三大产业对通货膨胀的非对称性作用及实证分析
The Asymmetric Effect of Three Industries on Inflation and Empirical Analysis
DOI: 10.12677/WER.2018.71001, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 李清明:云南财经大学统计与数学学院,云南 昆明;中国农业银行昆明市分行,云南 昆明;谭燕珍, 陈虹静, 张雪花:云南财经大学统计与数学学院,云南 昆明;贺军州*:云南财经大学统计与数学学院,云南 昆明;西北工业大学生态与环境保护中心,陕西 西安
关键词: 通货膨胀货币政策模型多生产部门非对称性作用Inflation Monetary Policy Model Multi-Production Department Asymmetric Effect
摘要: 本文将理论模型与调查数据相结合,探讨了不同发展阶段经济体中不同产业对各自经济体通货膨胀的影响。首先建立多生产部门货币政策模型并结合统计数据估计模型参数,然后对随后年份的通货膨胀率进行预测,同时将之与单一生产部门货币政策模型预测的通货膨胀率进行比较。分析显示相较于单生产部门货币政策模而言多生产部门货币政策模型预测值总体更为准确有效。同时根据多生产部门货币政策模型研究发现,第一产业占比较高的经济体其第一产业对其通货膨胀的贡献为负,二、三产业贡献总体为正;第一产业占比较低且第二、三产业占比较高的经济体其第三产业对其通货膨胀的贡献为负,一、二产业的贡献总体为正;而对几乎所有的经济体来说第二产业对通货膨胀的贡献都为正。即不同发展阶段经济体的不同产业对通货膨胀的敏感性具有非对称性的作用,这一结论为不同经济体的政府制定较为合理的货币和产业政策提供了一定理论启示,也为不同发展阶段经济体更有效控制通货膨胀提供了方向和着力点。
Abstract: This paper examines the inflation of industrial structure based on theoretical models with survey data for different economic entities. Firstly, we establish the monetary policy model of multi-production department and estimate the model parameters based on the statistical data. Then the inflation rate of the following years is predicted by the model, and is compared with the inflation rate of the single production department. The analysis shows that the forecast value of the monetary policy model of the multi-production sectors is more accurate and effective than the model of single-production department. Meanwhile, it is found that the primary industries and secondary/tertiary industries have negative and positive contribution to inflation in the economic entities with the higher proportion of primary industry, respectively. On the contrary, the tertiary industries and primary/secondary industries have negative and positive contribution to inflation in the economic entities with the higher proportion of secondary and tertiary industry, respectively. While the contributions of the secondary industry to inflation for almost economies are positive. We find that the feature of inflation possesses asymmetric effect for the three industries, and the influence form is different for economic entities with different industrial structure. This result provides some theoretical enlightenment to adjust and control inflation for government.
文章引用:李清明, 谭燕珍, 陈虹静, 张雪花, 贺军州. 三大产业对通货膨胀的非对称性作用及实证分析[J]. 世界经济探索, 2018, 7(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.12677/WER.2018.71001

参考文献

[1] 徐亚平. 通货膨胀预期形成的模型刻画及其货币政策的关联性[J]. 金融研究, 2010, 363(9): 19-33.
[2] 潘敏, 缪海斌. 产业结构调整与中国通货膨胀缺口持久性[J]. 金融研究, 2012, 381(3): 14-28.
[3] 杨达. 中国货币政策的产业非对称效应[J]. 东北大学学报, 2011, 13(5): 398-403.
[4] Ganley, J. and Chris, S. (1997) The Industrial Impact of Monetary Policy Shocks: Some Styled Facts. Bank of England, London.
[5] 张维迎. 博弈论与信息经济学[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2004.
[6] Hayo, B. and Uhlenbrok, B. (1999) Industry Effects of Monetary Policy in Germany. University of Marburg, Marburg.
[7] 戴金平, 金永军, 陈柳钦. 货币政策的产业效应分析——基于中国货币政策的实证研究[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2005, 7(4): 8-15.
[8] 闫红波, 王国林. 我国货币政策产业效应的非对称性研究——来自制造业的实证[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008, 25(5): 17-29.
[9] Atanasova, C. (2003) Credit Market Imperfections and Business Cycle Dynamics: A Nonlinear Approach. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 7, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Mishkin, F.S. (2007) Inflation Dynamics. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 13147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef