中国对东南亚矿业工程项目投资效率研究
Research on the Investment Efficiency of China in Mining Projects in Southeast Asia
摘要: 在“一带一路”国际工程合作深化的背景下,东南亚已成为我国矿业工程出海的核心承载区域。为系统评估我国对东南亚矿业工程项目的投资效率,本文选取东南亚10国2015~2024年面板数据,构建包含资本、劳动双投入与工程建设、贸易效益、碳排放三产出的评价体系,采用超效率DEA模型测算静态投资效率并分析时空演化特征,结合全局Malmquist-Luenberger (GML)指数从动态视角分解绿色全要素生产率的驱动来源。研究发现:① 我国对东南亚矿业工程整体投资效率呈“先降后升”的波动特征,国别分化显著,新加坡、老挝、文莱处于高效梯队,印度尼西亚、菲律宾、缅甸等国长期处于低效区间;② 规模效率差异是效率分层的核心来源,多数资源丰裕国呈现规模报酬递减特征,而欠发达工程市场仍处于规模报酬递增阶段;③ 动态视角下绿色全要素生产率的增长主要由技术进步驱动,对效率改善的贡献相对有限,技术追赶效应尚未充分释放。研究从差异化工程布局、全流程项目管控、绿色技术协同等维度提出优化路径,可为我国矿业工程企业出海布局与效率提升提供决策参考。
Abstract: Under the background of the deepening of international engineering cooperation under the “Belt and Road Initiative”, Southeast Asia has become the core region for China’s mining engineering projects to go global. To systematically evaluate the investment efficiency of China’s mining engineering projects in Southeast Asia, this paper selects panel data of 10 Southeast Asian countries from 2015 to 2024, constructs an evaluation system including capital and labor input, construction engineering, trade benefits, and carbon emissions as three outputs, and uses the super-efficiency DEA model to calculate the static investment efficiency and analyze the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics. Combined with the global Malmquist-Luenberger (GML) index, it decomposes the driving sources of green total factor productivity from a dynamic perspective. The research findings are as follows: ① The overall investment efficiency of China’s mining engineering projects in Southeast Asia shows a fluctuating pattern of “first decline then rise,” with significant country differentiation. Singapore, Laos, and Brunei are in the efficient, while Indonesia, the Philippines, and Myanmar have been in the low-efficiency range for a long time; ② The difference in scale efficiency is the core source of efficiency stratification. Most resource-abundant countries exhibit a feature of decreasing scale returns, while underdeveloped engineering markets are still in the stage of increasing scale returns; ③ From a dynamic perspective, the growth of green total factor productivity is mainly driven by technological progress, and the contribution of efficiency improvement is relatively limited, and the effect of technological catch-up has not been fully released. The research proposes optimization paths from dimensions such as differentiated engineering layout, full-process project management, and green technology collaboration, which can provide decision-making references for Chinese mining engineering enterprises’ overseas layout and efficiency improvement.
文章引用:许玉林. 中国对东南亚矿业工程项目投资效率研究[J]. 现代管理, 2026, 16(11): 108-119. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2026.1611258

参考文献

[1] 赵琪. 中国对非洲矿业投资现状分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(1): 7-12.
[2] 宋科余. 基于超效率DEA模型的我国矿业非洲地区投资效率评价研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(12): 48-54.
[3] 田泽, 施滢滢, 任芳容, 等. 中国对“一带一路”亚非欧重点国家直接投资效率评价研究——基于动态DEA方法[J]. 工业技术经济, 2021, 40(4): 29-37.
[4] 许东梅. “绿色丝绸之路”背景下中国对沿线国家绿色投资的效率评价[J]. 生产力研究, 2020(9): 23-26, 82.
[5] 霍林, 蔡楚岸, 黄俊杰. 动态视角下的中国对东盟OFDI效率——基于超效率DEA-Tobit的实证分析[J]. 投资研究, 2021, 40(4): 17-28.
[6] 王晓磊, 傅哲宜, 贾纯瑶, 等. 基于DEA的内蒙古煤炭企业投资效率实证研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2019, 28(6): 23-28.
[7] 刘满芝. 煤炭企业投资效率的所有制差异研究[J]. 中国煤炭, 2018, 44(7): 15-20.
[8] 王宇纯. 基于DEA模型的石油公司投资效率研究[J]. 市场周刊, 2025, 38(8): 17-20.
[9] 宁杰. 全球供应链重构下的我国矿业对外直接投资转型: 基于投资模式和效率研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
[10] 魏权龄. 数据包络分析(DEA) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
[11] 秦颖, 孙彦亮. 基于超效率DEA-Malmquist指数模型: 我国上市建筑企业融资效率研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2025, 39(2): 14-20.
[12] 王成军, 魏向峰. 基于超效率三阶段SBM模型的建筑业碳排放效率研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2024, 38(6): 19-25.
[13] 王丹, 宫佳楠. 基于三阶段DEA模型的建筑业绿色技术创新效率测度研究: 以辽宁省为例[J]. 工程管理学报, 2026, 40(1): 45-50.
[14] 李文杰, 梁化康, 刘霖. 基于DEA-Tobit模型的建筑业安全生产效率演变机制研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2025, 39(6): 26-32.
[15] 邵帅, 范美婷, 杨莉莉. 资源产业依赖如何影响经济发展效率?——有条件资源诅咒假说的检验及解释[J]. 管理世界, 2013, 29(2): 32-63.
[16] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[17] Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984) Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
[18] Andersen, P. and Petersen, N.C. (1993) A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 39, 1261-1264.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
[19] Chung, Y.H., Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S. (1997) Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229-240.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146
[20] Oh, D.H. (2010) A Global Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 183-197.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0178-y
[21] Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, S.S. and Yaisawarng, S. (2002) Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157-174.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013548723393
[22] 张熠, 王先甲. 基于G_1-法和改进DEA的工程项目评标方法[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(3): 136-141.
[23] 唐玲, 杨正林. 能源效率与工业经济转型: 基于中国1998-2007年行业数据的实证分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2009, 26(10): 34-48.
[24] 郑明贵, 胡志亮. 海外矿业投资环境风险评价研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 26(5): 596-604.