合理使用视角下生成式人工智能训练数据著作权风险与制度完善
Copyright Risks and Institutional Perfection of Generative AI Training Data from the Perspective of Fair Use
摘要: 生成式人工智能技术快速发展,训练数据著作权合规风险日益凸显,其数据驱动运行模式与现行著作权法律规范产生结构性冲突。针对人工智能数据输入、数据分析、内容生成全流程存在的著作权侵权争议,结合我国封闭式立法模式下合理使用规则难以适配大规模模型训练的现实困境,区分表达性行为与非表达性行为展开规范分析,尝试搭建“非享受性使用”与“转换性使用”联动的动态评估机制。研究发现,现有合理使用条款受制于适当引用、少量复制等适用条件,无法覆盖人工智能深度学习场景。依托现有立法修订路径,可在《著作权法实施条例》中增设人工智能深度学习对应的合理使用情形,并配套建立以使用性质与转换程度为核心的反向校验规则,为平衡技术发展与著作权人权益提供规范思路。
Abstract: With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), copyright compliance risks concerning training data have become increasingly prominent. Its data-driven operation model creates structural conflicts with the existing copyright legal norms. In view of copyright infringement disputes arising throughout the whole process of artificial intelligence data input, data analysis and content generation, this paper conducts normative analysis by distinguishing expressive acts from non-expressive acts, considering the practical dilemma that fair use rules under China’s closed legislative model can hardly adapt to large-scale model training. It attempts to construct a dynamic evaluation mechanism combining “non-consumptive use” and “transformative use”. The study finds that the existing fair use provisions, constrained by application prerequisites such as appropriate quotation and partial reproduction, fail to cover the deep learning scenarios of artificial intelligence. Relying on the path of revising current legislation, a fair use circumstance corresponding to AI deep learning may be added to the Regulations for the Implementation of the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China, with supporting reverse verification rules centered on the nature of use and the degree of transformation. This provides normative ideas for balancing technological development and the rights and interests of copyright holders.
文章引用:冼天祺. 合理使用视角下生成式人工智能训练数据著作权风险与制度完善[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(11): 63-70. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.1411304

参考文献

[1] 王新雷, 饶宇锋. 数智时代的关键基础设施: 开源大模型普及的潜在风险与防范进路——以DeepSeek为例[J]. 决策咨询, 2025(2): 64-69+77.
[2] [以]赫拉利. 智人之上: 从石器时代到AI时代的信息网络简史[M]. 北京: 中信出版集团股份有限公司, 2024.
[3] 吴汉东. 人工智能生成作品的著作权法之问[J]. 中外法学, 2020, 32(3): 653-673.
[4] 金宇菲. 生成式人工智能训练数据著作权侵权风险及应对[J]. 出版与印刷, 2025(3): 38-49.
[5] 张妍. 数据纠纷知识产权规制路径的构建[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 37(5): 64-73.
[6] 焦和平. 人工智能创作中数据获取与利用的著作权风险及化解路径[J]. 当代法学, 2022, 36(4): 128-140.
[7] 张吉豫, 汪赛飞. 大模型数据训练中的著作权合理使用研究[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2024, 27(4): 20-33.
[8] 李燕. 《著作权法》修改背景下合理使用制度的完善路径[J]. 出版发行研究, 2019(4): 56-58+67.
[9] 金海军. 合理使用认定中“转换性使用”的重新界定——基于“戈德史密斯案”的思考[J]. 中国版权, 2024(2): 36-50.
[10] 王文敏. 人工智能对著作权限制与例外规则的挑战与应对[J]. 法律适用, 2022(11): 152-162.
[11] 徐聪颖. 著作权法规制生成式人工智能数据训练行为的理论争议与路径选择[J]. 河北法学, 2026, 44(3): 97-113.
[12] 申卫星. 数据产权的力度和限度[J]. 东方法学, 2025(1): 32-45.
[13] 黄汇, 翟鹏威. 公共领域视野下大模型数据使用行为的著作权定性[J]. 知识产权, 2025(1): 94-110.
[14] Fiil-Flynn, S.M., Butler, B., Carroll, M., Cohen-Sasson, O., Craig, C., Guibault, L., et al. (2022) Legal Reform to Enhance Global Text and Data Mining Research: Outdated Copyright Laws around the World Hinder Research. Science, 378, 951-953.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add6124
[15] 袁帅. 数字化背景下作品非表达性使用的著作权法应对[J]. 知识产权, 2024(9): 110-126.