生物炭对黄壤养分含量及氮磷淋失的影响
Effects of Biochar on the Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrients and Leaching in Yellow Soil
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2017.76065, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄 娴, 张兴伟, 王震洪*:贵州大学生命科学学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 生物炭黄壤土壤养分氮磷淋失Biochar Yellow Soil Soil Nutrients Nitrogen and Phosphorus
摘要: 黄壤是贵州省农业生产主要土壤类型,特殊的土地条件与丰富的降雨造成土壤养分淋失,而且会引起水体污染。生物炭可以用来改善土壤环境和控制养分的淋失。然而,生物炭对黄壤中氮磷养分淋失的影响仍不是很清楚。本文采用室内土柱模拟淋溶方法,设置添加0 kg/m2 (B0)、2 kg/m2 (B2)、4 kg/m2 (B4)、6 kg/m2 (B6) 4个水平生物炭,研究4个处理对土壤养分含量及淋溶液体积、总氮、总磷、 淋失的影响。结果表明:土壤添加生物炭后,土壤pH、全氮、全磷、速效氮和速效磷含量随着生物炭添加量的增大而增加;添加生物炭的处理减少了水分的流失,添加2 kg/m2、4 kg/m2、6 kg/m2三个水平生物炭处理的累计淋溶液体积分别比未添加处理减少了0.3%、1.5%、2.0%;同等施肥条件下,添加生物炭处理与未添加相比,均显著降低了土壤淋溶液里TP、TN、 的累积淋失量,但以2 kg/m2处理降低效果最好。综上,黄壤中添加生物炭能够改善土壤和有效减少土壤养分的流失,其中有一个最适宜的生物炭添加量实现TP、TN、 淋失控制达到良好效果。
Abstract: Yellow soil is the main soil type supporting agricultural production in Guizhou Province. Special Karst geological conditions and abundant rainfall in Guizhou Province cause soil nutrients intense leaching, and water pollution. Biochar can be used to improve soil environments and to control nutrient leaching. However, effects of biochar on nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients and leaching in yellow soil remain unclear. We used soil columns containing 0 kg/m2 (B0), 2 kg/m2 (B2), 4 kg/m2 (B4) and 6 kg/m2 (B6) biochar to simulate the nitrogen and phosphorus leaching at laboratory and tested total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and in leachate and soil nutrient contents in soils. The results showed that soil pH, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, available nitrogen and available phosphorus increased with the increasing of biochar addition. The addition of biochar resulted in the reduction of loss of water. Under the application of 2 kg/m2, 4 kg/m2, 6 kg/m2 biochar to soils, the leachate volume decreased by 0.3%, 1.5% and 2.0% than those without adding biochar to soils, respectively. Under the same fertilization conditions, the addition of biochar significantly reduced TP, TN, and in leachate from soil columns than those without addition. The addition of 2 kg/m2 biochar to soils was optimum. In general, applying bio-char into yellow soil can improve soils and effectively reduce the loss of soil nutrients, and there is the most suitable biochar additions to achieve the TP, TN, , leaching control.
文章引用:黄娴, 张兴伟, 王震洪. 生物炭对黄壤养分含量及氮磷淋失的影响[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2017, 7(6): 509-517. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2017.76065

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 2009年中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2010.
[2] 李渝, 张雅蓉, 张文安, 等. 贵州黄壤地区不同施肥处理及降雨量对玉米产量的影响[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2015, 26(1): 230-235.
[3] 秦松, 范成五, 孙锐锋. 贵州土壤资源的特点、问题及利用对策[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2009, 37(5): 94-98.
[4] Xu, G., Lv, Y., Sun, J., et al. (2012) Recent Advances in Biochar Applications in Agricultural Soils: Benefits and Environmental Implications. Clean-Soil, Air, Water, 40, 1093-1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 房彬, 李心清, 赵斌, 钟磊. 生物炭对旱作农田土壤理化性质及作物产量的影响[J]. 生态环境报, 2014, 23(8): 1292-1297.
[6] 惠锦卓, 张爱平, 刘汝亮, 等. 添加生物炭对灌淤土土壤养分含量和氮素淋失的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2014, 35(2): 156-161.
[7] 邢英, 李心清, 王兵, 等. 生物炭对黄壤中氮淋溶影响: 室内土柱模拟[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(11): 2483-2488.
[8] Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Morris, S., et al. (2010) Effects of Biochar from Slow Pyrolysis of Papermill Waste on Agronomic Performance and Soil Fertility. Plant and Soil, 327, 235-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J. and Rondon, M. (2006) Biochar Sequestration in Terre-strial Ecosystems: A Review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 403-427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Vander Melen, D.T., Breeuwsma, A. and Bcers, P.C.M. (1998) Agricultural Nutrient Losses to Surface Water in the Netherlands: Impact, Strategies, and Perspective. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 4-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ruser, R., Flessa, H., Russow, R., et al. (2006) Emission of N20, N2 and CO2 from Soil Fertilized with Nitrate: Effect of Compaction, Soil Moisture and Rewetting. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38, 263-274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Luo, Y.M., Qiao, X.L., Song, J., et al. (2003) Use of a Multi-Layer Column Device for Study on Leachability of Nitrate in Sludge-Amended Soils. Chemosphere, 52, 1483-1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef