基于极限载荷与断裂强度的5A06铝合金焊接缺陷安全性评定的数值方法研究
Numerical Method Study on Safety Assessment of Welding Defects of 5A06 Aluminum Alloy Based on Ultimate Load and Fracture Strength
DOI: 10.12677/MS.2017.79103, PDF,  被引量    国家科技经费支持
作者: 颜虹州, 曾祥国, 陈华燕：四川大学建筑与环境学院，四川 成都；帅茂兵, 李玉斌：中国工程物理研究院，四川 绵阳
关键词: 数值模拟；5A06铝合金；平板焊接裂纹；FAD技术；安全性评估；Numerical Simulation； 5A06 Aluminum； Butt-Welded Plate Crack； FAD； Safety Assessment
摘要: 本文建立了一种针对5A06铝合金带焊接缺陷平板的安全性评定的数值方法。首先采用极限载荷分析法建立了极限应力和裂纹长度的定量关系，从而获得失效评估曲线(FAC)。对130 mm厚的5A06铝合金对接焊接平板，采用SINTAP标准获得焊接残余应力分布和残余应力强度因子,并用虚拟裂纹闭合技术(VCCT法)计算工作载荷作用下的应力强度因子，建立了5A06铝合金失效评估图(FAD)。论文提出的数值方法能够对给定缺陷条件下的承载能力进行安全性评定；相反，在给定外载荷条件下，对缺陷的容纳限值进行确定。
Abstract: In this paper, a numerical method for assessment the safety of 5A06 aluminum alloy strip with welded defects is established. First, the quantitative relationship between the limit stress and the length of the crack is established by the limit load analysis method, and then the failure assessment curve (FAC) can be obtained. For the 130 mm thick 5A06 Aluminum Alloy butt welding plate, welding residual stress distribution and residual stress intensity factor are obtained by SINTAP, and the stress intensity factor of the working load is calculated by the virtual crack closure tech-nique (VCCT method), then the 5A06 Aluminum Alloy failure assessment diagram (FAD) is estab-lished. The numerical method proposed in this paper can be used to evaluate the safety of the bearing capacity under the condition of a given defect. On the contrary, under the given external load conditions, the limitation of the defect can be determined.
文章引用：颜虹州, 曾祥国, 帅茂兵, 李玉斌, 陈华燕. 基于极限载荷与断裂强度的5A06铝合金焊接缺陷安全性评定的数值方法研究[J]. 材料科学, 2017, 7(9): 791-804. https://doi.org/10.12677/MS.2017.79103

参考文献

[1] Dowling, A.R. and Townley, C.H.A. (1975) The Effect of Defects on Structural Failure: A Two-Criteria Approach. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 3, 77-107.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Donzella, G. and Mazzu, A. (2012) Extension to Finite Life of a Failure Assessment Diagram for Contact Fatigue Loading. International Journal of Fatigue, 44, 217-224.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Flom, Y. (2012) Evaluation of Brazed Joints Using Failure Assessment Diagram. In: 5th International Brazing and Soldering Conference.
[4] Ainsworth, R.A. (1993) The Use of a Failure Assessment Diagram for Initiation and Propagation of Defects at High Temperature. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 16, 1091-1108.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Yu, Z., Zheng, Z. and Zhong, Q. (2012) Improved Re-liability Analysis Method Based on the Failure Assessment Diagram. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 25, 832-837.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Zhao, J.P., Huang, W.L. and Dai, S.H. (1997) A New Concept: Probabilistic Failure Assessment Diagram. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 71, 165-168.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Konosu, S. (2009) Assessment Procedure for Multiple Crack like Flaws in Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD). Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 131, 041402.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Bilby, B.A., Howard, I.C. and Li, Z.H. (1995) Failure Assessment Dia-grams. IV The Inclusion of Constraint Parameters. Proceedings Mathematical & Physical Sciences, 448, 281-291.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Budden, P.J. and Ainsworth, R.A. (2012) The Shape of a Strain-Based Failure Assessment Diagram. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 89, 59-66.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Ainsworth, R.A., Budden, P.J., Oh, C.Y., et al. (2013) The Treatment of Secondary Strains within a Strain-Based Failure Assessment Diagram. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 104, 14-20.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Mu, M.Y., Wang, G.Z., Xuan, F.Z., et al. (2017) Fracture As-sessment Based on Unified Constraint Parameter for Pressurized Pipes with Circumferential Surface Cracks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 175, 201-218.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Budden, P.J., Sharples, J.K. and Dowling, A.R. (2000) The R6 Procedure: Recent Developments and Comparison with Alternative Approaches. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 77, 895-903.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Garwood, S.J., Leggatt, R.H. and Ingham, T. (1997) Structural Collapse, the Failure Assessment Diagram and “Off-the-Shelf” Operation. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 17, 1418-31.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Zerbst, U., Hamann, R. and Beeck, F. (1998) Engi-neering Failure Assessment Methods Applied to Pressurised Components. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 200, 371-382.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Kanno, S., Hasegawa, K., Shimizu, T., et al. (1992) Analysis of Leak and Break Behavior in a Failure Assessment Diagram for Carbon Steel Pipes. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 138, 251-258.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Kim, Y.J., Shim, D.J., Huh, N.S., et al. (2004) Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Assessment of Test Data for Circumferential Cracked Pipes. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 71, 173-191.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Lee, J.S., Ju, J.B., Jang, J.I., et al. (2004) Weld Crack As-sessments in API X65 Pipeline: Failure Assessment Diagrams with Variations in Representative Mechanical Properties. Materials Science & Engineering A, 373, 122-130.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Cravero, S. and Ruggieri, C. (2006) Structural Integrity Analysis of Axially Cracked Pipelines using Conventional and Constraint-Modified Failure Assessment Diagrams. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 83, 607-617.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Pluvinage, G. (2006) Pipe-Defect Assessment Based on the Limit Analysis, Failure-Assessment Diagram, and Subcritical Crack Growth. Materials Science, 42, 127-139.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Kamaya, M. and Machida, H. (2010) Reference Stress Method for Evaluation of Failure Assessment Curve of Cracked Pipes in Nuclear Power Plants. International Journal of Pres-sure Vessels & Piping, 87, 66-73.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Oyamada, K., Konosu, S. and Ohno, T. (2011) Proposal of Ref-erence Stress for a Surface Flaw on a Cylindrical Component from a Review-with-Comparison of the Local Metal Loss Assessment Rule between API 579-1 and the p-M, Diagram Method. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Pip-ing, 88, 507-517.
[22] 潘建宾, 王国珍, 轩福贞, 等. 核压力容器接管安全端不同焊接结构的失效评定图[J]. 核技术, 2017, 40(5): 82-88.
[23] 王元清, 廖小伟, 周晖, 等. 基于SINTAP-FAD方法的含裂纹缺陷钢结构构件安全性评定研究[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(5): 42-51.
[24] Kim, Y.J., Kocak, M., Ainsworth, R.A., et al. (2000) SINTAP Defect Assessment Procedure for Strength Mis-Matched Structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 67, 529-546.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] 余阳春, 王春明, 余圣甫. 5A06铝合金的激光填丝焊接头组织与性能[J]. 激光技术, 2010, 34(1): 34-36.
[26] 王伟年. 不同应力状态5A06铝合金板材断裂预测[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
[27] Kirkwood, M.G., Carmichael, G.D.T. and Moffat, D.G. (1986) Finite Element Stress Analysis of an Equal Diameter Branch Pipe Intersection Subjected to Out-of-Plane and Twisting Moments. Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 21, 9-16.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Rajakumar, S. and Christopher, T. (2011) Fracture Strength of Centre Surface Cracked Tensile Specimens Made of 2219-T87 Al Alloy Welding. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 21, 2568-2575.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] 王生楠, 于红艳. 含裂纹结构的极限载荷分析[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2004, 23(7): 863-865.
[30] Leggate, R.H. and Sanderson, R.M. (1999) Stress Intensity Due to Residual Stresses. HSC Publications.
[31] 解德, 钱勤, 李长安. 断裂力学中的数值计算方法及工程应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
[32] Sung, P.H., Yang, W.H. and Kim, C. (2002) Stress Intensity Factors for Elliptical Arc through Cracks in Mechanical Joints by Virtual Crack Closure Technique. KSME International Journal, 16, 182-191.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐