训练图像对多点地质统计反演效果的影响
The Influence of Training Images on the Effect of Multipoint Geostatistical Inversion
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2018.81005, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 赵学思:页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室,北京;长江大学地球科学学院,湖北 蔡甸;尹艳树*, 王立鑫:长江大学地球科学学院,湖北 蔡甸
关键词: 多点地质统计学训练图像地震反演影响Multipoint Geostatistics Training Image Seismic Inversion Influence
摘要: 油气储层建模已经由两点统计发展为多点统计建模。相应的,基于多点地质统计学的储层反演方法也得到了开发。由于训练图像对建模有重要影响。本文以多点地质统计反演中关键输入参数训练图像为对象,探讨其对反演结果的影响。通过设计三种不同类型的训练图像,即与实际储层一致的训练图像;与实际储层结构一致但储层分布位置存在差异的训练图像;将实际储层旋转90度的训练图像。开展多点反演并比较其反演效果。结果表明,训练图像越准确,多点地质统计反演结果收敛速度快,反演误差小;而训练图像越不符合实际,则模拟收敛慢,耗时长,模拟误差大。训练图像结构符合实际情况时,其分布位置差异对反演结果影响不大。
Abstract: The stochastic modeling is developed from two point geostatistics to multi-point geostatistics, and a seismic inversion method based on multi-point geostatistics is proposed. Since the training image is the key of multi-point geostatistical modeling, it directly determines the quality of the modeling results. An evaluation of training image in inversion is necessary. Three different training image is designed to reveal the influence on inversion result, that is, a training image same to the real reservoir, a training image reflecting the structure of the real reservoir, and a rotation of 90 degree which is different to the real reservoir. The results show that the training image has a great influence on the convergence speed of the multi-point geostatistical inversion, and the more ac-curate the training image is, the faster convergence speed of the multi-point geostatistical inversion is. The place of the lithofacies has little influence unless they have different structure.
文章引用:赵学思, 尹艳树, 王立鑫. 训练图像对多点地质统计反演效果的影响[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2018, 8(1): 42-47. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2018.81005

参考文献

[1] 吴胜和, 李文克. 多点地质统计学——理论/应用与展望.古地理学报[J]. 2005, 7(1).
[2] González, F., Mukerji, T. and Mavko, G. (2008) Seismic Inversion Combining Rockphysics and Multiple-Point Geostatistics. Geophysics, 73, 11-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Zhou, H. and Gomez-Hernandez, J. (2012) A Pattern-Search-Based Inverse Method. Water Resources Research, 48.
[4] Zhang, T.f., Switzer, P., Journel, A., et al. (2006) Filter-Based Classification of Training Image Patterns for Spatial Simulation. Mathematical Geology, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Larsen, A., Ulv-moen, M., Omre, H., et al. (2006) Bayesian Lithology/Fluid Prediction and Simulation on the Basis of a Markov-chain Prior Model. Geophysics, 71, 69-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Tarantola, A. (2005) Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Nunes, R., Soares, A., Azevedo, L., et al. (2017) Geostatistical Seismic Inversion with Direct Sequential Simulation and Co-simulation with Multi-local Distribution Functions. Mathematical Geosciences, 49, 583-601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 杨培杰. 地质统计学反演——从两点到多点[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(5): 2293-2300.