大学生人际自立与分配行为的关系:人际信任的中介作用
The Relationship between Interpersonal Self-Support and Distribution Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Interpersonal Trust
摘要: 人际自立是指个体自己在与人交往过程中形成的以及在解决人际交往所出现的问题中所形成的人格特征,包括人际独立、人际主动、人际责任、人际灵活、人际开放5个特质人格维度。已有的研究表明人格变量可以预测人们的分配行为。本研究采用基于中国传统文化而建立的人际自立来探讨人际自立特质与分配行为的关系,同时,探讨人际信任在两者关系中所起到的作用与机制。本研究采用大学生人际自立量表、人际信任量表以及分配行为情境问卷对重庆、福建、贵州、云南、四川六所高校的1355名有效被试进行了调查,相关的数据处理结果显示,在控制了年龄、性别后:1) 人际自立的5个特质与分配行为呈负相关;2) 人际自立的5个特质与人际信任呈正相关;3) 人际信任在人际自立的人际主动、人际责任以及人际开放中与分配行为之间的关系中起中介作用。研究结果支持了研究假设,提示人际自立可以通过人际信任的中介作用来预测分配行为。
Abstract: Previous studies have indicated that the personality dimension and distribution behavior, inter-personal self-support can predict the distribution behavior of people. This study further assumes that interpersonal self-reliance can predict the distribution behavior through the mediating role of interpersonal trust. To test this hypothesis, the interpersonal self-support scale, interpersonal trust scale and distribution situation in Chongqing, Fujian, questionnaire of college students in Guizhou, Yunnan, Sichuan six universities and 1355 participants were participated. The correlation analysis, structural equation model results showed that, after controlling for age, gender: 1) interpersonal self-support was negatively related to distribution behavior; 2) The 5 features of interpersonal self-support and interpersonal trust was positively correlated; 3) Interpersonal trust plays a partial mediating role between interpersonal self-support and distribution behavior, the fit indices of the structural equation model are an adequate fit, chi-square = 209.748, df = 99, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.046 (90% CI [0.038, 0.38]), CFI = 0.976, TLI = 0.971, SRMR. = 0.041. The results supported the hypothesis that interpersonal self-support can predict the distribution behavior through the intermediary role of interpersonal trust.
文章引用:王月月 (2018). 大学生人际自立与分配行为的关系:人际信任的中介作用. 心理学进展, 8(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.81003

参考文献

[1] 丛文君(2014). 大学生亲社会行为与人格特质的关系. 江西社会科学, 2, 245-249.
[2] 黄希庭(2004). 再谈人格研究的中国化. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 30(6), 5-9.
[3] 田园(2011a). 研究生人际信任、领悟社会支持与亲社会行为倾向的关系研究. 硕士论文. 杭州: 杭州师范大学.
[4] 王丽(2003). 中小学生亲社会行为与同伴关系、人际信任、社会期望及自尊的关系研究. 硕士论文. 西安: 陕西师范大学.
[5] 夏凌翔, 黄希庭(2008). 青少年学生自立人格量表的建构. 心理学报, 40(5), 593-603.
[6] 杨建峰. (2013b). 大学生母亲教养方式、自立人格与人际信任的关系研究. 硕士论文. 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
[7] 张建齐. (2012b). 90后大学生人际信任、自立人格与人际关系的相关研究. 硕士论文. 福州: 福建师范大学.
[8] Camerer, C. F. (2004). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Cuadernos De Economía, 23, 229-236.
[9] Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2006). When Does “Economic Man” Dominate Social Behavior? Science, 311, 47-52.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Carlo, G., Christ, C., Laible, D., & Gulseven, Z. (2016). An Evolving and Developing Field of Study: Prosocial Morality from a Biological, Cultural, and Developmental Perspective. Springer International Publishing.[CrossRef
[11] Devoe, S. E., & Iyengar, S. S. (2010). Medium of Exchange Matters: What’s Fair for Goods Is Unfair for Money. Psychological Science, 21, 159-162.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367-388.[CrossRef
[13] Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s Watching? Subtle Cues Affect Generosity in an Anonymous Economic Game. Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 245-256.[CrossRef
[14] Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Foundations of Cooperation in Young Children. Cognition, 108, 222-231.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002a). Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422.[CrossRef
[16] Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002b). Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422.[CrossRef
[17] Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Takagishi, H., Shinada, M., Tanida, S., & Cook, K. S. (2009). The Private Rejection of Unfair Offers and Emotional Commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 11520-11523.[CrossRef] [PubMed]