赖落差、核验质量、信心校准和延迟保持等方面构建评价指标。该方案并非排斥人工智能,而是选择性卸载信息检索、重复计算等次要活动,同时保留问题界定、机理解释、标准判定和工程决策等核心认知责任,以协调工具效能与学生能力发展,但其实际效果仍需通过真实课堂数据进一步验证。
Abstract: Cognitive offloading in human-AI collaborative teaching in a building materials course can conserve cognitive resources but may also weaken students’ independent judgment and transfer ability. Drawing on literature analysis, backward instructional design, and an “objective - task - evidence” alignment review, this study uses a coastal low-carbon concrete mix-design project to define AI permissions and students’ cognitive responsibilities. It proposes a five-stage regulatory sequence comprising “independent prediction - bounded reasoning - professional verification - scaffold removal - AI-free transfer”, together with baseline, process, and endpoint checks. Assessment indicators cover independent transfer, dependence gaps, verification quality, confidence calibration, and delayed retention. Rather than excluding AI, the framework selectively offloads secondary activities such as information retrieval and repetitive calculation while retaining students’ core cognitive responsibility for problem formulation, mechanism explanation, standards-based judgment, and engineering decisions to balance tool effectiveness with the development of students’ abilities. Its effectiveness requires further validation with authentic classroom data.
文章引用:程博远. 建筑材料课程人机协同教学的认知卸载调控[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(11): 549-556. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.16112415

参考文献

[1] 教育部等五部门关于印发《“人工智能+教育”行动计划》的通知[EB/OL].
https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202604/t20260410_1433240.html, 2026-04-10.
[2] Miao, F. and Holmes, W. (2023) Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.
[3] Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö. and Mariman, R. (2025) Generative AI without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122, e2422633122.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122
[4] Risko, E.F. and Gilbert, S.J. (2016) Cognitive Offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 676-688.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
[5] Misiejuk, K., López-Pernas, S., Kaliisa, R. and Saqr, M. (2026) Cognitive Offloading in Student-AI Collaboration: A Longitudinal Analysis of Prompting Strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 22, Article 101130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101130
[6] 董剑桥. 认知卸载还是认知外包: 教育数字化转型中的赋能与去智化风险[J]. 外国语文, 2025, 41(6): 12-27.
[7] 尚俊杰, 刘倩, 夏琪. 学习科学赋能人工智能教育应用的理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 教育智能化前沿, 2026, 39(2): 61-68.
[8] 李海峰, 王炜. 人机协同深度探究性教学模式: 以基于ChatGPT和QQ开发的人机协同探究性学习系统为例[J]. 开放教育研究, 2023, 29(6): 69-81.
[9] 卢滇楠, 等. 生成式人工智能赋能高校课程教学: 以“化工热力学”课程为例[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2024, 45(5): 89-98.
[10] 张鹏, 汪旸, 尚俊杰. 生成式人工智能与教育变革: 价值、困难与策略[J]. 现代教育技术, 2024, 34(6): 14-24.
[11] 姜占, 滕乐, 童昕阳, 等. 人工智能驱动可持续混凝土: 方法、机遇、挑战[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2026, 54(3): 1016-1031.
[12] Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. and Paas, F. (2019) Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
[13] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
[14] Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. and Ross, G. (1976) The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
[15] JGJ 55-2011普通混凝土配合比设计规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.