电商平台“内卷式”价格竞争的生成机制与福利影响——基于平台流量分配规则的理论述评
Generation Mechanism and Welfare Effects of “Involution-Style” Price Competition on E-Commerce Platforms—A Theoretical Review Based on Platform Traffic Allocation Rules
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.15111217, PDF,   
作者: 韩永银:南京林业大学人文社会科学学院、生态文明传播学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 电商平台;内卷式竞争;价格竞争;流量分配;福利分析;E‑Commerce Platform; Involution‑Style Competition; Price Competition; Traffic Allocation; Welfare Analysis
摘要: 在存量竞争加剧的背景下,电商平台“内卷式”价格竞争已从短期市场现象演变为结构性问题。本文以平台流量分配规则为核心,运用产业组织理论对电商平台“内卷式”价格竞争的生成机制与福利影响进行理论述评。研究发现,生成机制表现为“平台侧–商户侧–平台间”三层次传导:平台通过“流量胁迫”将价格与流量挂钩;商户被迫持续降价;平台间补贴博弈形成“双方都补贴”的纳什均衡。福利影响方面,消费者短期获益但长期面临“低价–低质–消费降级”风险;商家福利损失最集中,中小商户尤甚;社会总福利因资源配置扭曲、动态效率下降及产业链负向传导而呈现净损失。“内卷式”竞争不同于正常价格竞争,是平台权力下商户策略空间被压缩的系统性结果。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of intensifying competition in a stagnant market, “involution-style” price competition on e-commerce platforms has evolved from a short-term market phenomenon into a structural issue. Focusing on platform traffic allocation rules and applying industrial organization theory, this paper provides a theoretical review of the generation mechanism and welfare effects of such competition. The findings reveal a three-layer transmission mechanism: at the platform level, “traffic coercion” links price to traffic allocation; at the merchant level, sellers are forced into continuous price cuts; at the inter-platform level, subsidy competition leads to a Nash equilibrium in which both platforms subsidize. In terms of welfare effects, consumers gain in the short run but face long-term risks of a “low price - low quality - consumption downgrade” spiral. Merchants, especially small and medium-sized ones, suffer the most concentrated welfare losses. Total social welfare exhibits a net loss due to distorted resource allocation, impaired dynamic efficiency, and negative chain effects along the industrial chain. “Involution-style” price competition differs from normal price competition and is the systemic result of compressed strategic space for merchants under platform power.
文章引用:韩永银. 电商平台“内卷式”价格竞争的生成机制与福利影响——基于平台流量分配规则的理论述评[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(11): 121-126. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.15111217

参考文献

[1] 黄群慧, 叶其楚. 中国制造业“内卷式”竞争现象及其形成机制研究[J]. 改革, 2025(6): 13-27.
[2] 王勇, 王垚圻. 平台内竞争及其福利影响[J]. 学术月刊, 2025, 57(8): 35-44.
[3] 白晨. “平台驱动型内卷”: 内涵、机制、监管挑战与治理对策[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2025(11): 16-23.
[4] 邹开亮. 平台企业“内卷式”低价竞争的四维路径与法律规制[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2025(7): 50-56.
[5] 欧阳日辉, 刘璇. 数字平台“内卷式”竞争的发生机制、潜在风险与破解对策[J]. 财经问题研究, 2025(3): 3-19.
[6] 许恒, 张国栋. 流量导向还是创新导向?——平台经济场景下的企业竞争策略与福利分析[J]. 经济评论, 2026(1): 85-100.
[7] 王海成. 外卖平台补贴竞争的内卷机制及其市场影响研究——基于堂食与外卖并存的博弈模型[J]. 中国物价, 2026(4): 40-47+54.
[8] 殷继国. 平台滥用规则行为的反不正当竞争法规制[J]. 比较法研究, 2025(5): 125-139.
[9] 冯博, 刘龙. 直播电商最低价协议的竞争机制与法律规制研究[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026(2): 118-129.
[10] 刘志彪, 王兵. 中国制造业“内卷式”恶性竞争的发生机制与破解路径[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024(12): 3-15.
[11] 伍佳敏. 银发经济中的信息不对称对老年消费维权困境的影响机制及其治理路径[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(5): 407-415.
https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.135269