物质资本与个体真实性的关系：主观社会经济地位的作用
The Relationships between Material Capital and Authenticity: The Role of Subjective Socioeconomic Status
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.84075, PDF,   
作者: 韩 悦：郑州大学教育学院，河南 郑州；赵梦娇：中兵通信科技股份有限公司人力资源部，河南 新乡
关键词: 物质资本；主观社会经济地位；个体真实性；Material Capital； Subjective Socioeconomic Status； Authenticity
摘要: 目的：研究主观社会经济地位在物质资本和个体真实性之间的中介作用。方法：在郑州市选取185名被试，分别使用MacArthur主观社会地位量表、物质资本量表、个体真实性量表对其主观社会经济地位、物质资本以及个体真实性进行测量。结果：物质资本对个体真实性具有正向预测作用；主观社会经济地位对个体真实性具有正向预测作用；在控制主观社会经济地位对个体真实性影响的基础上，物质资本仍能正向预测个体真实性(β值从0.218下降到0.161)。结论：主观社会经济地位在物质资本和个体真实性之间发挥着部分中介作用。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the mediating effect of subjective socioeconomic status on relationships between material capital and authenticity. Methods: Totally 185 individuals were selected. And they are respectively surveyed with the Material Capital Scale, the Subjective Socioeconomic Status Questionnaire and the Authenticity Scale. Results: Regression analysis indicated positive predictability of material capital to authenticity and positive predictability of subjective socioeconomic status to authenticity. Material capital still had significant positively predictability to authenticity (β value decreased from 0.218 to 0.161) on the basis that subjective socioeconomic status was controlled. Conclusion: The result of the research indicates that subjective socioeconomic status has a partial mediating effect between material capital and authenticity.
文章引用：韩悦, 赵梦娇 (2018). 物质资本与个体真实性的关系：主观社会经济地位的作用. 心理学进展, 8(4), 636-641. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.84075

参考文献

[1] 曹中平, 黄月胜( 2006). 大学生弱势群体自我认知研究. 高等教育与学术研究, (3), 40-45.
[2] 曾细花(2011). 真实性在个体心理健康中的作用. 医学与哲学: 人文社会医学版, 32(8), 27-29.
[3] 曾细花(2012). 高中生真实性的特点研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(5), 761-763.
[4] 陈瑞, 郑毓煌, 刘文静(2013). 中介效应分析: 原理、程序、Bootstrap方法及其应用. 营销科学学报, 9(4), 120-135.
[5] 陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均(2014). 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊: 主观社会地位的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 6(5), 594-604.
[6] 施展望(2008). 家庭社会经济困难大学生的自我意识解析与完善. 高校教育研究, (4), 10-20.
[7] 陶塑, 何瑾, 杨经纶, 刘海燕(2012). 依恋安全、真实性对大学生诚信价值观的影响. 中国特殊教育, 145(7), 92-96.
[8] 张文新, 王美萍, Fuligni, A. (2006). 青少年的自主期望、对父母权威的态度与亲子冲突和亲合. 心理学报, 38(6), 868-876.
[9] Bradley, R., & Corwyn, R. (2002). Socioeconomic Status and Child Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Franzese, A. T. (2007). To Thine Own Self Be True an Exploration of Authenticity. Durham, NC: Duke University.
[11] Goodman, E., & Adler, N. E. (2003). Impact of Objective and Subjective Social Status on Obesity in a Biracial Cohort of Adolescents. Obesity Research, 11, 1018-1026.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Greitemeyer, T., & Sagioglou, C. (2016). Subjective Socioeconomic Status Causes Aggression: A Test of the Theory of Social Deprivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 178-194.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Griskevicius, V., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2011). Environmental Contingency in Life History Strategies: The Influence of Mortality and Socioeconomic Status on Reproductive Timing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 241-254.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2005). From Thought and Experience to Behavior and Interpersonal Relationships: A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), On Building, Defending and Regulating the Self: A Psychological Perspective (pp. 31-52). New York: Psychology Press.
[15] Wilkinson, R. G. (1999). Health, Hierarchy, and Social Anxiety. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896, 48-63.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The Authentic Personality: A Theoretical and Empirical Conceptualization and the Development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 385-389.