水源地保护区生态补偿的国内外研究述评
Review of Ecological Compensation in Water Source Protection Area at Home and Abroad
DOI: 10.12677/SD.2018.81005, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王爱敏：泰山医学院医药管理学院，山东 泰安
关键词: 水源地保护区；生态补偿；国内外研究；述评；Source Water Protection Area； Ecological Compensation； Research at Home and Abroad； Review
摘要: 从世界范围来看，对水源地保护区进行生态补偿被普遍认为是保护水源地生态环境比较有效的制度设计。本文从生态补偿的内涵、主客体界定、补偿标准和补偿方式等方面入手，对国内外学者们的研究成果进行了综述，通过分析发现，国外对于生态补偿的研究起步较早，已经切入到了理论应用和实证研究阶段，相对而言，我国对流域生态补偿的研究还处于探索阶段，相关研究起步较晚。目前国内学者们对于生态保护者的补偿研究居多，对于减少生态破坏者的补偿研究相对较少，而水源地保护区的设立，所面临的补偿问题多为对保护区内的土地所有者、企业和居民等这些减少生态破坏者的补偿问题，并且相关研究基本还是处于法规制度和理论政策的探讨阶段，还没有形成系统、完整的体系。
Abstract: It is generally considered as a more effective system design to protect the ecological environment of the water source land in the world. From the aspects of connotation, subject and object definition, compensation standard and compensation mode, this paper summarizes the research achieve- ments of domestic and foreign scholars. Through the analysis, it is found that the study of ecological compensation started early in foreign countries and has entered the stage of theoretical and empirical research. Comparatively speaking, the study of ecological compensation in China is still in the stage of exploration, and the related research is late. At present, the domestic scholars have mostly studied the compensation for ecological protectors, and the research on the compensation for reducing the ecological saboteurs is relatively less. The problem of compensation for the es-tablishment of water source protection area is mostly the compensation for reducing the ecological saboteurs, such as land owners, enterprises and residents in the protected area. And the related research is still in the stage of the legal system and the theoretical policy, and there is no systematic and complete system.
文章引用：王爱敏. 水源地保护区生态补偿的国内外研究述评[J]. 可持续发展, 2018, 8(1): 30-37. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2018.81005

参考文献

[1] Allen, A.O. and Feddema, J.J. (1996) Wetland Loss and Substitution by the Section 404 Permit Program in Southern Califonia.USA. Environmental Management, 22, 263-274.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Wunder, S. (2005) Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakar-ta.
[3] 马世骏. 生态规律在环境管理中的作用——略论现代环境管理的发展趋势[J]. 环境科学学报, 1981, 1(1): 95-99.
[4] 蒋中天. 关于建立农业环境污染和生态破坏补偿法规的探讨[J]. 农业环境保护, 1990, 9(2): 29-33.
[5] 庄国泰, 等. 中国生态环境补偿费的理论与实践[J]. 中国环境科学, 1995, 15(6): 413-417.
[6] 俞海, 任勇. 生态补偿的理论基础: 一个分析性框架[J]. 城市环境与城市生态, 2007, 20(2): 28-31.
[7] 王鑫, 张忠潮, 高琪. 对流域生态补偿内涵的法律思考[J]. 长春工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 26(6): 52-55.
[8] 李群. 东江流域水源保护区生态补偿机制的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 西北民族大学, 2007.
[9] 马兴华, 崔树彬, 安娟. 水源区生态补偿机制理论框架研究[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2011, 8(4): 87-89.
[10] 邓明翔. 滇池流域生态补偿机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南财经大学, 2012.
[11] 石利斌. 城市水源地生态补偿分区与管治研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学, 2014.
[12] 李森, 丁宏伟, 何佳, 等. 昆明市清水海水源保护区生态补偿机制探讨[J]. 环境保护科学, 2015, 41(3): 126-131.
[13] 葛颜祥, 梁丽娟, 接玉梅. 水源地生态补偿机制的构建与运作研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2006(9): 22-27.
[14] 姜曼. 大伙房水库上游地区生态补偿研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2009.
[15] 孟浩, 白杨, 等. 水源地生态补偿研究进展[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2012, 22(10): 86-93.
[16] Pham, T.T., Campbell, B.M. and Garnett, S. (2009) Lessons for Pro-Poor Payments for Environmental Services: An Analysis of Projects in Vietnam. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 31, 117-133.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Pagiola, S., Ramirez, E., Gobbi, J., et al. (2007) Paying for the Environmental Services of Silvopastoral Practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics, 64, 374-385.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Munoz, P.C., Guevara, A., Torres, J.M., et al. (2008) Paying for the Hydrological Services of Mexico’s Forests: Analysis, Negotiations and Results. Ecological Economics, 65, 725-736.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Scullion, J., Thomas, C.W., Vogt, K.A., et al. (2011) Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Payments for Ecosystem Services in Coatepec (Mexico) Using Remote Sensing and On-Site Interviews. Environmental Conservation, 38, 426-434.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Hayes, T.M. (2012) Payment for Ecosystem Services, Sus-tained Behavioural Change, and Adaptive Management: Peasant Perspectives in the Colombian Andes. Environmental Conservation, 39, 144-153.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 徐琳瑜, 杨志峰, 帅磊, 等. 基于生态服务功能价值的水库工程生态补偿研究[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2006, 16(4): 125-128.
[22] 黄一凡, 许开鹏, 王晶晶, 等. 饮用水源地保护经济补偿标准核定方法研究[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2012, 22(11): 93-96.
[23] 陈江龙, 姚佳, 等. 基于发展权价值评估的太湖东部水源保护区生态补偿标准[J]. 湖泊科学, 2012, 24(4): 609-614.
[24] 靳乐山, 左文娟, 李玉新, 赵怡, 张庆丰. 水源地生态补偿标准估算——以贵阳鱼洞峡水库为例[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2012, 22(2): 21-26.
[25] 耿涌, 戚瑞, 张攀. 基于水足迹的流域生态补偿标准模型研究[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2009, 19(6): 11-16.
[26] 邵帅. 基于水足迹模型的水资源补偿策略研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(14): 116-119.
[27] 刘玉龙, 胡鹏. 基于帕累托最优的新安江流域生态补偿标准[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 40(6): 703-707.
[28] 王爱敏, 葛颜祥, 耿翔燕. 水源地保护区生态补偿利益相关者行为选择机理分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2015, 36(5): 16-22.
[29] Fennessy, M.S. and Cronk, J.K. (1997) The Effectiveness and Restoration Potential of Riparian Ecotones for the Management of Nonpoint Source Pollution, Particularly Nitrate. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 285-317.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Scherr, S., White, A. and Khare, A. (2004) Current Status and Future Potential of Markets for Ecosystem Services of Tropical Forests: An Overview. A Report Prepared for the International Tropical Timber Council.
[31] Asquith, N.M., Vargas, M.T. and Wunder, S. (2008) Selling Two Environmental Services: In-Kind Payments for Bird Habitat and Watershed Protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics, 65, 675-684.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] 苏芳, 尚海洋. 生态补偿方式对农户生计策略的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(2): 58-63.
[33] 王青瑶, 马永双. 湿地生态补偿方式探讨[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(3): 27-32.

为你推荐