|
[1]
|
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded Model of Visual Word Recognition and Reading Aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204[CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and Semantic Priming of Nonwords: Implications for Theories of N400 and Word Recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00120[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[3]
|
Günther, H., Gfroerer, S., & Weis, L. (1984). Inflection, Frequency, and the Word Superiority Effect. Psychological Research, 46, 261-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00308888[CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Henderson, L. (1974). A Word Superiority Effect without Orthographic Assistance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 301-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640747408400416[CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O’Rourke, T. (2002). An Elec-tro-Physiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938-950.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892902760191153[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[6]
|
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading: Cooperative Division of Labor between Visual and Phonological Processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662[CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology Re-veals Semantic Memory Use in Language Comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6[CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-Related Brain Potentials to Semantically Inappropriate and Surprisingly Large Words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(80)90046-0[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[9]
|
Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Better the DVL You Know: Acronyms Reveal the Contribution of Familiarity to Single Word Reading. Psychological Science, 18, 122-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01859.x[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[10]
|
Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). The Acronym Su-periority Effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1158-1163. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193106[CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2008). Minding the PS, Queues, and PXQs: Uniformity of Semantic Processing across Multiple Stimulus Types. Psychophysiology, 45, 458-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00636.x[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[12]
|
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part I. An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375[CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
Noice, H., & Hock, H. S. (1987). A Word Superiority Effect with Nonorthographic Acronyms: Testing for Unitized Visual Codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 485-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209756[CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
Prinzmetal, W., & Millis-Wright, M. (1984). Cognitive and Linguistic Factors Affect Visual Feature Integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 305-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(84)90012-4[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[15]
|
Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-Related Brain Potentials Dissociate Repetition Effects of High- and Low-Frequency Words. Memory & Cognition, 18, 367-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197126[CrossRef]
|
|
[16]
|
Rugg, M. D., & Nagy, M. E. (1987). Lexical Contribution to Nonword Repetition Effects: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials. Memory& Cognition, 15, 473-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198381[CrossRef]
|
|
[17]
|
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual Recognition as a Function of Mea-ningfulness of Stimulus Material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 274-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0027768[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[18]
|
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part 2. The Contextual Enhancement Effect and Some Tests and Extensions of the Model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.60[CrossRef]
|