深层页岩储层CO2复合压裂裂缝扩展机理研究
Study on Fracture Propagation Mechanism of CO2 Hybrid Fracturing in Deep Shale Reservoirs
摘要: 深层页岩储层地应力水平高,裂缝扩展受地应力与岩体非均质性共同影响。在CO2前置压裂与后续水力压裂过程中,前置裂缝的形成及其对后续流体通道的改变,使裂缝扩展同时受到流体性质、注入条件和已有裂缝分布的影响。为了明确前置CO2造缝与后续水力扩展之间的关系,本文基于有限–离散元方法建立二维热流固耦合模型,通过重启动开展两阶段连续计算,研究固定总注入量下不同排量及水平地应力差条件下的裂缝扩展规律。结果表明,CO2压裂较水压裂形成更多近井及主裂缝附近的分支,后续注水沿前置主缝和部分支缝继续扩展;提高CO2排量使终态裂缝长度与开度增加,其中开度变化更为明显;较低地应力差有利于多方向分支发育,较高地应力差下优势主缝延伸更加突出,前置分支仍对后续扩展产生影响。研究结果可为深层页岩储层CO2前置注入与后续水力压裂的参数选择提供依据。
Abstract: High in-situ stress and rock heterogeneity jointly affect fracture propagation in deep shale reservoirs. During CO2 prepad and subsequent hydraulic fracturing, the fractures created in the prepad stage alter the flow paths for subsequent injection, linking fracture growth to fluid properties, injection conditions and pre-existing fracture geometry. To clarify the connection between the two stages, a two-dimensional thermal-hydraulic-mechanical model is established using the finite-discrete element method. A restart procedure enables continuous simulation of CO2 prepad and subsequent water injection. Fracture propagation is examined at different injection rates under a fixed total injection volume and at different horizontal stress differences. The results show that CO2 fracturing produces more branches near the injection point and main fractures than water fracturing. Subsequent water injection extends the prepad main fractures and some branches. Increasing CO2 injection rate increases final fracture length and aperture, with a more pronounced change in aperture. Lower stress differences favor multidirectional branching, whereas higher differences produce more distinct main-fracture paths while retaining the influence of prepad branches. The findings provide a basis for selecting injection parameters for CO2 prepad and subsequent hydraulic fracturing in deep shale reservoirs.
文章引用:刘一凡, 李伊扬. 深层页岩储层CO2复合压裂裂缝扩展机理研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(6): 1566-1575. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.146155

参考文献

[1] 卢义玉, 周军平, 鲜学福, 等. 超临界CO2强化页岩气开采及地质封存一体化研究进展与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(6): 60-73.
[2] Ribeiro, L.H., Li, H. and Bryant, J.E. (2016) Use of a CO2-Hybrid Fracturing Design to Enhance Production from Unpropped-Fracture Networks. SPE Production & Operations, 32, 28-40.
https://doi.org/10.2118/173380-pa
[3] 王博, 颜廷巍, 杨柳, 等. 非常规储层CO2前置压裂技术研究进展[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 57(4): 55-68.
[4] Ishida, T., Aoyagi, K., Niwa, T., Chen, Y., Murata, S., Chen, Q., et al. (2012) Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing Laboratory Experiment with Supercritical and Liquid CO2. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, L16309.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl052788
[5] 卢义玉, 廖引, 汤积仁, 等. 页岩超临界CO2压裂起裂压力与裂缝形态试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(1): 175-180.
[6] Song, X., Guo, Y., Zhang, J., Sun, N., Shen, G., Chang, X., et al. (2019) Fracturing with Carbon Dioxide: From Microscopic Mechanism to Reservoir Application. Joule, 3, 1913-1926.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.004
[7] 杜布戈, 张广清, 周大伟, 等. CO2-水作用对层状页岩拉伸破坏影响的微观损伤研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 59-67.
[8] Yan, C., Xie, X., Ren, Y., Ke, W. and Wang, G. (2022) A FDEM-Based 2D Coupled Thermal-Hydro-Mechanical Model for Multiphysical Simulation of Rock Fracturing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 149, Article ID: 104964.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104964
[9] 杨兆中, 刘建平, 易良平, 等. 基于内聚力相场法的超临界CO2压裂模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2025, 44(12): 3184-3197.
[10] 白冰, 陈勉, 金衍. 超临界CO2渗流的流-固-热多场耦合机理研究[J]. 中国科学: 物理学∙力学∙天文学, 2023, 53(2): 101-113.
[11] 敖翔, 赖粮丰, 陆朝晖, 等. 深层页岩超临界CO2前置压裂裂缝扩展机制[J]. 煤炭学报, 2025, 50(9): 4235-4246.
[12] 崔传智, 钱银, 吴忠维, 等. 页岩油藏CO2前置压裂对裂缝网络的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2026, 33(2): 72-78.
[13] 杨兵, 黄海, 王海柱, 等. 超临界CO2压裂对储层渗透率的适应性研究[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 57(1): 79-91.
[14] Span, R. and Wagner, W. (1996) A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple-Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 25, 1509-1596.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555991
[15] Fenghour, A., Wakeham, W.A. and Vesovic, V. (1998) The Viscosity of Carbon Dioxide. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 27, 31-44.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.556013