FFR、CFR对急性心肌梗死急诊冠脉介入术后患者预后的相关性研究
The Study of FFR and CFR for the Prognosis of Primary Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2017.75057, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 乔增勇, 马江伟, 刘化进, 曹 华, 张 立, 王宏伟, 熊三军, 杨立国:上海市奉贤区中心医院心内科,上海
关键词: 急性心肌梗死FFRCFR冠脉介入治疗Acute Myocardial Infarction FFR CFR PCI
摘要: 目的:探讨冠脉血流的功能性指标血流储备分数(FFR)、冠脉血流储备(CFR)对AMI急诊PCI术后患者的预后的影响。方法:选择2011年6月至2014年6月,在上海市奉贤区中心医院心内科就诊的急性心肌梗死患者56例,根据FFR及CFR界限值分4组:A组(15例):FFR ≥ 0.75,CRF ≥ 1.4;B组(11例):FFR ≥ 0.75,CFR < 1.4;C组(13例):FFR < 0.75,CRF ≥ 1.4;D组(17例):FFR < 0.75,CFR < 1.4。结果:经过平均6个月临床随访后,D组患者总的MACE事件发生率明显高于A,B,C组(P < 0.05),且主要体现在总死亡率的明显增高(17.6% VS. 0%, P < 0.01)。结论:AMI患者FFR,CFR均低于异常界限值时,MACE事件发生率高,应引起临床医师的高度关注。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of FFR and CFR on the prognosis of Primary Coronary Intervention (PCI) in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) emergency PCI. Methods: 56 cases with AMI were selected, according to the FFR and CFR boundary values of 4 groups: group A (15 cases): FFR ≥ 0.75, CRF ≥ 1.4; Group B (11 cases): FFR ≥ 0.75, CFR < 1.4; Group C (13 cases): FFR < 0.75, CRF ≥ 1.4; Group D (17 cases): FFR < 0.75, CFR < 1.4. Results: After an average of 6 months of clinical follow-up, the incidence of MACE in group D patients was significantly higher than that of A, B, and C (P < 0.05), and mainly reflected in a significant increase in total mortality (17.6% VS. 0%, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The incidence of MACE was high when the patients with AMI FFR and CFR were all below the abnormal threshold value, and should be highly concerned by clinicians.
文章引用:乔增勇, 马江伟, 刘化进, 曹华, 张立, 王宏伟, 熊三军, 杨立国. FFR、CFR对急性心肌梗死急诊冠脉介入术后患者预后的相关性研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2017, 7(5): 339-343. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2017.75057

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会心血管病学分会基础研究学组, 等. 冠状动脉微血管疾病诊断和治疗的中国专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2017(5): 420-430.
[2] Cuculi, F., De Maria, G.L., Meier, P., et al. (2014) Impact of Microvascular Obstruction on the Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve, Index of Microcirculatory Resistance, and Fractional Flow Reserve after ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, 1894-1904.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Takahashi, L., Hiasa, Y., Ohara, Y., et al. (2007) Usefulness of Coronary Flow Reserve Immediately after Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Predicting Long-Term Adverse Cardiac Event. American Journal of Cardiology, 100, 806-811.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Echavarria-Pinto, M., Van De Hoef, T.P., Serruys, P.W., et al. (2014) Facingthe Complexity of Ischaemic Heart Disease with Intracoronary Pressure and Flow Measurements: Beyond Fractional Flow Reserve Interrogation of the Coronary Circulation. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 29, 564-570.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Engstrøm, T., Kelbæk, H., Helqvist, S., et al. (2015) Complete Revascularisation versus Treatment of the Culprit Lesion Only in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease (DANAMI-3- PRIMULTI): An Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet, 386, 665-671.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 杜俣, 赵迎新. 冠状动脉血流储备分数研究进展[J]. 心肺血管病杂志, 2015(34): 875-878.