油气混合相表观密度与分离筒锥角对旋流气浮装置流场及分离性能的数值研究
Numerical Study of the Effects of Oil-Gas Mixture Apparent Density and Separation-Chamber Cone Angle on Flow and Separation Performance in a Swirling Flotation Device
摘要: 为明确油气混合相表观密度与分离筒锥角对旋流气浮装置流动及分离性能的影响,建立三维Eulerian两相数值模型,对基准流场进行分析,并设置700、720、740、760和780 kg/m3五组表观密度以及90˚、88˚、86˚和84˚四组分离筒锥角进行对比。结果表明,装置内可形成稳定的三维螺旋流动和由外向内降低的径向压力梯度。表观密度由700 kg/m3增至780 kg/m3时,切向速度和轴向速度变化较小,但径向滑移速度平均绝对值降低约24%,分离效率由92.99%降至57.03%,油相富集倍数由22.28降至13.35。锥角变化对流场影响具有明显空间性,其中90˚工况的分离效率约为76%,油相富集倍数约为17.35,综合性能最佳。研究表明,表观密度主要通过改变两相相对迁移影响分离性能,760 kg/m3可作为具有工程代表性的基准表观密度;在本文研究范围内,90˚分离筒为较优结构。
Abstract: To clarify the effects of oil-gas mixture apparent density and separation-chamber cone angle on the flow and separation performance of a swirling flotation device, a three-dimensional Eulerian two-phase numerical model was established. The baseline flow field was analyzed, and five apparent densities (700, 720, 740, 760, and 780 kg/m3) and four cone angles (90˚, 88˚, 86˚, and 84˚) were compared. The device developed a stable three-dimensional swirling flow with a radial pressure gradient decreasing toward the center. As the apparent density increased from 700 to 780 kg/m3, the tangential and axial velocities changed only slightly, whereas the mean absolute radial slip velocity decreased by about 24%, the separation efficiency fell from 92.99% to 57.03%, and the oil enrichment factor decreased from 22.28 to 13.35. The cone-angle effect was spatially dependent, and the 90˚ configuration showed the best overall performance, with a separation efficiency of about 76% and an oil enrichment factor of about 17.35. These results indicate that apparent density mainly affects separation through interphase relative migration; 760 kg/m3 is suitable as a representative baseline apparent density, and the 90˚ separation chamber is preferred within the investigated range.
文章引用:张智杰, 王长建, 李乾鹏. 油气混合相表观密度与分离筒锥角对旋流气浮装置流场及分离性能的数值研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2026, 15(11): 64-79. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2026.1511156

参考文献

[1] 伍远平, 刘凯文, 胡志强, 杨迅, 谭文锋, 李向伟. 紧凑型双级旋流气浮装置应用研究[J]. 石油和化工设备, 2026, 29(4): 89-92.
[2] 蔡小垒. 气浮旋流一体化水处理技术理论及工程应用研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2017.
[3] 陈家庆, 蔡小垒, 尚超, 等. 旋流气浮一体化技术在低含油污水处理中的应用[J]. 石油机械, 2013, 41(9): 62-66.
[4] 尚超, 王春升, 郑晓鹏, 等. 海上生产水处理用紧凑型气浮技术研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2015, 35(4): 81-84.
[5] 魏丛达, 吴奇霖, 史仕荧, 吴应湘, 许晶禹, 张健. 新型两级气浮旋流设备结构优化与性能研究[J]. 石油机械, 2016, 44(1): 103-107.
[6] 俞接成, 陈家庆, 王春升, 张明, 王建文, 尚超. 紧凑型气浮装置油水预分离区结构选型的数值研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2012, 12(5): 742-747.
[7] 王江云, 魏浩然, 李佳奇, 杨矞琦, 王娟. 旋流气浮装置内流动规律数值模拟[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2023, 39(3): 587-598.
[8] 何燚诚. 紧凑型双级旋流气浮装置结构设计优化[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2025.
[9] 韩旭, 陈家庆, 李锐锋, 尚超, 王春升. 含油污水处理用旋流气浮一体化设备的CFD数值模拟[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(4): 1087-1092.
[10] Schiller, L. and Naumann, A. (1933) Über die grundlegenden Berechnungen bei der Schwerkraftaufbereitung. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, 77, 318-320.
[11] Tomiyama, A., Tamai, H., Zun, I. and Hosokawa, S. (2002) Transverse Migration of Single Bubbles in Simple Shear Flows. Chemical Engineering Science, 57, 1849-1858.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00085-4
[12] Lopez de Bertodano, M., Lahey, R.T. and Jones, O.C. (1994) Turbulent Bubbly Two-Phase Flow Data in a Triangular Duct. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 146, 43-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)90319-0
[13] 陈涛涛, 邵天泽, 陈家庆, 等. 紧凑型旋流气浮一体化技术的国产化研究进展与主体结构浅析[J]. 北京石油化工学院学报, 2014, 22(2): 59-66.
[14] 李匡奚, 于佩潜, 王江云, 魏浩然, 郑志刚, 冯留海. 微气泡旋流气浮装置内流动分析与结构优化[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 223-234.
[15] 王乐, 何庆生, 王贵宾. 气旋浮技术处理炼油企业含油污水试验研究[J]. 中外能源, 2020, 25(12): 67-70.