多重内隐序列学习与注意的关系:来自眼动的证据
The Relationship between Multiple Implicit Sequence Learning and Attention: Evidence from Eye Movements
摘要: 采用单因素(注意负荷:高、低)被试间实验设计,通过分心刺激操纵注意负荷,利用眼动技术,探讨注意与多重序列学习的关系。结果发现:1) 高注意负荷组的眼跳反应时长于低注意负荷组的;2) 高、低注意负荷组对主、次序列都发生了内隐序列学习;3) 主、次序列的内隐学习量差异不显著。研究结论:多重内隐序列学习不需要注意参与。
Abstract: The relationship between implicit sequence learning and attention was one of the basic questions in the study of implicit learning. Forty healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to high attention load condition and low attention load condition. Our data showed that: 1) Saccadic reaction time in high attentional load condition was longer than low attentional load condition’s; 2) primary sequence could be learned under both high and low attentional load condition; secondary sequence could be learned under both high and low attentional load condition; new sequence could not be learned under neither high nor low attentional load condition; 3) the sequence learning scores did not differ from primary sequence and secondary sequence. These findings suggested that there were not attentional limitations on the learning of multiple sequence learning.
文章引用:吕晓晶, 卢张龙 (2017). 多重内隐序列学习与注意的关系:来自眼动的证据. 心理学进展, 7(12), 1430-1435. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.712176

参考文献

[1] 付秋芳, 傅小兰(2006). 内隐序列学习与注意的关系. 心理科学进展, 14(6), 817-821.
[2] 郭秀艳(2003). 内隐学习. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[3] 卢张龙, 吕勇, 白学军(2011). 内隐序列学习不受注意负荷的影响: 来自眼动的证据. 心理与行为研究, 9, 214-218.
[4] 卢张龙, 吕勇, 沈德立(2011). 内隐序列学习与注意负荷关系的实验研究. 心理发展与教育, 27, 561-568.
[5] Deroost, N., Coomans, D., & Soetens, E. (2009). Perceptual Load Improves the Expression but Not Learning of Relevant Sequence Information. Experimental Psychology, 56, 84-91.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Franklin, M, S., Smallwood, J., Zedelius, C. M., Broadway, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2016). Unaware Yet Reliant on Attention: Experience Sampling Reveals That Mind-Wandering Impedes Implicit Learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 223-229.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Jiménez, L., & Vázquez1, G. A. (2005). Sequence Learning under Dual-Task Conditions: Alternatives to a Resource-Based Account. Psychological Research, 69, 352-368.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Kinder, A., Rolfs, M., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Sequence Learning at Optimal Stimulus-Response Mapping: Evidence from a Serial Reaction Time Task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 203-209.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and Confused? Selective Attention under Load. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 236-259.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Marcus, D. J., Karatekin, C., & Markiewicz, S. (2006). Oculomotor Evidence of Sequence Learning on the Serial Reaction Time Task. Memory and Cognition, 34, 420-432.[CrossRef
[11] Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.[CrossRef
[12] Rowland, L. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). Attention Modulates the Learning of Multiple Contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 643-648.[CrossRef
[13] Sævland, W., & Norman, E. (2016). Studying Different Tasks of Implicit Learning across Multiple Test Sessions Conducted on the Web. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 808.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Shanks, D. R. (2003). Attention and Awareness in Implicit Sequence Learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and Implicit Learning (pp. 11-42). Amsterdam: Benjamins.[CrossRef
[15] Shanks, D. R., Rowland, L. A., & Ranger, M. S. (2005). Attentional Load and Implicit Sequence Learning. Psychological Research, 69, 369-382.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Sloutsky, V. M., & Robinson, C. W. (2013). Redundancy Matters: Flexible Learning of Multiple Contingencies in Infants. Cognition, 126, 156-164.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Wierzchoń, M., Gaillard, V., Asanowicz, D., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Manipulating Attentional Load in Sequence Learning through Random Number Generation. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 179-195.[CrossRef