Dickman冲动性量表在大学生中应用的信效度分析
Reliability and Validity of Dickman’s Impulsivity Inventory in Chinese College Students
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.612160, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 郑丽君, 张 婷：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: 冲动量表；功能型冲动；非功能型冲动；信度；效度；Impulsive Scale； Functional Impulsivity； Dysfunctional Impulsivity； Reliability； Validity
摘要: 目的：引进和修订Dickman冲动量表(Dickman’s Impulsivity Inventory, DII)，在大学生中，检验DII中文版的信度、效度。方法：对500名在校大学生进行Dickman冲动量表测查，并间隔四周后进行重测。结果：DII总量表内部一致性系数为0.649，分量表的内部一致性系数均在0.7以上；重测信度为0.748；与Buss和Perry攻击问卷显著相关；验证性因素分析显示结构拟合良好。结论：DII是一个比较好的评估冲动行为的工具。
Abstract: Objective: To introduce and revise Dickman impulse scale (Dickman’s Impulsivity Inventory, DII) and test its reliability and validity among college students. Methods: The DII was tested in 500 Chinese college students, and retested after four weeks. Results: The DII internal consistency coef-ficient is 0.649; subscales of internal consistency coefficients are above 0.7; retest reliability is 0.748; it has a significant correlation with the Buss and Perry attack questionnaire; confirmatory factor analysis showed that the structure fitting is good. Conclusion: The DII is a good tool for a better assessment of impulsive behavior.
文章引用：郑丽君, 张婷 (2016). Dickman冲动性量表在大学生中应用的信效度分析. 心理学进展, 6(12), 1267-1272. https://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2016.612160

参考文献

[1] 管琳(2008). Dickman冲动量表中文版在农村使用的信度、效度检验. 硕士论文, 大连医科大学, 大连.
[2] 李献云, 费立鹏, 张亚利, 牛雅娟, 童永胜, 杨少杰(2011). Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, (10), 607-613.
[3] Claes, L., Vertommen, H., & Braspenning, N. (2000). Psychometric Properties of the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 27-35.[CrossRef] 
[4] Dickman, S. (1985). Impulsivity and Perception: Individual Differ-ences in the Processing of the Local and Global Dimensions of Stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 133-149.[CrossRef] 
[5] Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and Dysfunctional Impul-sivity: Personality and Cognitive Correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95-102.[CrossRef] 
[6] Dickman, S. J., & Meyer, D. E. (1988). Impulsivity and Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Information Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 274-290.[CrossRef] 
[7] Evenden, J. L. (1999). Varieties of Impulsivity. Psychopharmacology, 146, 348-361.[CrossRef] 
[8] Lansbergen, M. M., Böcker, K. B., Bekker, E. M., & Kenemans, J. L. (2007). Neural Correlates of Stopping and Self- Reported Impulsivity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2089-2103.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Moeller, F. G., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., Schmitz, J. M., & Swann, A. C. (2001). Psychiatric Aspects of Impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1783-1793.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Pietrzak, R. H., Sprague, A., & Snyder, P. J. (2008). Trait Impulsiveness and Executive Function in Healthy Young Adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1347-1351.[CrossRef] 
[11] Piko, B. F., & Pinczés, T. (2014). Impulsivity, Depression and Aggression among Adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 33-37.[CrossRef] 
[12] Robbins, T. W., Gillan, C. M., Smith, D. G., de Wit, S., & Ersche, K. D. (2012). Neurocognitive Endophenotypes of Impulsivity and Compulsivity: Towards Dimensional Psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 81-91.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Vigil-Colet, A. (2007). Impulsivity and Decision Making in the Balloon Analogue Risk-Taking Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 37-45.[CrossRef] 
[14] Zhou, J., Witt, K., Chen, C., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Qiu, C., Cao, L., & Wang, X. (2014). High Impulsivity as a Risk Factor for the Development of Internalizing Disorders in Detained Juvenile Offenders. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55, 1157- 1164.[CrossRef] [PubMed]