驾驶技能量表的修订及其信效度检验
Reliability and Validity of Self-Assessment of Driving Skills Scale in Chinese Drivers
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.86102, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 马艺丹, 孙 龙:辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁 大连
关键词: 驾驶员驾驶技能驾驶风格交通事故Driver Driving Skill Driving Style Traffic Accident
摘要:
目的:检验中文版驾驶技能量表在我国驾驶员群体中的信度、效度和适用性。方法:使用中文版驾驶技能量表和驾驶风格量表对368名驾驶员进行测量。结果:修订后的驾驶技能量表由7个题目组成,累计方差解释率为55.38%。修订后量表总的内部一致性信度为0.861。量表总分及各个题目得分与驾驶风格量表各维度之间的相关显著,表明量表的结构效度较好。此外,量表总分及各个题目得分与驾驶员在过去一年中的交通事故数目相关显著,表明量表的外部效度较好。结论:修订后的驾驶技能量表具有良好的信度与效度,可以作为测量我国驾驶员驾驶技能的一个有效工具。
Abstract: Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Self-Assessment of Driving Skills Scale (SADS) in Chinese drivers. Methods: 368 drivers agreed to participate in the present study and were asked to complete the SADS and the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI-C). Results: The final version of SADS consisted of 7 items, which can explain 55.38% of the variance. The reliability (Cronbach’s α) of the whole inventory was 0.861. The total score of the SADS is significantly correlated with the dimensions of the MDSI-C, indicating that the construct validity of the scale was good. Additionally, the total score of the SADS was positively correlated with traffic accidents in the driving of past year, indicating the external validity of the scale was good. Conclusion: SADS has good reliability and validity, and it can be used as a tool to assess Chinese drivers’ driving skills in the future.
文章引用:马艺丹, 孙龙 (2018). 驾驶技能量表的修订及其信效度检验. 心理学进展, 8(6), 848-854. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.86102

参考文献

[1] 窦广波, 宋熙, 常若松(2016). 人格对驾驶员危险知觉技能的影响. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 39(4), 46-50.
[2] 孙龙, 常若松(2013). 驾驶风格研究现状与展望. 人类工效学, 19(4), 92-95.
[3] 孙龙, 常若松(2014). 营运驾驶员驾驶风格研究. 人类工效学, 20(3), 10-12.
[4] 孙龙, 常若松(2016). 自我评估的能力与驾驶经验对危险知觉的影响. 心理科学, 39(6), 1346-1352.
[5] 孙龙(2014). 多维度驾驶风格量表的修订及其与驾驶员情绪状态之间的关系研究. 硕士论文, 大连: 辽宁师范大学.
[6] 孙龙, 杨程程, 常若松(2014). 多维度驾驶风格量表的修订及初步应用. 人类工效学, 20(2), 6-9.
[7] Chliaoutakis, J. E. (2006). Cross-Cultural Differences in Driving Skills: A Comparison of Six Countries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9, 227-242.[CrossRef
[8] De Craen, C. S., Twisk, D. A., Hagenzieker, M. P., Elffers, H., & Brookhuis, K. A. (2011). Do Young Novice Drivers Overestimate Their Driving Skills More Than Experienced Drivers? Different Methods Lead to Different Conclusions. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1660-1665.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Dejoy, D. M. (1989). The Optimism Bias and Traffic Accident Risk Per-ception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 21, 333-340.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Dogan, E., Steg, L., Delhomme, P., & Rothengatter, T. (2012). The Effects of Non-Evaluative Feedback on Drivers' Self-Evaluation and Performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 522-528.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993). Behavioral Correlates of Individual Differences in Road-Traffic Crash Risk: An Examination Method and Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 279-294.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] French, D. J., West, R. J., Elander, J., & Wilding, J. M. (1993). Decision-Making Style, Driving Style, and Self-Reported Involvement in Road Traffic Accidents. Ergonomics, 36, 627-644.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (1995). Driving Experience, Personality, and Skill and Safety-Motive Dimensions in Drivers' Self-Assessments. Personality & Individual Differences, 19, 307-318.[CrossRef
[14] Martinussen, L. M., Møller, M., & Prato, C. G. (2014). Assessing the Relationship between the Driver Behavior Questionnaire and the Driver Skill Inventory: Revealing Sub-Groups of Drivers. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 26, 82-91.[CrossRef
[15] Miller, G., & Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. (2010). Driving Styles among Young Novice Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 558-570.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Sundström, A. (2011). The Validity of Self-Reported Driver Competence: Relations between Measures of Perceived Driver Competence and Actual Driving Skill. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 14, 155-163.[CrossRef
[17] Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., & Yehiel, D. (2012). Driving Styles and Their As-sociations with Personality and Motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 416-422.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] White, M. J., Cunningham, L. C., & Titchener, K. (2011). Young Drivers’ Optimism Bias for Accident Risk and Driving Skill: Accountability and Insight Experience Manipulations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43, 1309-1315.[CrossRef] [PubMed]