保水型缓释玉米专用肥料研制及施肥效应研究
Study on Development and Fertilization Effect of Special Fertilizer of Water-Retaining Type Solow-Release Corn
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2018.85078, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王平生*, 杨 霞, 韩 宏, 黄青岩, 张 芳, 白海鸿:甘肃临夏州农业科学院,甘肃 临夏;蔡立群, 吴 军:甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 玉米保水型缓释肥专用肥研制施肥效应Maize Water-Retention Type Slow-Release Fertilizer Development of Special Fertilizer Fertilization Effect
摘要: 目的:设计春玉米保水型缓释玉米专用肥料研发,研究不同缓释肥用量水平下玉米的综合农艺性状、施肥料效率和经济效益,为玉米生产提供科学合理的施肥依据。方法:研讨确定保水型缓释玉米专用肥料的工艺配方,有机肥包裹无机肥、添加缓释剂和保水剂等材料,对辊造粒机制造缓释肥料;以氮素养分为指标,用25℃水溶液溶出率法测定氮素累计释放率;用肥料氮、磷、钾养分测定标准检测养分含量。采用田间小区试验,以玉米新品种“金凯8号”为材料,设5个处理,分别为:缓释专用肥0 kg/hm2 (对照,CK)、缓释专用肥900 kg/hm2 (ZF1)、缓释专用肥1200 kg/hm2 (ZF2)和缓释专用肥1500 kg/hm2 (ZF3)、不施肥(CK)、最佳施肥参数组合(OPT)即(N 270 kg/hm2 + P2O5 120 kg/hm2 + K2O 45 kg/hm2),研究缓释肥不同施肥处理对玉米产量及其构成因素、肥料利用效率及经济效益的影响;研究不同粒径缓释肥料对玉米施肥效应的影响。结果:研发出了保水型缓释玉米专用肥料,经肥料缓释性和养分测定符合相关标准;缓释肥大粒径颗粒肥料相对于小粒径增产10.3%。总结提出了该区合理的施肥量范围为900.0~1355.0 kg/hm2,最高产量施肥量为1355.0 kg/hm2,与OPT处理的氮素和总养分量分别减量11.7%和19.0%,即缓释肥用量900.0 kg/hm2时,玉米产量、氮素农学利用率、农学效率、肥料偏生产力及施肥效益,分别提高了−0.7%、3.8%、1.5kg/kg、8.4 kg/kg和85.7元/hm2。结论:研发出保水型缓释玉米专用肥料,选择出适宜的肥料粒径为4~6 mm;综合产量、生长、养分利用效率和施肥效益等方面考虑,缓释肥用量900.0 kg/hm2是该地区玉米合理施肥、区域农业面源污染防控和简化栽培的最佳经济用量。
Abstract: Objective: For exploring the product development of the fertilizer with the properties of water retention’s and nutrients’ slow release for maize, and investigating the agronomic characters, fertilizer efficiency and economic benefit under different slow release fertilizer addition levels, what’s more, supplying the scientific and reasonable theoretical basis for maize cultivation. Method: The study was carried out to determine product formula of the slow release fertilizer by the roller granulator, and production formula included the following materials: organic fertilizer parcel inorganic fertilizer, slow release agent and water-retaining agent. Nitrogen literacy is divided into indicators with 25˚C aqueous dissolution rate method determination of nitrogen accumulated release rate. Nutrient content was determined by the standard of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in fertilizers. The experiment was laid out in a maize (cv. Jinkai8) field. The field experiment was consisted of different fertilization practices; experimental work included the following treatments: CK (0 kg slow release fertilizer∙hm−2), ZF1 (900 kg slow release fertilizer∙hm−2), ZF2 (1200 kg slow release fertilizer∙hm−2), ZF3 (1500 kg slow release fertilizer∙hm−2), OPT (N 270 kg∙hm−2 + P2O5 120 kg∙hm−2 + K2O 45 kg∙hm−2. This study was aimed to determine the effects of different fertilization practices on the agronomic characters, fertilizer efficiency and economic benefit, and the effect of different slow release fertilizer size classes on maize fertilization. Result: The fertilizer with the properties of water retention’s and nutrients’ slow release was produced and conformed to relevant standards. The grain yield under larger size particle fertilizer addition was 10.3% higher than that of smaller size particle fertilizer addition. The fertilizer application amount for maize in this region was obtained, the range is 900.0~1355.0 kg∙hm−2, and 1355.0 kg slow release fertilizer∙hm−2 addition exhibited the highest grain yield. The grain yield of maize, nitrogen use efficiency, agronomic efficiency, fertilizer partial productivity and fertilization were increased by −0.7%, 3.8%, 1.5 kg∙kg−1, 8.4 kg∙kg−1 and 85.7 RMB∙hm−2 under 900 kg slow release fertilizer∙hm−2 addition, respectively. Conclusion: The special fertilizer with the properties of water retention’s and nutrients’ slow release for maize was obtained, and the appropriate size class was 4~6 mm. In consideration of the yield, growth, nutrient utilization efficiency, fertilization benefits, etc., the fertilizer application level of 900.0 kg∙hm−2 was the optimal level in this region which can provide reasonable fertilization for maize, prevent and control regional agricultural non-point source pollution and simplify the cultivation procedure.
文章引用:王平生, 蔡立群, 杨霞, 韩宏, 黄青岩, 吴军, 张芳, 白海鸿. 保水型缓释玉米专用肥料研制及施肥效应研究[J]. 农业科学, 2018, 8(5): 512-521. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2018.85078

参考文献

[1] 安江勇, 葛皓, 肖厚军, 等. 施用缓释肥对玉米产量及其性状和品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(5): 2148-2153.
[2] 宇万太, 赵鑫, 张璐, 马强. 长期施肥对作物产理的贡献[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(12): 2040-2044.
[3] 王旭, 李贞宇, 马文奇, 等. 中国主要生态区小麦施肥增产效应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(12): 2469-2476.
[4] 陈雅君, 闰庆伟, 张璐, 等. 氮素与植物生长相关研究进展[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2013, 44(4): 144-148.
[5] 陈雪娇, 杨丹丹, 李贵桐, 等. 不同温度生物质炭复混肥对小白菜和樱桃萝卜产量及硝酸盐的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(34): 30-34.
[6] 张培苹. 施用缓释肥料对夏玉米产量的影响试验[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2014, 20(16): 30-31, 56.
[7] 汪家铭. 新型肥料研制开发与应用进展[J]. 氮肥技术, 2013, 34(3): 44-46.
[8] 王火焰, 周健民. 肥料养分真实利用率计算与施肥策略[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(2): 216-225.
[9] 张富锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915-924.
[10] 丁志. 缓释长效剂的研制及其应用[J]. 干旱区研究, 2000, 17(1): 67-70.
[11] 董智, 邓林军, 董俊, 等. 辽西地区应用缓释肥料对玉米产量及生产效益的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2017(2): 13-16.
[12] 杜衍红, 蒋恩臣, 王明峰, 等. 炭基缓释肥对玉米生长的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(12): 72-76.
[13] 王平生, 马忠民, 韩宏, 等. 施氮量对北方梯田旱地玉米产量、氮素利用及土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2016, 5(3): 150-158.
[14] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 263-265.
[15] 李文彪, 郑海春, 郜翻身, 等. 内蒙古河套灌区春小麦推荐施肥指标体系研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(6): 1327-1334.
[16] 景旭东, 林海琳, 阎杰. 新型缓释/控释肥包膜材料的研究与展望[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(2): 139-141, 242.
[17] Novotny, V. and Olem, H. (1993) Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
[18] 张木, 唐拴虎, 张发宝, 等. 60天释放期缓释尿素可实现早稻和晚稻的一次性基施[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1): 119-127.
[19] 陈序根, 徐卫红, 王崇力, 等. 脲酶硝化双抑制剂缓释肥提高番茄产量及NPK养分吸收[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(21): 168-176.
[20] 柳明株, 倪博立. 环境友好型多功能缓控释肥料的制备及性能研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2012.
[21] 姜安龙, 易晶晶, 余晓青, 等. 海藻酸钠水凝胶对尿素的缓释效果研究[J]. 现代化工, 2015, 35(7): 86-88.
[22] 王炳贤, 索东让, 孙宁科. 河西走廊春玉米需肥规律研究[J]. 农业科技与信息, 土壤肥料, 2013(17): 34-37.
[23] 张勇, 吕新春, 黄祥川, 等. 不同包膜缓释肥料对夏玉米生长和产量影响的研究分析[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2016, 31(2): 50-52.
[24] 郭跃升, 马荣辉, 高瑞杰, 等. 高效缓释肥在鲁中夏玉米上的应用效果试验示范[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(7): 78-80, 90.
[25] 赵欢, 唐兵, 张萌, 等. 缓释肥减量施用对覆膜栽培玉米产量与养分吸收及利用率的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(12): 2877-2882.
[26] 王宜伦, 卢艳丽, 刘举, 等. 专用缓释肥对玉米产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015, 10(1): 29-32.