反应抑制中停止加工和反应加工共享加工资源
The Stop and Go Processes Share Processing Capacity in Response Inhibition
摘要: 结合大小Stroop任务和停止信号任务范式,探讨停止加工和反应加工是否共享加工资源。选取31名在校大学生为被试,通过大小Stroop任务操作反应加工所占用的加工资源,进而研究停止信号反应时是否受到反应加工的影响。结果发现在停止信号任务中,当反应加工存在冲突干扰时,停止信号反应时显著增加。表明停止加工受到反应加工所占用资源大小的影响,停止加工和反应加工共享着加工资源。
Abstract: To explore whether stop and go processes share processing capacity, we combined stop-signal task paradigm and large-small Stroop task in the same experiment. We conducted experiments in which 31 university students each performed large-small Stroop task, to vary the load on capacity in the go task. And then to explore whether stop-signal reaction time is affected by the go processes. The results show that stop-signal reaction time significantly increase as the go processes have conflict interference in stop-signal task. Suggesting that the stop processes are affected by the go processes, and stop processes shares processing capacity with the go processes.
文章引用:牟博川, 杨正宇 (2018). 反应抑制中停止加工和反应加工共享加工资源. 心理学进展, 8(3), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.83050

参考文献

[1] Aron, A. R., Behrens, T. E., Smith, S., Frank, M. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3743-3752.[CrossRef
[2] Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2004). Selection, Integration, and Conflict Monitoring: Assessing the Nature and Generality of Prefrontal Cognitive Control Mechanisms. Neuron, 41, 473-487.[CrossRef
[3] Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013). Inhibition and Impulsivity: Behavioral and Neural Basis of Response Control. Progress in Neurobiology, 108, 44-79.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Balancing Cognitive Demands: Control Adjustments in the Stop-Signal Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 392. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3064521/pdf/nihms251459.pdf[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict Monitoring and Cognitive Control. Psychological Review, 108, 624.[CrossRef
[6] Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Inhibitory Control in Mind and Brain: An Interactive Race Model of Countermanding Saccades. Psychological Review, 114, 376.[CrossRef
[7] Brown, J. W., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex. Science, 307, 1118-1121.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Carter, C. S., & Van Veen, V. (2007). Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Conflict Detection: An Update of Theory and Data. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 367-379.[CrossRef
[9] Cavina-Pratesi, C., Bricolo, E., Prior, M., & Marzi, C. A. (2001). Re-dundancy Gain in the Stop-Signal Paradigm: Implications for the Locus of Coactivation in Simple Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 932.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Chamberlain, S. R., Fineberg, N. A., Blackwell, A. D., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2006). Motor Inhibition and Cognitive Flexibility in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Trichotillomania. The American journal of psychiatry, 163, 1282-1284.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Enticott, P. G., Ogloff, J. R., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2008). Response Inhibition and Impulsivity in Schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 157, 251-254.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Forstmann, B. U., Keuken, M. C., Jahfari, S., Bazin, P.-L., Neumann, J., Schäfer, A., Turner, R. et al. (2012). Cortico-Subthalamic White Matter Tract Strength Predicts Interindividual Efficacy in Stopping a Motor Response. Neuroimage, 60, 370-375.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Cools, A. R., & Srivastava, K. (1996). The Prefrontal Landscape: Implications of Functional Architecture for Understanding Human Mentation and the Central Executive. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 351, 1445-1453. http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/351/1346/1445.long[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Grégoire, L., Perruchet, P., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2013). The Musical Stroop Effect: Opening a New Avenue to Research on Automatisms. Experimental Psychology, 60, 269. http://psycontent.metapress.com/content/122w8661j0718187/?genre=article&id=doi%3a10.1027%2f1618-3169%2fa000197[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Grégoire, L., Perruchet, P., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2014). About the Unidirectionality of Interference: Insight from the Musical Stroop Effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2071-2089. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470218.2014.896932?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed&[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hart, H., Radua, J., Nakao, T., Mataix-Cols, D., & Rubia, K. (2013). Meta-Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies of Inhibition and Attention in Atten-tion-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Exploring Task-Specific, Stimulant Medication, and Age Effects. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 185-198. http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/PSYCH/926347/yma120003_185_198.pdf[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Horstmann, G. (2003). The Psychological Refractory Period of Stopping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 965-981. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/29/5/965/[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the Automaticity of Reading: Dilution of Stroop Effects by Color-Irrelevant Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.[CrossRef
[19] Kalanthroff, E., Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2013). Evidence for Interaction between the Stop Signal and the Stroop Task Conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 579-592.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kim, C., Kroger, J. K., & Kim, J. (2011). A Functional Dissociation of Conflict Processing within Anterior Cingulate Cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 304-312. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.21020/abstract[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] King, A. V., Linke, J., Gass, A., Hennerici, M. G., Tost, H., Poupon, C., & Wessa, M. (2012). Microstructure of a Three-Way Anatomical Network Predicts Individual Differences in Response Inhibition: A Tractography Study. Neuroimage, 59, 1949-1959.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Kouneiher, F., Charron, S., & Koechlin, E. (2009). Motivation and Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 939-945.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Laird, A. R., McMillan, K. M., Lancaster, J. L., Kochunov, P., Turkeltaub, P. E., Pardo, J. V., & Fox, P. T. (2005). A Comparison of Label-Based Review and ALE Meta-Analysis in the Stroop Task. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 6-21.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Leite, F. P., & Ratcliff, R. (2010). Modeling Reaction Time and Accuracy of Multiple-Alternative Decisions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 246-273.[CrossRef
[26] Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and Independence in Responding to Double Stimulation: A Comparison of Stop, Change, and Dual-Task Paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.[CrossRef
[27] Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: A Theory of an Act of Control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.[CrossRef
[28] Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. (2011). Hierarchical Control of Cognitive Processes: The Case for Skilled Typewriting. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 1-27). Burlington, NJ: Academic Press.[CrossRef
[29] Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control. Psychological Science, 8, 60-64.[CrossRef
[30] Logan, G. D., Van Zandt, T., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: General and Special Theories of an Act of Control. Psychological Review, 121, 66-95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Logan, G. D., Yamaguchi, M., Schall, J. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2015). Inhibitory Control in Mind and Brain 2.0: Blocked-Input Models of Saccadic Countermanding. Psychological Review, 122, 115-147. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/rev/122/2/115/[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/109/2/163/[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional Interference in the Stroop Effect: Uncovering the Cognitive and Neural Anatomy of Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 383-391.[CrossRef
[34] Mansouri, F. A., Tanaka, K., & Buckley, M. J. (2009). Conflict-Induced Behavioural Adjustment: A Clue to the Executive Functions of the Prefrontal Cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 141-152.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. (1993). Selective Attention to Stroop Dimensions: Effects of Baseline Discriminability, Response Mode, and Practice. Memory & Cognition, 21, 627-645.[CrossRef
[36] Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A Computational Theory of Executive Cognitive Processes and Multiple-Task Performance: Part I. Basic Mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/rev/104/1/3/[CrossRef
[37] Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Van Den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological Correlates of Anterior Cingulate Function in a Go/No-Go Task: Effects of Response Conflict and Trial Type Frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26.[CrossRef
[38] Pontifex, M. B., Saliba, B. J., Raine, L. B., Picchietti, D. L., & Hillman, C. H. (2013). Exercise Improves Behavioral, Neurocognitive, and Scholastic Performance in Children with Atten-tion-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. The Journal of Pediatrics, 162, 543-551. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556380/pdf/nihms404992.pdf[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (1999). Inhibitory After-Effects in the Stop Signal Paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 509-518.[CrossRef
[40] Salinas, E., & Stanford, T. R. (2013). The Countermanding Task Revisited: Fast Stimulus Detection Is a Key Determinant of Psychophysical Performance. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 5668-5685. http://www.jneurosci.org/content/33/13/5668.full.pdf[CrossRef
[41] Schel, M. A., Scheres, A., & Crone, E. A. (2014). New Perspectives on Self-Control Development: Highlighting the Role of Intentional Inhibition. Neuropsychologia, 65, 236-246. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393214002851[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Schneider, D. W., & Anderson, J. R. (2011). A Memory-Based Model of Hick’s Law. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 193-222. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031137/pdf/nihms254224.pdf[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Swick, D., Ashley, V., & Turken, U. (2011). Are the Neural Correlates of Stopping and Not Going Identical? Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Two Response Inhibition Tasks. Neuroimage, 56, 1655-1665. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811911002473[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes. CUP Archive.
[45] Van Boxtel, G. J., van der Molen, M. W., & Jennings, J. R. (2005). Differential Involvement of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Performance Monitoring during a Stop-Signal Task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 1-10.[CrossRef
[46] Van Maanen, L., van Rijn, H., & Borst, J. P. (2009). Stroop and Picture—Word Interference Are Two Sides of the Same Coin. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 987-999.[CrossRef
[47] Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2004). The Interaction between Stop Signal Inhibition and Distractor Interference in the Flanker and Stroop Task. Acta Psychologica, 116, 21-37.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. A. (2008). STOP-IT: Windows Executable Software for the Stop-Signal Paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 479-483.[CrossRef
[49] Yamaguchi, M., Logan, G. D., & Bissett, P. G. (2012). Stopping While Going! Response Inhibition Does Not Suffer Dual-Task Interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 123-134. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/38/1/123/[CrossRef] [PubMed]