企业经济政策不确定性感知与企业价值:数字化转型的中介作用与数据资产的调节作用
Perceived Economic Policy Uncertainty and Firm Value: The Mediating Role of Digital Transformation and the Moderating Role of Data Assets
摘要: 基于2010~2024年中国A股上市公司45869个企业–年度观测,本文从年报管理层讨论与分析文本构建企业经济政策不确定性感知指标,采用双向固定效应、双重机器学习和工具变量等方法检验其企业价值效应。结果表明:不确定性感知总体上显著降低企业价值,并通过抑制数字化转型形成中介传导;数据资产交互项显著为负,其边际效应由低水平时的正向关联转为均值附近不显著和高水平时的负向关联,体现条件性调节。自贸区DID与PSM-DID的静态系数虽为正,但事件研究不支持平行趋势,故仅作探索性关联解释。研究从企业主观感知视角补充了政策不确定性的微观价值效应,并为数字化战略、数据治理和政策预期管理提供依据。
Abstract: Using 45,869 firm-year observations for Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2024, this study constructs firm-level perceived economic policy uncertainty measures from annual-report MD&A text. Two-way fixed effects, double machine learning, and instrumental-variable specifications show that perceived uncertainty is generally negatively associated with firm value. Digital transformation forms a mediating channel. The interaction with data assets is negative: the marginal association is positive at low data-asset levels, insignificant near the mean, and negative at high levels, indicating conditional rather than universal moderation. Conventional DID and PSM-DID estimates for pilot free trade zones are positive, but the event study rejects parallel trends; these estimates are therefore interpreted as exploratory associations, not causal effects. The evidence extends research on the firm-level value consequences of perceived policy uncertainty and informs digital strategy, data governance, and policy-expectation management.
文章引用:郝彬汝, 魏锋. 企业经济政策不确定性感知与企业价值:数字化转型的中介作用与数据资产的调节作用[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(11): 16-30. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.1611355

参考文献

[1] Gulen, H. and Ion, M. (2016) Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 29, 523-564.
[2] 高琦, 彭松林, 秦一博, 等. 经济政策不确定性、股价信息含量与权益资本成本[J]. 广东轻工职业技术大学学报, 2026, 25(1): 27-35.
[3] 刘张童, 史官清, 赵倚林. 经济政策不确定性与上市企业投资效率[J]. 经济界, 2026(2): 59-72.
[4] 聂辉华, 阮睿, 沈吉. 企业不确定性感知、投资决策和金融资产配置[J]. 世界经济, 2020, 43(6): 77-98.
[5] 方明月, 聂辉华, 阮睿, 等. 企业数字化转型与经济政策不确定性感知[J]. 金融研究, 2023(2): 21-39.
[6] 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144.
[7] 段华友, 徐海霞, 刘信睿, 等. 数字化转型对企业价值的影响研究——基于全要素生产率视角[J]. 财会通讯, 2026(10): 53-58.
[8] Ocasio, W. (1997) Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187-206.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::aid-smj936>3.0.co;2-k
[9] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z
[10] 薛安娜, 卢泓宇. 耐心资本对企业经济政策不确定性感知的影响研究[J]. 金融发展研究, 2025(12): 80-88.
[11] 王新利, 冯昊昱. 碳交易政策、碳绩效与高耗能企业价值——基于多时点DID模型的实证分析[J]. 生态经济, 2026, 42(4): 26-35.
[12] 陶锋, 朱盼, 邱楚芝, 等. 数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(5): 68-91.
[13] 路征, 周婷, 王理, 等. 数据资产与企业发展——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2023(4): 128-142.
[14] 杨利雄, 赵博雅, 李庆男. 企业数据要素投资的同群效应研究[J]. 管理学报, 2026, 23(4): 734-744.
[15] Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., et al. (2018) Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Treatment and Structural Parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21, C1-C68.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12097
[16] Knittel, C.R. and Stolper, S. (2021) Machine Learning about Treatment Effect Heterogeneity: The Case of Household Energy Use. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111, 440-444.
https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211090
[17] 张涛, 李均超. 网络基础设施、包容性绿色增长与地区差距——基于双重机器学习的因果推断[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(4): 113-135.
[18] 王亮, 王琦凯. 企业经济政策不确定性感知的传染效应: 基于年报文本挖掘和连锁董事网络的分析[J]. 计量经济学报, 2023, 3(2): 548-569.
[19] 上官泽明, 张瑶, 封振睿. 经济政策不确定性感知与国家审计功能发挥[J]. 当代会计评论, 2025, 2(2): 37-63.
[20] 陈强, 齐霁, 颜冠鹏. 双重差分法的安慰剂检验: 一个实践的指南[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(2): 181-220.
[21] 范钦钦, 邱静. 经济政策不确定性感知与管理层业绩预告[J]. 财会月刊, 2024, 45(16): 70-76.