珠三角深厚软土层公路隧道深基坑围护结构变形分析
Supporting Parameter Sensitivity Analysis on Deep Foundation Pit of Highway Tunnel in the Pearl River Delta
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2018.73041, PDF,   
作者: 庞文喻:中铁珠三角投资发展有限公司,广东 广州;王 晨:绍兴文理学院土木工程学院,浙江 绍兴;吴春勇:南京瑞迪建设科技有限公司,江苏 南京
关键词: 公路隧道深基坑软土支护参数敏感性分析Highway Tunnel Deep Foundation Pit Soft Soil Supporting Parameter Sensitivity Analysis
摘要: 在以“围护桩 + 内支撑”支护方案下的软土深基坑中,围护结构参数的取值直接关系到支护的安全稳定性和经济合理性。本文以珠三角公路隧道深基坑工程为背景,采用非线性有限元分析软件MIDAS/GTS对该深基坑围护结构施工过程进行数值模拟,并将计算结果与监测结果进行对比分析。采用建立的计算模型,按单因素分析方法对深基坑围护结构变形的影响因素进行分析。结果表明:当桩径和支撑刚度增大时,围护结构的水平位移显著减小,从经济性考虑,二者存在一个最优值,当桩径达到1.1 m、支撑刚度达到2倍原设计值时,继续增大2类参数效果不再明显;围护桩嵌固深度主要影响墙体底部位移,围护桩的入土深度以嵌入基岩为上限,以保证不发生“踢脚”破坏为下限。
Abstract: The value of retaining structure parameter is directly related to the supporting security and eco-nomic rationality of deep foundation pit supported by “retaining pile + support within” in soft soil. This paper used analysis software MIDAS/GTS to simulate numerically retaining structure of deep foundation construction process by taking a foundation pit excavation in the section of highway tunnel as object. Meanwhile, analysis was made from its results compared with monitoring data. The influence factor of retaining structure of deep foundation excavation deformation was analyzed by single factor analysis using established calculation model. The results show that, the wall displacement was obvious affected by two parameters of the pile diameter and bracing stiffness, which existed an optimal value from economic considerations. When the pile diameter reached 1.2 m and support stiffness reached 2 times of the original design value, displacement constraints effect will be no longer obvious to continually increase these two types of parameters value. Depth of retaining pile mainly affects the displacement of bottom wall, and the upper limit depth is to make the wall embedded in bedrock, and the lower limit depth is to avoid the “skirting” damage.
文章引用:庞文喻, 王晨, 吴春勇. 珠三角深厚软土层公路隧道深基坑围护结构变形分析[J]. 土木工程, 2018, 7(3): 358-366. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2018.73041

参考文献

[1] 杨岳华, 刘永健, 邓淑飞, 等. 沉降控制的单桩竖向承载力及其数值分析方法[J]. 公路工程, 2008(4): 133-136.
[2] 杨光华. 深基坑支护结构的实用计算方法及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(12): 188-193.
[3] 师庭飞, 陈颖辉. 排桩支护结构反力计算方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2012, 12(12): 300-304.
[4] 郭子源. 深部高应力软岩巷道开挖与支护围岩变形的FLAC 3D模拟[J]. 矿冶工程, 2012(2): 180-185.
[5] 刘国彬, 王卫东. 基坑工程手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
[6] 温锁林. 近距离上穿运营地铁隧道的基坑明挖施工控制技术[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(增刊2): 451-454.
[7] 史春乐, 王鹏飞, 王小军, 等. 深基坑开挖导致邻近建筑群大变形损坏的实测分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(增刊): 512-518.
[8] 徐中华, 王卫东, 王建华. 逆作法深基坑对周边保护建筑影响的实测分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2009, 42(10): 88-96.
[9] 徐岱, 陶铸, 宋德鑫, 等. 临近地铁隧道深基坑工程实例研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2016, 44(6): 33-38.
[10] Ou, C.Y., Liao, J.T. and Cheng, W.L. (2000) Building Response and Ground Movements Induced by a Deep Excavation. Geotechnique, 50, 209-220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 聂宗泉, 张尚根, 孟少平. 软土深基坑开挖地表沉降评估方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(8): 1218-1223.
[12] Wang, J.H., Xu, Z.H. and Wang, W.D. (2010) Wall and Ground Movements due to Deep Excavations in Shanghai Soft Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136, 985-994.
[13] Peng, F.L., Wang, H.L., Tan, Y., et al. (2011) Field Measurements and FEM Simulation of a Tunnel Shaft Constructed by Pneumatic Caisson Method in Shanghai Soft Ground. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137, 516-524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 任建喜, 引合, 张琨, 等. 西安地铁车站深基坑变形规律FLAC模拟研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2011(3): 90-93.