回归再时效温度对Al-Zn-Mg合金性能的影响
Effects of the Temperature in RRA on Al-Zn-Mg Alloy
DOI: 10.12677/MS.2018.85073, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 赵 龙, 叶凌英, 邓运来, 邓舒浩:中南大学材料科学与工程学院,湖南 长沙;张 臻, 钱鹏伟:中南大学有色金属先进结构材料与制造协同创新中心,湖南 长沙
关键词: Al-Zn-Mg铝合金三级时效力学性能电化学腐蚀Al-Zn-Mg Aluminum Three-Step Aging Property Electrochemical Corrosion
摘要: 通过电导率、硬度、拉伸、电化学腐蚀以及透射分析等实验,研究了回归再时效(RRA)中预时效温度和第三级时效温度的改变对Al-Zn-Mg铝合金型材的力学性能和电化学腐蚀性能的影响。研究了其两个阶段温度的变化对实验结果产生的相互作用以及对实验结果产生的影响。结果表明:110℃/24 h + 185℃ /105 min + 120℃/24 h合金拉伸强度最高,腐蚀性能一般。110℃/24 h + 185℃/105 min + 150℃/24 h合金耐腐蚀性能最好,但拉伸强度最差;较高的预时效温度会加快晶内析出η相,回归时效时不能溶解η相,从而加速合金在第三级时效产生过时效,获得较好的耐腐蚀性能。
Abstract: Through the test of conductivity, hardness, tensile strength, electrochemical corrosion and TEM, the effect of mechanical properties and electrochemical corrosion properties of the Al-Zn-Mg aluminum during preaging and the third step aging in Retrogression and Re-ageing was investigated. The effect of the result between the different temperatures in preaging and third step aging was studied. The results show that after the treatment of 110˚C/24 h + 185˚C/105 min + 120/24 h, the tensile strength of the alloy is the highest, but the electrochemical corrosion property is bad. After the treatment of 110˚C/24 h + 185˚C/105 min + 150˚C/24 h, the electrochemical corrosion property is the best while the tensile strength is the worst. The higher preaging temperature could accelerate the precipitation reaction of η which won’t be dissolved in retrogression; it accelerates the alloy to over aging to obtain better corrosion resistance.
文章引用:赵龙, 叶凌英, 邓运来, 张臻, 钱鹏伟, 邓舒浩. 回归再时效温度对Al-Zn-Mg合金性能的影响[J]. 材料科学, 2018, 8(5): 617-624. https://doi.org/10.12677/MS.2018.85073

参考文献

[1] 王炎金, 丁国华. 铝合金车体制造关键技术研究[J]. 焊接, 2007(7): 12-16.
[2] 张允康, 许晓静, 罗勇, 吴桂潮, 宋涛, 张振强. Al-Zn-Mg-Cu系合金微合金化的研究现状与展望[J]. 热加工工艺, 2012, 41(6): 18-21
[3] 刘静安. 大型工业铝合金型材的挤压生产工艺与关键技术(续) [J]. 铝加工, 2001, 24(2): 1-6
[4] 杨修波. Al-Zn-Mg(Cu)合金的热处理、微观结构与性能研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2014.
[5] 李威威, 左孝青, 刘占勇, 胡松. 高强韧铝合金的组织特征及其研究进展[J]. 热加工工艺, 2015(10): 12-15.
[6] Liao, C.M. Al-3.7%Zn-2.5%Mg (重量比)合金在3.5% NaCl溶液中焊接前后的SCC性能[J]. 铝加工技术, 1994(4): 43-50.
[7] Heinz, A., Haszler, A., Keidel, C., Moldenhauer, S., Benedictus, R. and Miller, W.S. (2000) Recent De-velopment in Aluminum Alloys for Aerospace Applications. Materials Science and Engineering A, 280, 102-107.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chen, K.-H. and Huang, L.-P. (2003) Strengthening Toughening of 7xxx Series High Strength Aluminum Alloys by Heat Treatment. Trans Nonferrous MetSoc China, No. 3, 0484-07.
[9] 张建波, 张永安, 何振波, 等. 自然时效对7N01铝合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 稀有金属, 2012, 36(2): 1191-195.
[10] Cina, B. (1974) Reducing the Susceptibility of Alloy, Particularly Aluminum Alloys to Stress Corrosion Cracking. Pat. 3856584, US patent, Office, Washington, DC.
[11] Park, J.K. and Ardell, A.J. (1984) Effect of Retrogression and Reaging Treatments on the Microstructure of Ai-7075-T651. Metallurgical and Materials Trans-actions A, 15A, 1531-1543.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 钱鹏伟, 邓运来, 张臻, 赵龙, 唐鸿远, 叶凌英. 自然时效对Al-Zn-Mg合金型材抗应力腐蚀性能影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2017, 27(8): 1542-1550.
[13] 肖涛, 林化强, 叶凌英, 孙琳, 邓运来. 腐蚀条件对Al-Zn-Mg铝合金强韧性能的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2016, 26(7): 1391-1399.
[14] 王井井, 黄元春, 刘宇, 许天成. 时效工艺对Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr-Er铝合金组织与耐腐蚀性的影响[J]. 有色金属科学与工程, 2018(2).
[15] 张臻, 邓运来, 郭辉, 钱鹏伟, 唐鸿远, 叶凌英. 应变速率对Al-Zn-Mg合金室温拉伸性能的影响[J]. 功能材料, 2017, 48(7): 7215-7220.