公平理论在亲密关系中的应用研究述评
A Review of Equity Theory Application in Romantic Relationship
摘要: 公平理论认为人们只有觉得自己在关系中既没有多得、也没有少得时，对当前的亲密关系才是最满意的。它不仅适用于经济交换关系，同样适用于包含亲密关系在内的人际关系。本文综述了公平理论在亲密关系中的适用性，以及伴侣间的公平对亲密关系满意度和稳定性的影响。那些认为自己在关系中受到公平对待的个体有较高的关系满意度和关系承诺。本文也总结了国内外亲密关系中的公平理论的研究现状、亲密关系中公平的测量及其影响因素，并展望在未来研究中发展出适合测量中国人对亲密关系中公平感知的测量工具，用以对中国人亲密关系中公平感知情况的了解和亲密关系的指导。
Abstract: Equity theory holds that people are most satisfied with their current romantic relationship, when they think they neither gain more, nor gain less in relationship. It applies not only to economical exchange relationships, but also to personal relationships including romantic relationships. This paper reviews the fitness of equity theory applied in romantic relationships, and the influence of equity between couples on relationship satisfaction and stability. People who feel they are treated equally in relationships, score high in relationship satisfaction and commitment. This paper also reviews the research status in China and abroad about equity theory applied in romantic relationships, and measurement of equity in romantic relationships, as well as effect factors. In further research, we can explore a tool that measures the equity of romantic relationships among Chinese people. So we can get to know the situation of equity in romantic relationship among Chinese people, and afford guidance to their romantic relationship.
文章引用：周灵力, 宋诗情, 郑莹灿 (2018). 公平理论在亲密关系中的应用研究述评. 心理学进展, 8(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.81005

参考文献

[1] 郭辉、肖斌(译) (2005). 亲密关系. 北京: 人民邮电出版. (Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. M., 2001)
[2] 李建鸣 (2008). 爱的艺术. 上海: 上海译文出版社. (Fromn, E., 1956)
[3] 谢晓非、谢冬梅、张怡玲, 等 (2004). 社会心理学. 北京: 北京大学出版社. (Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O., 2000)
[4] Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.[CrossRef] 
[5] Aumer-Ryan, K., Hatfield, E., & Frey, R. (2006). Equity in Romantic Relationships: An Analysis across Self-Construal and Culture. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
[6] Bakker, A. B., Petrou, P., & Tsaousis, I. (2012). Inequity in Work and Intimate Relationships: A Spillover-Crossover Model. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25, 491-506.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Batson, C. D. (1993). Communal and Exchange Relationships: What Is the Difference? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 677-683.[CrossRef] 
[8] Clark, M. S., & Grote, N. K. (1998). Why Aren’t Indices of Relationship Costs Always Negatively Related to Indices of Relationship Quality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 2-17.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A Safe Haven: An Attachment Theory Perspective on Support Seeking and Caregiving in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 1053-1073.[CrossRef] 
[10] Grau, I., & Doll, J. (2003). Effects of Attachment Styles on the Experience of Equity in Heterosexual Couples Relationships. Experimental Psychology, 50, 298.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2011). Equity Theory in Close Relationships. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 2, 200-217.
[12] Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Aumer-Ryan, K. (2008). Social Justice in Love Relationships: Recent Developments. Social Justice Research, 21, 413-431.[CrossRef] 
[13] Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J. A. N. E., & Walster, W. (1979). Equity and Extramarital Sex. In Love and Attraction: An International Conference (pp. 309-321). Oxford: Pergamon.[CrossRef] 
[14] Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Hay, J. (1985). Equity and Intimate Relations: Recent Research. In Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 91-117). New York: Springer.[CrossRef] 
[15] Hatfield, E., Utne, M. K., & Traupmann, J. (1979). Equity Theory and Intimate Relationships. In R. L. Burgess, & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social Exchange in Developing Relationships (pp. 99-133). New York, NY: Academic Press.[CrossRef] 
[16] Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.[CrossRef] 
[17] Hui, H., & Triandis, H. (1990). Multimethod Probes of Individualism and Collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.[CrossRef] 
[18] Kelley, H. H. (1987). Attribution in Social Interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (pp. 1-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[19] Kordoutis, P. S. (2007). Equity Effects on Love-Satisfaction and Emotional Communication of Intimate Relationship Partners. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 14, 27-41.
[20] Mikula, G., Athenstaedt, U., Heschgl, S. et al. (1998). Does It Only Depend on the Point of View? Perspective-Related Differences in Justice Evaluations of Negative Incidents in Personal Relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 931-962.[CrossRef] 
[21] Orehek, E., & Forest, A. (2016). When People Serve as Means to Goals: Implications of a Motivational Account of Close Relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 79-84.[CrossRef] 
[22] Peterson, C. (1981). Equity, Equality and Marriage. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 283-284.[CrossRef] 
[23] Peterson, L. R., & Maynard, J. L. (1981). Income, Equity, and Wives’ Housekeeping Role Expectations: Bringing Home the Bacon Doesn’t Mean I Have to Cook It, Too. Pacific Sociological Review, 24, 87-105.[CrossRef] 
[24] Rosenblatt, P. C., & Cunningham, M. R. (1976). Sex Differences in Cross-Cultural Perspective. In B. B. Lloyd, & J. Archer (Eds.), Exploring Sex Differences (pp. 71-94). New York, NY & London: Academic Press.
[25] Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence Processes. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 564-596). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
[26] Smith, M. J., & Schroeder, D. A. (1984). Concurrent and Construct Validities of Two Measures of Psychological Equity/Inequity. Psychological Reports, 54, 59-68.[CrossRef] 
[27] Traupmann, J., & Hatfield, E. (1983). How Important Is Marital Fairness over the Lifespan. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17, 89-101.[CrossRef] 
[28] Traupmann, J., Petersen, R., Utne, M. et al. (1981). Measuring Equity in Intimate Relations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 467-480.[CrossRef] 
[29] Van Lange, P. A. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). My Relationship Is Better Than and Not as Bad as—Yours Is: The Perception of Superiority in Close Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 32-44.[CrossRef] 
[30] Van Yperen, N. W., & Buunk, B. P. (1990). A Longitudinal Study of Equity and Satisfaction in Intimate Relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 287-309.[CrossRef] 
[31] Van Yperen, N. W., & Buunk, B. P. (1991). Equity Theory and Exchange and Communal Orientation from a Cross-National Perspective. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 5-20.[CrossRef] 
[32] Vanfossen, B. E. (1981). Sex Differences in the Mental Health Effects of Spouse Support and Equity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 130-143.[CrossRef] 
[33] Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New Directions in Equity Research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.[CrossRef]