福建西北地区典型边坡稳定性评价及预控措施
Stability Evaluation and Pre-Control Methods for Typical Slope in Northwest Fujian
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2018.73063, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘纪峰*:三明学院建筑工程学院,福建 三明;工程材料与结构加固福建省高等学校重点实验室(三明学院),福建 三明;贾 健:福建省闽西地质大队,福建 三明
关键词: 福建西北地区典型边坡稳定性评价滑坡治理Northwest Fujian Province Typical Slope Stability Evaluation Landslide Control
摘要: 为探讨福建三明某公路边坡的稳定性影响因素及其预控措施,基于岩土工程勘察,分析了该滑坡区的地质环境和滑坡基本特征,讨论了滑坡的影响因素及形成机制,对滑坡进行了监测和稳定性分析,结果表明:该滑坡场地内岩土体组分较多,地质条件复杂,属中厚层中型牵引式岩土质滑坡,其防治工程等级为二级;初步判定场地类别属II类,特征周期0.35 s;滑坡治理应考虑滑坡类型成因、滑坡形态、工程地质和水文地质条件、滑坡稳定性、工程重要性、施工影响等因素,宜采用排水、削方减载、支挡、锚固等工程措施进行综合治理,并加强对滑坡区地表裂缝、地下水位及位移的监测,以保障施工安全。
Abstract: In order to discuss stability affecting factors of a highway slope in Sanming city, Fujian Province, and to present its pre-control measures, based on the geotechnical investigation results, the geological environment and the basic characteristics of the landslide are analyzed; the influencing factors and the formation mechanism of the landslide are discussed; the monitoring and stability analysis of the landslide are carried out. The results show that there are more soil components in the landslide site; and the geological condition is complex; the landslide is middle or thick middle size tractive rock landslides; and its control engineering grade is the second grade. The preliminary classification of site category belongs to class II and characteristic cycle is 0.35 s. The landslide control should consider the causes of landslides, landslides shape, engineering geology and hydro-geological conditions, landslide stability and engineering importance etc. In order to ensure the safety of construction, the monitoring of surface cracks, groundwater level and displacement in the landslide area should be strengthened, and the comprehensive treatment of drainage, chipping, load reduction, support and anchorage methods should be adopted to pre-control the landslide.
文章引用:刘纪峰, 贾健. 福建西北地区典型边坡稳定性评价及预控措施[J]. 土木工程, 2018, 7(3): 547-557. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2018.73063

参考文献

[1] 伍宇明, 兰恒星, 高星, 等. 台风暴雨型滑坡降雨阈值曲线研究——以福建地区为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(2): 255-262.
[2] 杨金旺, 陈媛, 张林, 等. 基于地质力学模型试验综合法的顺层岩质高边坡稳定性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(1): 131-140.
[3] 叶龙珍, 黄国平, 柳侃. 福建池头古老滑坡特征及局部复活影响因素[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2014, 25(2): 19-25.
[4] 陈文林. 福建沿海典型潜在滑坡的稳定性分析与评价——以安溪县郭厝垵滑坡为例[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2016, 28(6): 68-72.
[5] 王浩, 林一夫, 梁涛, 等. 福建山区高速公路路堑高边坡风险分级方法研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2016, 24(4): 492-500.
[6] 林兴旺, 简文斌, 董岩松, 等. 台风暴雨条件下福建霞碧滑坡渗流稳定性分析[J]. 路基工程, 2015(2): 36-41.
[7] 刘纪峰, 卢明师. 含水率对边坡土性及其稳定性的影响[J]. 河南科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 31(3): 63-66.
[8] 卢明师, 刘纪峰. 含水率对厚土坡变形影响的FLAC3D数值模拟研究[J]. 三明学院学报, 2009, 26(4): 461-464+5.