不同锚特征和呈现时间对锚定效应的影响
A Research at Anchoring Effects: Anchor Characteristics and Presentation Time
摘要: 本实验以锚值高低、不同锚特征、锚值呈现时间为自变量，以60名被试对锚定问题的反应时和估计值为因变量，采用2 × 2 × 2重复两因素的三因素混合设计，探讨不同锚特征和呈现时间对锚定效应的影响。结果发现，不同锚特征的主效应显著，被试对阿拉伯数字锚的反应时显著短于中文数字锚的反应时；呈现时间的主效应不显著；锚值和锚特征之间存在交互作用。通过进一步研究发现，在锚值高低的两个水平上，锚特征的简单效应均显著。当呈现高锚值时，阿拉伯数字锚的估计值比中文数字锚的估计值更高；当呈现低锚值的时候，阿拉伯数字锚的估计值比中文数字锚的估计值更低。同时，在阿拉伯数字锚和中文数字锚两个不同的锚特征水平上，锚值高低的简单效应也均显著。
Abstract: The research is conducted to figure out the associations between anchor characteristics and presentation time to anchoring effects. The independent variables are anchor values, anchor characteristics and presentation time. The dependent variables are reaction time and estimate values. The results showed that the main effect of anchor characteristics is significant; the reaction time of Arabic number values is faster than that of Chinese number values; the main effect of presentation time is not significant; there is an interaction between anchor values and anchor characteristics. Further study found that under the two levels of anchor values, the simple effect of anchor characteristics is significant. When subjects are faced with high anchor values, the estimate values of Arabic number values are higher than Chinese number values; when subjects are faced with low anchor values, the estimate values of Arabic number values are lower than Chinese number values. At the same time, under the two levels of anchor characteristics, the simple effect of anchor values is also significant.
文章引用：陈思远 (2018). 不同锚特征和呈现时间对锚定效应的影响. 心理学进展, 8(4), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.84056

参考文献

[1] 李斌, 徐富明, 王伟, 邓子鹃, 张军伟(2010). 锚定效应的种类, 影响因素及干预措施. 心理科学进展, 18(1), 34-45.
[2] 李斌, 徐富明, 王伟, 龚梦园(2008). 锚定效应的研究范式、理论模型及应用启示. 应用心理学, 14(3), 269-275.
[3] 李斌, 徐富明, 张军伟, 刘腾飞, 蒋多, 邓子鹃(2010). 内在锚与外在锚对锚定效应及其双加工机制的影响. 心理科学, 35(1), 171-176.
[4] 刘青(2011). 锚值分类及锚定效应的心理机制. 心理学研究, (3), 116-117.
[5] 曲琛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉(2008). 锚定判断中的心理刻度效应: 来自ERP证据. 心理学报, 40(60), 681-692.
[6] 王晓庄(2013). 调整与通达: 锚定效应心理机制的研究进展. 心理与行为研究, 11(2), 270-275.
[7] 王晓庄, 白学军(2009). 判断决策中的锚定效应. 心理科学进展, 17(1), 37-43.
[8] 肖刘威(2008). 基本锚定效应影响因素的研究. 硕士论文, 南昌: 江西师范大学.
[9] 余海丹(2009). 阈下非数值锚的实验研究. 硕士论文, 宁波: 宁波大学.
[10] Brewer, N. T., & Chapman, G. B. (2002). The Fragile Basic Anchoring Effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 65-77.[CrossRef] 
[11] Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When Effortful Thinking Influences Judgmental Anchoring: Differential Effects of Forewarning and Incentives on Self-Generated and Externally Provided Anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199-212.[CrossRef] 
[12] Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Why Adjustments Are Insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311-318.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2010). Anchoring Unbound. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 20-24.[CrossRef] 
[14] Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161-1166.[CrossRef] 
[15] Malladi, S., & Min, K. J. (2005). Decision Support Models for the Selection of Internet Access Technologies in Rural Communities. Telematics & Informatics, 22, 201-219.[CrossRef] 
[16] Mussweiler, T., & Englich, B. (2005). Subliminal Anchoring: Judgmental Consequences and Underlying Mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 133-143.[CrossRef] 
[17] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 387-402.[CrossRef]