核心边缘网络结构对银行系统稳定性影响研究
The CP Network Structure and Systemic Risk in Interbank Market
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2017.69132, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 杨明明, 范 宏, 宋 姗:东华大学,旭日工商管理学院信息管理与信息系统系,上海
关键词: 核心边缘网络模型动态演化银行系统存款冲击银行系统稳定性Core-Periphery Network Model Dynamical Evolutional Banking System Deposits Shocks Stability of Banking System
摘要: 银行间网络结构对银行系统的稳定性具有重要的影响,但目前的研究大多以随机网络结构来研究银行系统的稳定性,但是很多实证研究发现核心边缘网络是银行拆借市场的一种重要网络特征,因此本文构建核心边缘网络拓扑模型,然后建立动态演化的银行网络系统模型,从而研究核心边缘网络结构对银行系统稳定性的影响。结果表明:在边缘银行受到存款冲击的情形下,对比随机的网络结构,核心边缘的网络结构会使银行系统更稳定。在核心银行受到存款冲击的情形下,只有当连接度小并且核心银行总数少时,随机网络更稳定;当连接度小且核心银行总数大,或当连接度大时,核心边缘网络更稳定。
Abstract: The network topology structure of the interbank network has an important effect on the stability of bank system; most of the current researches study the effect of the random network on the stability of bank system. However many empirical investigations find that the core-periphery (CP) is an important network characteristic of the interbank market, therefore, the present paper constructs the CP network structure of the interbank market, and then constructs a dynamical evolutional bank network system model, furthermore studies the effect of CP network structure on the stability of the bank system. The research results show that when the periphery banks suffer from the deposits shocks, the CP network is more stable than the random network. However, when the core banks face the deposits shocks, there are three cases according to the connectivity of the banking system. In the case of the lower connectivity and small number of core banks, then the random network is more stable; in the case of the lower connectivity and big number of core banks, or in the case of the bigger connectivity, the CP network is more stable.
文章引用:杨明明, 范宏, 宋姗. 核心边缘网络结构对银行系统稳定性影响研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2017, 6(9): 1090-1097. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2017.69132

参考文献

[1] 陈国进, 马长峰. 金融危机传染的网络理论研究述评[J]. 经济学动态, 2010(2): 116 -120.
[2] Allen, F. and Gale, D. (2000) Financial Contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 1-33.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Freixas, X., Parigi, B. and Rochet, J.C. (2000) Systemic Risk, Interbank Relations and Liquidity Provision by the Central Bank. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 32, 611-640.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Boss, M., Elsinger, H. and Summer, M. (2004) The Network Topology of the Interbank Market. Quantitative Finance, 4, 677-684.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Gabrieli, S. (2011) The Microstructure of the Money Market before and after the Financial Crisis: A Network Perspective. CEIS Tor Vergata Research Paper Series, 9, No. 1.
[6] Iori, G., Demasi, G., Precup, O.V., et al. (2008) A Network Analysis of the Italian Overnight Money Market. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 32, 259-278.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Craig, B. and Von Peter, G. (2014) Interbank Tiering and Money Center Banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 23, 322-347.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Degryse, H. and Nguyen, G. (2007) Interbank Exposures: An Empirical Examination of Contagion Risk in the Belgian Banking System. International Journal of Central Banking, 3, 123-171.
[9] 高国华, 潘英丽. 基于资产负债表关联的银行系统性风险研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012, 26(4): 162-168.
[10] 邓晶, 曹诗男, 潘焕学, 秦涛. 基于银行间市场网络的系统性风险传染研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2013, 10(4): 76-85.
[11] 隋聪, 迟国泰, 王宗尧. 网络结构与银行系统性风险[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014, 17(4): 57-70.
[12] 蔡世民, 洪磊, 傅忠谦, 周佩玲. 基于复杂网络的金融市场网络结构实证研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2011, 8(3): 29-33.
[13] Krause, A. and Giansante, S. (2012) Interbank Lending and the Spread of Bank Failures: A Network Model of Systemic Risk. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83, 583-608.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 隋聪, 王宗尧. 银行间网络的无标度特征[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(12): 18-26.
[15] Stumpf, P.H. and Porter, M.A. (2012) Critical Truths about Power Laws. Science, 335, 665-666.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] in’t Veld, D. and van Lelyveld, I. (2014) Finding the Core: Network Structure in Interbank Markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 27-40.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Iori, G. (2006) Systemic Risk on the Interbank Market. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61, 525-542.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef