基于GARCH模型的融资融券对我国股市的影响研究
A Research about Effects Margin Transaction Has on the Stock Market in China Based on GARCH Model
DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2018.81005, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张 涛*, 李凡一, 张苏靖:南京工业大学海外教育学院,江苏 南京;邓晓卫:南京工业大学数理科学学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 融资融券股市波动性GARCH模型虚拟变量Margin Transaction Stock Market Volatility GARCH Model Dummy Variable
摘要: 选取2014年3月12日至2016年9月14日之间的619个上证综指的对数收益率以及上交所的融资、融券余额作为样本数据。首先,利用AIC和SC准则确定了GARCH模型的滞后项数;然后,引入虚拟变量作为牛、熊市的划分,建立含虚拟变量的GARCH(1,1)模型,分析融资融券制度对股市波动性的影响。结果显示:1) 融资交易在熊市和牛市均增加了股市的波动性,并且融资交易在熊市时对股市波动性的放大作用比在牛市时更大;2) 融券交易在牛市时,增加了股市的波动性,而在熊市时,对股市的波动性有抑制作用。最后,结合当时的制度、政策及投资者心理,从统计上分析得到:在我国融资融券业务发展不均衡,融资业务规模远远大于融券业务的规模,因此,我国两融业务对股市波动性最重要的影响是融资业务。
Abstract: Select 619 logarithmic ratio of Shanghai Composite Index and balances of financing and securities loan during the period between 12th March, 2014 and 14th September, 2016 as sample data. Firstly, AIC and SC criteria are used to confirm the lag item numbers of GARCH model. Then, we introduce dummy variables as the partition of bull market and bear market, establish GARCH (1,1) model including dummy variables and analyze the effects that the system of margin transaction has on stock market volatility. The results indicate that: 1) Financing transaction in both bull market and bear market increases stock market volatility and the amplified influence that financing transaction has on the volatility in the bear market is more significant than that in the bull market. 2) Securities trading increases the volatility in the bull market while restrains that in the bear market. Finally, we combine the temporal systems, policies and investors’ mentality and from statistical analysis, we draw a conclusion: In China, financing business and securities business develop unevenly and the scale of financing business is far larger than that of securities business. Thus, in China, financing business exerts more important effects on the fluctuation of the stock market than securities business.
文章引用:张涛, 邓晓卫, 李凡一, 张苏靖. 基于GARCH模型的融资融券对我国股市的影响研究[J]. 金融, 2018, 8(1): 46-55. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2018.81005

参考文献

[1] Lintner, J. (1971) The Effect of Short Selling and Margin Requirements in Perfect Capital Markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 6, 1173-1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Kim, W.H. (1996) Short-Sales Restrictions and Volatility the case of the Stock Exchange of Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 4, 377-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bris, A., Goerzmann, W.N. and Zhu, N. (2007) Efficiency and the Bear: Short Sales and Markets around the World. The Journal of Finance, 62, 1029-1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Sobaci, C., Sensoy, A. and Erturk, M. (2014) Impact of Short Selling Activity on Market Dynamics: Evidence from An Emerging Market. Journal of Financial Stability, 15, 53-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Bohl, M.T., Reher, G. and Wilfling, B. (2016) Short Selling Constraints and Stock Returns Volatility: Empirical Evidence from German Stock Market. Economical Modelling, 58, 159-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 王虎, 朱贵宇. 论融资融券对中国股市波动性的影响[J]. 商业时代, 2012(7): 64-65.
[7] 冯玉梅, 陈璇, 张玲. 融资融券交易对我国股市波动性的影响研究——基于融资融券转常规前后的比较检验[J].山东社会科学, 2015(2): 130-134.
[8] 吴国平, 谷慎. 融资融券交易对我国股市波动性影响的实证研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2015(10): 105-107.
[9] 张兰兰. 论融资融券制度对我国股市波动性的影响——基于VAR模型分析[J]. 时代金融, 2016(6): 138-142.
[10] 倪伟佳. 我国融资融券业务对股票波动性的影响分析——基于TGARCH模型的长期研究[J]. 中国证券期货, 2013(7): 28-30.
[11] 姜近勇, 潘冠中. 金融计量经济学[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2011(7): 119-130.
[12] 胡忆文. 融资融券对我国股市波动性影响的实证研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2017(4): 55-60.