基于主成分分析法去屏蔽的地层尖灭线识别技术及应用——以塔河油田678区不整合面T50屏蔽为例
Application of Seismic Shield Removal of Stratum Pinch-out Line Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA)——A Case Study of Unconformity Surface T50 in Block 678 of Tahe Oilfield
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2018.401004, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 邓 锋, 石 玉, 姜 冬:中石化西北油田分公司勘探开发研究院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 主成分分析地层尖灭线地层圈闭油藏Principal Component Analysis Stratum Pinch-out Line Stratum Trap Reservoir
摘要: 地层尖灭线的识别与刻画对地层尖灭圈闭的描述极为重要。塔河油田石炭系卡拉沙依组地层尖灭线埋深较大,地震反射层能量较弱,分辨率较低,上覆不整合面T50的强反射隐蔽了地层尖灭线的有效反射信号,使地层尖灭位置很难准确判断。利用主成分分析法去不整合面T50的强屏蔽,使尖灭点信息在地震剖面上更加清晰,从而获得地层尖灭线较精确的位置,使沿其发育的一批地层圈闭边界刻画的更加精确,为地层圈闭类油藏储量的准确计算打下坚实基础。
Abstract: The identification and characterization of stratum pinch-out line were very important for stratum pinch-out trap description. The buried depth of stratum pinch-out line in Carboniferous Kalashayi Formation was larger, and its seismic reflection energy was weaker with low resolution. On the top of the Carboniferous Kalashayi Formation, there was an unconformity surface T50 with strong seismic reflection, by which the effective reflection signal of stratum pinch-out line was hidden, so it was very difficult to accurately identify the pinch-out position. In this paper, principal component analysis (PCA) method is used to shield the strong seismic reflection signal of unconformity surface T50; therefore the pinch-out point is more clear, and more precise stratum pinch-out line position is obtained for accurately describing the boundary of stratum traps which develops along the stratum pinch-out line. The method provides a solid foundation for accurately calculating the reservoir reserves of stratum traps.
文章引用:邓锋, 石玉, 姜冬. 基于主成分分析法去屏蔽的地层尖灭线识别技术及应用——以塔河油田678区不整合面T50屏蔽为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2018, 40(1): 24-29. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2018.401004

参考文献

[1] Hower, P.W. (2001) Principal Components Analysis of Protein Structure Ensembles Calculated Using NMR Data. Journal of Biomolecular NMR, 20, 61-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Ouyang, Y. (2005) Evaluation of River Water Quality Monitoring Stations by Principal Component Analysis. Water Research, 39, 2621-2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 陈扬, 张太宁, 郭澎, 等. 基于主成分分析的复杂光谱定量分析方法的研究[J]. 光学学报, 2009, 29(5): 1285-1291.
[4] 骆行文, 姚海林. 基于主成分分析的岩石质量综合评价模型与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31( S2): 452-455.
[5] 张国英, 王娜娜, 张润生, 等. 基于主成分分析的BP神经网络在岩性识别中的应用[J]. 北京石油化工学院学报, 2008, 16(3): 43-46.
[6] 彭仕宓, 熊琦华, 王才经, 等. 储层综合评价的主成分分析方法[J]. 石油学报, 1994, 15( S1): 187-194.
[7] 张莹, 潘保芝. 基于主成分分析的SOM神经网络在火山岩岩性识别中的应用[J]. 测井技术, 2009, 33(6): 550-554.
[8] 熊冉, 赵继龙, 刘少治, 等. 草南地区东河砂岩尖灭线地震识别与预测[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2010, 7(4): 57-60.
[9] 王军, 张中巧, 滕玉波, 等. 基于地震瞬时谱分析的三角洲砂体尖灭线识别技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2011, 18(5): 585-588.
[10] 王志杰. 东营凹陷小营油田沙二段砂体尖灭线地震描述技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2012, 47(2): 305-309.
[11] 王军, 周东红, 张中巧, 等. 低位楔形三角洲砂体岩性尖灭线地震响应特征探索[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2010, 24(5): 33-37.
[12] Buckley, P.J. (1988) Measures of International Competitiveness: A Critical Survey. Journal of Marketing Management, 4, 175-200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 康永尚, 沈金松, 谌卓恒. 现代数学地质[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2005: 67-71.
[14] 杨永国. 数学地质[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2010: 110-113.