社会支持与大学生生命意义感的关系：人工智能素养与社会适应的链式中介及成长型思维的调节作用
Social Support and Meaning in Life among College Students: The Chain Mediating Effects of AI Literacy and Social Adaptation and the Moderating Effect of Growth Mindset
摘要: 为考察人工智能素养与社会适应在社会支持与大学生生命意义感之间的链式中介作用，以及成长型思维对链式前半路径的调节作用，采用领悟社会支持量表、人工智能素养量表、大学适应题本、成长型思维量表与生命意义感问卷对306名在读大学生施测，经质量控制规则清洗后获得有效问卷244份(79.7%)。结果发现：1) 社会支持显著正向预测拥有意义感(总效应c = 0.34)；社会支持经社会适应的间接效应显著(IE = 0.27)，经“人工智能素养 → 社会适应”的链式间接效应亦显著(IE = 0.06)，而人工智能素养单独的中介效应不显著(IE = 0.01)；2) 成长型思维显著调节社会支持与人工智能素养的关联(交互项β = 0.15)，链式路径的调节中介指数显著(IMM = 0.030, 95% CI [0.007, 0.066])；随成长型思维水平升高，社会支持对人工智能素养的效应由0.21增至0.36、0.52。结果提示：社会适应是社会支持与生命意义感关联中最稳健的中介通道，人工智能素养与生命意义感的联系须经社会适应的中介得以体现，“技能–适应–意义”呈现出层层递进的关联结构；成长型思维是关乎社会支持与人工智能素养关联强弱的信念性边界条件。
Abstract: This study examined the chain mediating roles of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and social adaptation in the relationship between social support and meaning in life among college students, and the moderating effect of growth mindset on the first half of the chain. A total of 306 college students completed the Perceived Social Support Scale, the AI Literacy Scale, the College Adaptation Inventory, the Growth Mindset Scale, and the Meaning in Life Questionnaire; after quality-control screening, 244 valid questionnaires (79.7%) were retained. The results showed that: 1) social support positively predicted the presence of meaning in life (total effect c = 0.34); the indirect effect of social support on meaning in life via social adaptation was significant (IE = 0.27), as was the chain indirect effect via “AI literacy → social adaptation” (IE = 0.06), whereas the single mediating effect of AI literacy was not significant (IE = 0.01); 2) growth mindset significantly moderated the effect of social support on AI literacy (interaction β = 0.15), and the index of moderated mediation for the chain path was significant (IMM = 0.030, 95% CI [0.007, 0.066]); as growth mindset increased, the effect of social support on AI literacy increased from 0.21 to 0.36 and 0.52. These results suggest that social adaptation is the most robust mediator linking social support to meaning in life; AI literacy is associated with meaning in life only via its association with social adaptation, forming a progressive “skill-adaptation-meaning” transformation chain. Growth mindset serves as a belief-based boundary condition associated with the strength of the link between social support and AI literacy.
文章引用：王萍 (2026). 社会支持与大学生生命意义感的关系：人工智能素养与社会适应的链式中介及成长型思维的调节作用. 心理学进展, 16(11), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.1611532

参考文献

[1] 教育部《大学生心理健康测评系统》课题组, 方晓义, 沃建中, 等(2005). 《中国大学生适应量表》的编制. 心理与行为研究, 3(2), 95-101.
[2] 李占宏, 赵梦娇, 肖紫瑶, 等(2018). 利他行为与生命意义感: 领悟到的社会支持与自尊的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (5), 92-96.
[3] 武奥威, 李灵(2022). 社会支持对生命意义感的影响: 心理资本和核心自我评价的链式中介作用. 心理学进展, 12(1), 238-245.
[4] 尹开国(2024). 人工智能素养: 提出背景, 概念界定与构成要素. 图书与情报, (3), 60-68.
[5] 尹巧(2025). 大学生领悟社会支持对生活满意度的影响: 生命意义感和积极心理资本的链式中介作用. 社会科学前沿, 14(1), 576-587.
[6] 袁磊, 徐济远, 叶薇(2023). AIGC时代的数智公民素养: 内涵剖析、培养框架与提升路径. 现代教育技术, 33(9), 5-15.
[7] 张文娟, 邹泓, 梁钰苓(2012). 青少年父母支持的特点及其对社会适应的影响: 情绪智力的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 28(2), 160-166.
[8] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[9] Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The Influence of Motivation and Adaptation on Students’ Subjective Well-Being, Meaning in Life and Academic Performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 201-216.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474
[10] Baumgartner, H., & Weijters, B. (2012). Commentary on “Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies”. Journal of Retailing, 88, 563-566.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.003
[11] Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2009). Self-Theories and Motivation. In K. R. Wentzel, & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 123-140). Routledge.
[12] Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256
[13] Hayes, A F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. Guilford Press.
[14] Holmgreen, L., Tirone, V., Gerhart, J. et al. (2017). Conservation of Resources Theory: Resource Caravans and Passageways in Health Contexts. In C. L. Cooper, & J. C. Quick (Eds.), The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice (pp. 443-457). John Wiley & Sons.
[15] Liu, S., Ping, Z., Fan, C., Mo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2026). Impact of Growth Mindset on College Students’ Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy: The Chain-Mediating Roles of Perceived Social Support and Meaning in Life. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1710494.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1710494
[16] Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). ACM.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
[17] Ma, S., & Chen, Z. (2024). The Development and Validation of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale for Chinese College Students (AILS-CCS). IEEE Access, 12, 146419-146429.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3468378
[18] Martinez-Lopez, Z., Tinajero, C., Rodriguez, M. S., & Paramo, M. F. (2019). Perceived Social Support and University Adjustment among Spanish College Students. European Journal of Psychology and Educational Research, 2, 21-30.
https://doi.org/10.12973/ejper.2.1.21
[19] Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI Competency Framework for Students. UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
[20] Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI Literacy: An Exploratory Review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article ID: 100041.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
[21] Saleem, M., Amin, Z., Siddique, H. et al. (2026). Social Support, AI Literacy, and Well-Being among University Students. Policy Journal of Social Science Review, 4, 104-108.
https://policyjssr.com/index.php/PJSSR/article/download/713/690
[22] Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80-93.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
[23] Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Impact of Perceived Social Support on E-Learning Engagement among College Students: Serial Mediation of Growth Mindset and Subjective Well-Being. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 4163-4180.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00853-2
[24] Wu, C., Liu, X., Liu, J., Tao, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). Strengthening the Meaning in Life among College Students: The Role of Self-Acceptance and Social Support—Evidence from a Network Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1433609.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433609
[25] Zhang, S. S., Zhang, W. H., Yong, S. H., & Chen, J. T. (2025). Network Analysis of Meaning in Life, Perceived Social Support, and Depressive Symptoms among Vocational Undergraduate Students. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, Article 1510255.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1510255
[26] Zhou, S., Jiang, L., Li, W., & Leng, M. (2025). Meaning in Life from a Cultural Perspective: The Role of Cultural Identity, Perceived Social Support, and Resilience among Chinese College Students. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article No. 91.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04424-8
[27] Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2