AIRVO与人工鼻在高位截瘫气管切开造口患者中应用效果比较
Effect of AIRVO and Artificial Nose in High Paraplegia Patients with Tracheotomy
DOI: 10.12677/NS.2018.73017, PDF,   
作者: 金小芳, 彭 琳, 梁玮玮, 韩文军:海军军医大学附属长海医院麻醉学部SICU,上海
关键词: AIRVO人工鼻气管切开气道湿化高位截瘫AIRVO Artificial Nose Tracheotomy Airway Humidification High Paraplegia
摘要: 目的:比较AIRVO (高流量湿化治疗仪)与人工鼻(一次性湿热交换器)在ICU高位截瘫气管切开患者撤离呼吸机后气道管理中的临床应用效果。方法:回顾分析了2016年1月至2017年6月,我院ICU在引进AIRVO前后,53例因高位截瘫行气管切开造口患者在撤离呼吸机后的气道湿化方法,其中2016年1月~9月的27例为人工鼻湿化组,2016年10月~2017年6月的26例为AIRVO湿化组,比较两组患者撤离呼吸机后48h气道湿化效果、氧疗效果与肺部感染发生率。结果:AIRVO组的湿化与氧疗效果均优于人工鼻组,肺部感染发生率低于人工鼻组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:撤离呼吸机后的ICU气管切开造口患者应用AIRVO可明显提高气道湿化、氧疗效果、降低肺部感染率、具备兼容性好和精确调控输入量等优点,值得临床推广使用。
Abstract: Objective: To compare the application effect of AIRVO (High flow humidification Therapeutic in-strument) and artificial nose (Disposable damp heat exchanger) in airway management of high paraplegia patients with tracheotomy after ventilator withdrawal in ICU. Methods: 53 high parap-legia patients who were evacuated from ventilator after tracheotomy in our ICU from January 2016 to June 2017 were selected as study objects. A retrospective analysis of 27 patients with high paraplegia admitted from January 2016 to September 2016 after evacuation of the ventilator was performed using artificial nasal airway humidification as the control group. From October 2016 to June 2017, 26 patients with high paraplegia who were evacuated from the ventilator used AIRVO for airway humidification as observation group. On the basis of conventional treatment, the humi-dification effect, oxygen therapeutic effect and pulmonary infection rate of the two groups were compared after evacuation of the ventilator 48 h. Results: The effect of humidification and oxygen therapy in the study group was better than that in the control group, and the incidence of pulmo-nary infection was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of AIRVO in ICU patients with tracheotomy after evacuation of ventilator can significantly improve airway humidification, oxygen therapy effect and reduce pulmonary infection rate. In addition, AIRVO has the advantages of good compatibility and precise control of input, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
文章引用:金小芳, 彭琳, 梁玮玮, 韩文军. AIRVO与人工鼻在高位截瘫气管切开造口患者中应用效果比较[J]. 护理学, 2018, 7(3): 95-100. https://doi.org/10.12677/NS.2018.73017

参考文献

[1] 王燕华, 贺艳, 周伯军. 气管切开非机械通气患者使用高流量湿化治疗仪的护理[J]. 全科护理, 2017, 15(16): 1972-1973.
[2] 万华, 陈映辉. 创伤性高位截瘫患者气管切开术的临床分析[J]. 中国医疗前沿, 2012, 7(12): 35-36.
[3] 刘欣悦, 刘芳, 魏娜. 两种雾化方式对呼吸机撤离早期神经内科ICU患者气道湿化的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2010, 16(25): 3078-3080.
[4] 陈立萍, 宗永忠, 李青荷, 等. 使用人工鼻联合持续气道湿化技术湿化液量探讨[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2012, 27(18): 1644-1646.
[5] Sztrymf, B., Messika, J., Mayol, T., et al. (2012) Impact of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on ICU Pa-tients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Critical Care, 27, 324.
[6] 解军丽. 人工鼻和高流量湿化治疗仪(AIRVO)对人工气道患者临床疗效对比[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2016, 8(35): 120-122.
[7] 顾鞠, 刘英新, 徐志香. 人工气道湿化的研究进展[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2012, 31(1): 16-18.
[8] 蓝惠兰, 邓旭萍, 陈瀚熙, 等. 机械通气呼吸湿化器湿化研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志, 2013, 28(13): 94-97.
[9] Branson, R.D. (2007) Secretion Management in the Mechanically Ventilated Patient. Working Paper of Public Health, 52, 1328.
[10] 张鹏, 魏鹏. 高流量湿化治疗仪在ICU机械通气患者撤离呼吸机后的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(9): 33-36.
[11] 范海鹏, 吴耀建. 经皮气管切开在颈椎骨折合并呼吸障碍中的应用[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2011, 39(4): 669-671.
[12] 俞森洋. 现代呼吸治疗学[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2006: 358.
[13] 袁月华, 徐培峰, 陈恋, 等. 呼吸道湿化的进展[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2014, 37(11): 852-854.
[14] 吴美英, 曾菁. 气管切开患者两种人工气道湿化方法的效果比较[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2011, 33(6): 138-140.
[15] 许芬. 持续气道湿化在气管切开术后的应用与护理[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(20): 173-174.
[16] 赵彦卓, 魏琼. 高流量湿化治疗仪在气管插管患者脱机后的应用[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2016, 29(6): 100-101.
[17] 刘利荣, 王欣然. 人工鼻在人工气道中应用的研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2005, 19(23): 2080-2081.
[18] 吴叶. 国内人工气道湿化的研究进展[J]. 当代护士旬刊, 2010(4): 6-9.
[19] Nishimura, M. (2016) High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Adults: Physiological Benefits, Indication, Clinical Benefits, and Adverse Effects. Respiratory Care, 61, 529-841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 王晓丹, 张玉想. 经鼻高流量湿化氧疗在急性呼吸衰竭中的作用研究进展[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2017, 37(6): 477-479.
[21] 陈配配, 董丽秀, 叶波, 等. 高流量吸氧湿化仪与无创呼吸机对呼吸衰竭患者的疗效比较[J]. 海南医学, 2017, 28(2): 291-293.