PiCCO在脓毒性休克患者EGDT中的研究进展(综述)
Research Progress of PiCCO on EGDT in Patients with Septic Shock
摘要: 脓毒性休克(Septic shock)是由于全身性感染导致多器官功能受损为特点的一种综合征,是重症加强治疗病房(Intensive care unit, ICU)患者常见的死亡原因之一。脓毒性休克患者的主要临床表现为血流动力学紊乱,因此精确的血流动力学评估和快速准确的液体复苏对疾病的治疗非常重要。PiCCO即脉搏指示连续性排出量监测(Pulse indicator continuous cardiac output),是一种结合动脉脉搏轮廓连续心排血量监测与经肺热稀释心排血量监测的新型血流动力学监测技术,具有临床操作简单、对患者机体损伤小、参数更直观全面等优点,能更好地指导脓毒性休克患者早期目标导向液体治疗(Early goal directed fluid therapy, EGDT),减少因过度补液引起的肺水肿和肺部感染加重,减少心功能衰竭的发生,提高液体复苏治疗成功率,有助于患者近期的综合治疗,但对于脓毒性休克患者远期转归无明显改善。
Abstract: Septic shock is a syndrome characterized by multiple organ dysfunction due to systemic infection. It is one of the common causes of death in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. The main clinical manifestation of septic shock patients is hemodynamic disorder, so accurate hemodynamic as-sessment and rapid and accurate fluid resuscitation are very important for the treatment of the disease. PiCCO (Pulse indicator continuous cardiac output) is a new hemodynamic monitoring technology which combines arterial pulse contour continuous cardiac output monitoring and pulmonary heat dilution cardiac output monitoring. PiCCO has the advantages of simple clinical operation, small injury to patients, more intuitive and comprehensive parameters and so on. So it can better guide Early goal directed fluid therapy (EGDT) in patients with septic shock, reduce pulmonary edema and exacerbation of pulmonary infection caused by excessive fluid replacement, reduce the occurrence of heart failure, improve the success rate of liquid resuscitation and help patients to comprehensive treatment in the near future. However, there was no significant im-provement in the long-term outcome of patients with septic shock.
文章引用:刘振菁, 邢学宁. PiCCO在脓毒性休克患者EGDT中的研究进展(综述)[J]. 临床医学进展, 2018, 8(3): 275-280. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2018.83046

参考文献

[1] Rhodes, A., Evans, L.E., Alhazzani, W., et al. (2017) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Man-agement of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Critical Care Medicine, 45, 1-74.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Zaky, A., Gill, E.A., Paul, C.P., et al. (2016) Characteristics of Sepsis-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: A Feasibility Study. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, 44, 65-76.
[3] Bhatia, P.K. and Biyani, G. (2017) Fluid Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Shifting Goalposts. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 59, 269.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 鹿兴, 李彤, 李军, 等. 早期目标导向治疗对严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者病死率影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2015(9): 735-738.
[5] 叶宏伟, 许春阳, 冯玉峰, 等. 每搏量变异度与中心静脉压监测在老年脓毒性休克患者液体复苏治疗中指导作用的比较[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2014, 15(4): 210-213.
[6] Zhang, Z., Xiao, X., Min, Y., et al. (2013) Use of the PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials, 14, 1-8.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Chew, M.S., Ihrman, L., During, J., et al. (2012) Extravascular Lung Water Index Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Injury in Patients with Shock. Critical Care, 16, R1.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 朱玉菡, 沈晓旭, 江其敏, 等. 脉搏指示连续心排血量监测指导脓毒性休克患者治疗效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017, 17(8): 934-940.
[9] 温宇. PiCCO在脓毒性休克早期目标导向治疗中的应用价值探析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(16): 82-83.
[10] Shlyk, I. and Shatovkin, K. (2012) Pulmonary Vascular Permeability in Patients with Burn Sepsis. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 29, 176.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Jozwiak, M., Teboul, J.L. and Monnet, X. (2015) Ex-travascular Lung Water in Critical Care: Recent Advances and Clinical Applications. Annals of Intensive Care, 5, 38.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Hao, W., Na, C., Su, L., et al. (2016) Prognostic Value of Ex-travascular Lung Water and Its Potential Role in Guiding Fluid Therapy in Septic Shock after Initial Resuscitation. Journal of Critical Care, 33, 106-113.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 王剑彬, 王华, 陈启康, 等. 中心静脉压、全心舒张末期容积指数和血管外肺水指数在评估脓毒性休克液体复苏中的作用[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2014, 34(9): 1334-1336.
[14] Latham, H.E., Bengtson C.D., Satterwhite, L., et al. (2017) Stroke Volume Guided Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Improves Outcomes. Journal of Critical Care, 42, 42-46.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Annane, D., Siami, S., Jaber, S., et al. (2013) Effects of Fluid Resuscitation with Colloids vs Crystalloids on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Presenting with Hypovolemic Shock: The CRISTAL Randomized Trial. JAMA, 310, 1809-1817.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 王旭东, 张超, 黄广苏, 等. 脉搏指数连续心排血量监测在脓毒性休克早期液体复苏中的临床价值[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2015, 19(2): 232-234.
[17] 于晓春, 黄昭, 陈裕胜, 等. 脉搏指示连续心排技术在老年脓毒症休克患者液体管理中的应用及对预后的影响[J]. 实用医学杂, 2014, 30(8): 1251-1254.
[18] Dimitrios, V., Vasilios, K., Ioanna, K., et al. (2016) The Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Sepsis Patients: A Literature Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 8, 769-776.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 张雪梅. PiCCO和Swan-Ganz导管血流动力学监测指标的相关性及心衰合剂对急性心衰患者PiCCO血流动力学监测指标的影响的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都中医药大学, 2015.
[20] Halvorsen, P.S., Espinoza, A., Lundblad, R., et al. (2006) Agreement between PiCCO Pulse-Contour Analysis, Pulmonal Artery Thermodilution and Transthoracic Thermodilution during Off-Pump Coronary Artery By-Pass Surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 50, 1050-1057.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Mehri, S.N. (2015) Assessment of the Clinical Effec-tiveness of Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Management of Patients in Intensive Care (PAC-Man): A Randomized Con-trolled Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65, 263-270.
[22] 杨霞, 蒋博, 王峙峰, 等. 脉搏轮廓温度稀释连续测定法与漂浮导管测定心输出量的对比研究[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2014, 16(1): 15-16.
[23] 王助衡, 周冠华, 乔薇, 等. 脉搏指示连续心排血量导管法与肺动脉导管评估血容量的对比研究[J]. 中华危重病医学杂志, 2012, 24(8): 495-496.
[24] Kraft, R., Herndon, D.N., Branski, L.K., et al. (2013) Optimized Fluid Management Improves Outcomes of Pediatric Burn Patients. Journal of Surgical Research, 181, 121-128.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Hadian, M., Kim, H.K., Severyn, D.A., et al. (2010) Cross-Comparison of Cardiac Output Trending Accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and Pulmonary Artery Catheters. Journal of Critical Care, 14, R212.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 王君生. PiCCO和超声评估脓毒性休克容量反应性的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2017.
[27] 顾亚楠. PiCCO与心脏彩色多普勒超声测量脓毒性休克心排血量的比较[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 新疆: 新疆医科大学, 2013.
[28] Horster, S., Stemmler, H.J., Sparrer, J., et al. (2012) Mechanical Ventilation with Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Critically Ill Patients: Comparison of CW-Doppler Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitoring (USCOM) and Thermodilution (PiCCO). Acta Cardiologica, 67, 177-185.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Moraes, M.C.M. (2015) Critical Care: EGDT Does Not Improve Outcomes in Septic Shock. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 11, 254.
[30] Yealy, D.M., Kellum, J.A., Huang, D.T., et al. (2014) A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 1683-1693.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Priebe, H.J. (2015) Early Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Septic Shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 373, 1301-1311.
[32] Peake, S.L., Delaney, A., Bailey, M., et al. (2014) Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Patients with Early Septic Shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 1496-1506.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] 周小洋, 李莉, 严静. 功能性血流动力学监测的现状与展望[J]. 中华危重病医学杂志, 2015, 27(1): 68-70.