大学生专业课学习动机及策略之比较实证研究
College Students’ Motivated Learning Strategies toward Their Majors: A Comparative Investigation
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2017.712180, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 童馥卉, 王卓莹, 闵 月：美国德克萨斯A&M大学教育与人文发展学院教育心理学系，美国 大学城；郭海涛：深圳大学传播学院，传媒与文化发展研究中心，广东 深圳
关键词: 大学生；专业课；学习动机；学习策略；方差分析；College Students； Majors； Learning Motivation； Learning Strategies； Analysis of Variance
摘要: 根据Pintrich的学习动机策略调查问卷并结合当代大学生专业课程学习的实际情况编译出《中国大学生学习动机及策略问卷》，选取505名本科生为调查对象，采取单因素方差分析方法，在信度和效度验证的基础上，重点探究不同性别、专业的学生在专业课学习动机和策略上的差异。研究结果显示：1) 女大学生比男大学生更善于合理安排学习时间以及制定高效科学的学习计划；2) 文科生考试焦虑感较低且更加重视课堂任务，而理科生在面对课程难点时压力较大，对时间的管理能力与文科生相比也略有不足。此项研究有助于有针对性地对学生进行学业指导，激发他们的学习动机，引导他们增强信心，创造多元学习方法；同时对于提升学生学习专业课的兴趣也有一定的启示意义。
Abstract: This research applied Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire-Adapted Chinese version for adult learners (MSLQ-CAL) questionnaire to investigate 501 college students’ learning motivation and strategies toward their disciplinary courses. MSLQ-CAL was generated based on exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with high internal consistency reliability. Analysis of variance was conducted to examine gender and major differences on the 6 factors within motivation domain and 9 factors within learning strategy domain. Results with B-H correction suggested that female students scored significantly higher on time management and organizational strategies; in addition, social science majors exhibited higher performance on task value, self-regulation, time management and self-regulation, as compared to science majors, who also scored significantly higher on test anxiety. These findings provide insight for college counselors and educators to provide targeted service and guidance to enhance male students and science majors’ learning motivation and the use of strategies to become effective learners and to be successful in future career.
文章引用：童馥卉, 郭海涛, 王卓莹, 闵月 (2017). 大学生专业课学习动机及策略之比较实证研究. 心理学进展, 7(12), 1462-1472. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.712180

参考文献

[1] 蔡濛萌, 薛福根(2016). 经济学双语课程中的学习行为与心理分析. 教书育人(高教论坛), 9, 027.
[2] 范培红, 孙隆儒(2017). 促进药学高年级学生学习动力的探讨. 药学教育, 33(4), 74-79.
[3] 高光珍, 贾天俊(2011). 大学生学习动机现状调查. 唐山师范学院学报, 33(5), 130-132.
[4] 何志伟, 颜事龙(2013). 专业课教学中学习动机的激发. 科技创新导报, (35), 126-127.
[5] 胡燕, 郑葵阳, 耿德勤, 蔡可化, 王虎, 杨耀东, 等(2009). 大学生学习策略的相关研究. 中国高等医学教育, 9, 52-54.
[6] 姜建忠, 黄芳(2017). 基于自我调节学习能力的本科新生学业指导需求分析——以在杭高校为例. 文教资料, (7), 172-173.
[7] 李凤杰, 刘文(2008). 大学生学习策略, 学习动机与学业成绩的关系. 教育探究, (4), 54-57.
[8] 刘小平, 唐贵忠(2015). 大学生学习态度的现状及新特点——基于重庆市6所高校的调查. 重庆与世界(学术版), 7, 100-103.
[9] 龙成志, 刘志梅, 吴喜雁(2017). 大学生自主学习策略对学习绩效的影响: 学习动机的调节作用. 心理技术与应用, (02), 89-98.
[10] 沈波, 俞滢, 王慧中(2010). 大学生生物化学自主学习能力的实践和探析. 高教论坛, 2, 56-57.
[11] 唐洁(2015). 大学生学习策略与学习方法分析. 吉林省教育学院学报: 下旬, 30(3), 26-27.
[12] 万俊, 郦华兴(2014). 高分子材料专业双语教学的探索与实践. 广东化工, 41(23), 165.
[13] 王普霞(2007). 大学生学习方式差异研究及其对成绩的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, (3), 226-229.
[14] 王琬琪, 何朝星, 王伟, 王亚博, 薛忠, 张晓琳(2017). 医药院校学生的学习动机和学业成绩的相关性研究. 教育教学论坛, (3), 41-42.
[15] 王悦辉(2013). 专业课程自主学习教学策略实践探讨. 赤峰学院学报: 自然科学版, (17), 222-224.
[16] 温颖(2015). 大学生学习倦怠调查与应对措施研究. 洛阳理工学院学报: 社会科学版, 30(6), 91-96.
[17] 翁俊, 刘繁, 汪建华, 熊礼威, 邓泉荣(2015). 浅析学习动机的引导在大学工科教学中的作用. 当代教育实践与教学研究 (电子版), (12X), 51.
[18] 肖英杰, 郑琛, 陈茂怀, 胡俊娴, 李丽萍(2017). 医学生家庭背景, 学医动机与学业成绩的相关分析. 中华全科医学, 15(5), 834-837. 阎铭, 周站(2010). 高校双语教学效果的心理影响因素研究. 华中农业大学学报 (社会科学版), 2010(6), 126-130.
[19] 阎铭, 周站(2010). 高校双语教学效果的心理影响因素研究. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(6), 126-130.
[20] 张鸽(2015). 大学生专业课自主学习现状的调查研究. 课程教育研究, (25), 160-161.
[21] 张力为, 符明秋(2000). 借用外国自陈量表的文化陷阱. 心理科学, 23(6), 729-731.
[22] 赵俊峰, 杨易, 师保国(2005). 大学生学习策略的发展特点. 心理发展与教育, (04).
[23] 郑磊, 张鼎权(2013). 中国教育性别差异的经济学研究评述. 妇女研究论丛, (2), 112-119.
[24] 中华人民共和国教育部(2005). 教育部关于进一步加强高等学校本科教学工作的若干意见. http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_1615/200708/25595.html
[25] 周海涛, 景安磊, 李子建(2014). 大学生学习策略使用水平及其影响因素分析. 中国高教研究, (4), 25-30.
[26] Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). Profiling the Differences in Students’ Knowledge, Interest, and Strategic Processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435-447.[CrossRef] 
[27] Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practicaland Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289-300.
[28] Büyüköztürk, S., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4, 231-239.
[29] Feiz, P., & Hooman, H. A., & Kooshki, Sh. (2013). Assessing the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in Iranian students: Construct Validity and Reliability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1820-1825.[CrossRef] 
[30] Liu, D. Y. (2004). EFL Proficiency, Gender and Language Learning Strategy Use among a Group of Chinese Technological Institute English Majors. ARECLS e-Journal, 1.
[31] Núñez, J. C., Cerezo, R., Bernardo, A., Rosário, P., Valle, A., Fernández, E., & Suárez, N. (2011). Implementation of Training Programs in Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Moodle Format: Results of an Experience in Higher Education. Psicothema, 23, 274-281.
[32] Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables Affecting Choice of Language Learning Strategies by University Students. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
[33] Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-Regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422/full[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Washington DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED).
[35] Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The Role of Motivation in Promoting and Sustaining Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.[CrossRef] 
[36] Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.[CrossRef] 
[37] Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., Valle, A., Trigo, L., & Guimarães, C. (2010). Enhancing Self-Regulation and Approaches to Learning in First-Year College Students: A Narrative-Based Program Assessed in the Iberian Peninsula. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 411-428.[CrossRef] 
[38] Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-Regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 85-94.[CrossRef] 
[39] Tong, F., Guo, H., Wang, Z., Guo, W., & Min, Y. (2017). Construct Validation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire—Chinese Version for Adult Learners (MSLQ-CAL): A Cross-Cultural Adaptation. Paper presented at Doctoral Seminar, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
[40] Yusuf, M. O., & Balogun, M. R. (2011). Student-Teachers’ Competence and Attitude towards Information and Communication Technology: A Case Study in a Nigerian University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2, 18-36.
[41] Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.[CrossRef] 
[42] Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a Structured Interview for Assessing Student Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.[CrossRef]