基于大学生字词联想的“师道”文化内隐观探析——民间概念研究之十三
Folk-Conceptual Research (XIII): Implicit Theories of “Shi Dao” Based on Word Associations by College Students
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.82028, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 谢 伟, 李朝旭, 刘伟彪, 张立昕:曲阜师范大学心理学系,山东 曲阜;王晓娜:武汉大学马克思主义学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 师道概念表征激活扩散模型聚类分析Shi Shi Dao Conceptual Representation Spreading-Activation Theory Cluster Analysis
摘要: 本研究以儒家文化下的“师”概念为出发点,依据激活扩散模型,对不同的“师”的相关概念的差异进行初探,从而为探索新的师生关系道路提供新的视角。以“老师”、“导师”、“教师”和“指导教师”为靶词,激活288名被试对“师”的心理表征,之后共收集到4239个联想词,其中高频词有2326个,最终选出94个高频数的相关概念词。通过聚类分析和差异性检验后,结果表明:德才兼备方为“师”,“师道”之重心在为师之道,主要表现在“师范”和“学识魅力”维度上。本科生导师胜任力的要素有:德才兼备为核心;导师自身的科研能力和适当满足学生对常规教学的需求为两翼;建立良性的有情感、有温度的师生关系为保障。
Abstract: The research was based on the core concept “Shi” which is under the context of Confucian culture. According to the spreading-activation theory, the related concepts of different “Shi” were preliminary discussed, which provided a new perspective to explore new relationship between teachers and students. The “teacher” “mentor” “instructor” and “supervisor” were taken as the target words which represented the different “Shi” and activated the mental conceptual representation of 288 participants. Then a total of 4239 association words were collected which included 2326 high frequent words in them. Finally, we selected top 94 high frequent association words, which were relevant to “Shi”. After running cluster analysis in the mass and chi-square difference test among 4 different targets, the results show that to be “Shi” requires both virtue and ability. The core of “Shi Dao” is to be an excellent tutor, mainly embodied in the dimensions of fine example of normativeness and showing the scholarly charm for students. Totally, the competency factors of the undergraduate mentors are that virtue and ability of “shi” are the core elements; having high level abilities of research and satisfying the students’ need of routine instruction appropriately are just like two wings of one bird in the area of teaching; establishing the benign, emotional and warm relationship with students is the guarantee of tutors’ competence in the mind of students.
文章引用:谢伟, 李朝旭, 刘伟彪, 张立昕, 王晓娜 (2018). 基于大学生字词联想的“师道”文化内隐观探析——民间概念研究之十三. 心理学进展, 8(2), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.82028

参考文献

[1] 陈桂生(2008). 师道辨析. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 53(5), 86-87.
[2] 陈振中(2000). 重新审视师生冲突——一种社会学分析. 教育评论, (2), 40-42.
[3] 葛鲁嘉(1994). 中国本土的传统形态心理学与本土化的科学形态心理学. 社会科学战线, (2), 68-73, 137.
[4] 金盛华(2015). 幸福的社会心理实质与自我价值定向机制. 黑龙江社会科学, 150(3), 87-92.
[5] 李朝旭, 李松清, 董洪杰, 潘文静(2015). 当代青年群体“成功”的内隐结构初探——民间概念研究之十. 社会心理研究, 103(3), 62-71.
[6] 李方安, 陈向明(2016). 大学教师对“好老师”之理解的实践推理——一项扎根理论研究的过程及其反思. 教育学报, 12(2), 58-70.
[7] 李广明(1999). “老师”、“导师”之类的称谓最早见于何书?——试论佛文化对近代汉语词汇的影响. 甘肃高师学报, 4(3), 26-30.
[8] 刘良华(2008). 教育自传中的个人知识:关于“好教师”的调查研究. 北京大学教育评论, 21(1), 125-131, 191.
[9] 刘阳, 李朝旭, 刘晓琳, 高彬雪, 民间文化心理学研究小组(2009). “震时老师先逃跑引争议”——探究互联网折射的民间心态. 社会心理研究, 77(1), 15-26.
[10] 鲁铱, 李晔(2014). 研究生对导师负面评价的恐惧与师徒文化内隐观的关系. 心理科学, 37(6), 1415-1420.
[11] 南旭光(2017). 供给侧改革下我国高等教育的现实矛盾和发展对策. 教育评论, 216(6), 3-7.
[12] 戚万学(2014). 论教师的哲学. 教育研究, 35(12), 85-93.
[13] 容中逵(2007). “道之所存, 师之所存”——关于中国传统“师道”的几点思考. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 43(1), 81-89.
[14] 施书宇, 孙道功(2017). “老师”与“教师”的“词汇语义-题元框架”差异比较及原因剖析. 南京师范大学文学院学报, 86(2), 178-183.
[15] 孙四周(2011). 放下“尊严”与重塑“师道”. 中国教育学刊, 218(6), 80-82.
[16] 田正平, 章小谦(2007). “老师”称谓源流考. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 37(3), 61-67.
[17] 萧承慎(2000). 师道征故. 台北: 师大书苑有限公司.
[18] 杨道宇, 米潇(2013). 教师专业发展的动力机制研究. 教育评论, (6), 45-47.
[19] 张剑, 张建兵, 李跃, Deci, E. L. (2010). 促进工作动机的有效路径: 自我决定理论的观点. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 752-759.
[20] 张立昕, 王炜, 孟乐, 谢伟, 李朝旭(2017). “天”与“上帝”的字词联想表征比较——民间概念研究之十二. 社会心理研究, 109(1), 14-27.
[21] 张林川(2010). 中华成语全典(页954). 武汉: 崇文书局.
[22] 郑雪, 王磊(2005). 中国留学生的文化认同、社会取向与主观幸福感. 心理发展与教育, 21(1), 48-54.
[23] Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing. Readings in Cognitive Science, 82, 407-428.[CrossRef
[24] Liu, S., Keeley, J., & Buskist, W. (2016). Chinese College Students’ Perceptions of Excellent Teachers across Three Disciplines: Psychology, Chemical Engineering, and Education. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 70-74.[CrossRef
[25] Meng, L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2015). Chinese Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Mixed Analysis. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 27, 330-339.