复杂工程决策中关联个体动态有限妥协的最小调整共识方法
A Minimum-Adjustment Consensus Method with Dynamic Limited Compromise of Associated Individuals for Complex Engineering Decision-Making
摘要: 复杂工程研发与方案评审通常需要多领域个体协同参与,个体间潜在关联关系及妥协行为的动态变化会直接影响工程方案的共识形成与决策稳定性。针对关联关系未知以及妥协状态难以动态刻画的问题,本文提出一种考虑关联个体动态有限妥协的最小调整共识方法。首先,根据意见距离和有界置信识别潜在关联关系,并结合意见相似程度确定关联权重,由相关联成员意见形成个体关联意见;随后,根据个体自身意见与关联意见之间的差异学习初始妥协程度。当初始关联关系和妥协状态不能满足共识要求时,通过调整关联关系改变个体关联意见,并据此进一步调整妥协程度,同时以最小调整控制相对于初始状态的变化。最后,以抗癌候选药物筛选为案例进行验证。结果表明,所提出方法能够刻画关联关系变化对个体妥协行为的影响,并在控制调整幅度的同时促进群体共识达成。
Abstract: Complex engineering R&D and scheme evaluation often require coordinated judgments from individuals with heterogeneous expertise. In such settings, latent association relationships and dynamically changing compromise behavior can directly affect consensus formation and decision stability. To address unknown association relationships and dynamic compromise states, this study proposes a minimum-adjustment consensus method with dynamic limited compromise. Potential associations are first identified using opinion distance and bounded confidence, and association weights are determined by opinion similarity to form individual reference opinions. Initial compromise degrees are then learned from the differences between individual and reference opinions. If the initial state fails to meet the consensus threshold, association weights and compromise degrees are further adjusted while minimizing deviations from the initial state. An anticancer drug screening case shows that the proposed method can capture the effect of changing associations on compromise behavior and improve consensus with limited adjustment.
文章引用:苏群, 程栋. 复杂工程决策中关联个体动态有限妥协的最小调整共识方法[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2026, 15(6): 1189-1198. https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2026.156114

参考文献

[1] Zhang, Z., Gao, Y. and Li, Z. (2020) Consensus Reaching for Social Network Group Decision Making by Considering Leadership and Bounded Confidence. Knowledge-Based Systems, 204, Article ID: 106240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106240
[2] Li, Y., Kou, G., Li, G. and Peng, Y. (2022) Consensus Reaching Process in Large-Scale Group Decision Making Based on Bounded Confidence and Social Network. European Journal of Operational Research, 303, 790-802.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.040
[3] Qin, Y. and Li, G. (2024) Consensus Reaching with the Dynamic Hybrid Trust Network in Group Decision Making Based on an Extensive Bounded Confidence. Expert Systems with Applications, 255, Article ID: 124448.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124448
[4] Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Gao, L., Dong, Y. and Pedryczc, W. (2022) Consensus Reaching with Trust Evolution in Social Network Group Decision Making. Expert Systems with Applications, 188, Article ID: 116022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116022
[5] Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Pedrycz, W. and Dong, Y. (2023) Consensus Reaching Based on Social Influence Evolution in Group Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 53, 4134-4147.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2021.3139673
[6] Shen, Y., Ma, X., Xu, Z., Herrera-Viedma, E., Maresova, P. and Zhan, J. (2024) Opinion Evolution and Dynamic Trust-Driven Consensus Model in Large-Scale Group Decision-Making under Incomplete Information. Information Sciences, 657, Article ID: 119925.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119925
[7] Liu, B., Zhou, Q., Ding, R., Palomares, I. and Herrera, F. (2019) Large-Scale Group Decision Making Model Based on Social Network Analysis: Trust Relationship-Based Conflict Detection and Elimination. European Journal of Operational Research, 275, 737-754.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.075
[8] Chao, X., Kou, G., Peng, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. (2021) An Efficient Consensus Reaching Framework for Large-Scale Social Network Group Decision Making and Its Application in Urban Resettlement. Information Sciences, 575, 499-527.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.047
[9] Tan, X., Zhu, J., Palomares, I. and Liu, X. (2022) On Consensus Reaching Process Based on Social Network Analysis in Uncertain Linguistic Group Decision Making: Exploring Limited Trust Propagation and Preference Modification Attitudes. Information Fusion, 78, 180-198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.09.006
[10] Sun, J., Gong, Z., Zhang, D., Xu, Y. and Wei, G. (2023) A Robust Ordinal Regression Feedback Consensus Model with Dynamic Trust Propagation in Social Network Group Decision-Making. Information Fusion, 100, Article ID: 101952.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101952
[11] Li, Y., Huan, J., Shen, J., Chen, L., Cao, J. and Cheng, Y. (2025) Social Network Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Considering Dynamic Trust Relationships and Historical Preferences of Decision Makers in Opinion Evolution. Information Fusion, 117, Article ID: 102837.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102837
[12] Wu, J., Dai, L., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H. and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018) A Minimum Adjustment Cost Feedback Mechanism Based Consensus Model for Group Decision Making under Social Network with Distributed Linguistic Trust. Information Fusion, 41, 232-242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.012
[13] Cheng, D., Cheng, F., Zhou, Z. and Wu, Y. (2020) Reaching a Minimum Adjustment Consensus in Social Network Group Decision-Making. Information Fusion, 59, 30-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.004
[14] Qin, J., Wang, D. and Liang, Y. (2023) Social Network-Driven Bi-Level Minimum Cost Consensus Model for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making: A Perspective of Structural Holes. Information Sciences, 649, Article ID: 119678.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119678
[15] Tu, Y., Song, J., Xie, Y., Zhou, X. and Lev, B. (2024) Facilitating Large-Scale Group Decision-Making in Social Networks: A Bi-Level Consensus Model with Social Influence. Information Fusion, 105, Article ID: 102258.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102258
[16] Yuan, Y., Cheng, D. and Zhou, Z. (2021) A Minimum Adjustment Consensus Framework with Compromise Limits for Social Network Group Decision Making under Incomplete Information. Information Sciences, 549, 249-268.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.11.014
[17] Zhang, H., Liu, S., Li, C., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F. and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2025) Addressing the Influence of Limited Tolerance and Compromise Behaviors on the Social Trust Network Consensus-Reaching Process. Information Sciences, 686, Article ID: 121292.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.121292
[18] Zou, W., Wan, S. and Dong, J. (2024) Trust Evolution Based Minimum Adjustment Consensus Framework with Dynamic Limited Compromise Behavior for Probabilistic Linguistic Large Scale Group Decision-Making. Information Sciences, 652, Article ID: 119724.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119724
[19] 陶希闻, 江文奇, 王嘉丽, 等. 基于BA-BSO交互机制的自适应群体共识模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2023, 43(1): 234-250.
[20] 唐明, 廖虎昌, 徐泽水. 基于最大共识序列的子群关联型大群体决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(11): 3043-3054.
[21] 陈晓红, 张威威, 徐选华. 社会网络环境下基于犹豫度和一致性的大群体决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(5): 1178-1192.
[22] 徐选华, 张前辉. 社会网络环境下基于共识的风险性大群体应急决策非合作行为管理研究[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(10): 2497-2506.
[23] 赵萌, 李子超, 高美, 等. 基于Louvain方法的社会网络大群体决策交互共识模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(4): 152-161.