无芒隐子草(Cleistogenes songorica)叶片生态解剖及氮磷化学计量特征对载畜率的响应
Responses of Cleistogenes songorica Blade Ecological Anatomy and N/P Stoichiometry to Stocking Rates
DOI: 10.12677/BR.2018.74046, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈海军:内蒙古自治区生物技术研究院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;额尔敦花, 王明玖:内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;单玉梅:内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;中国科学院内蒙古草业研究中心,内蒙古 呼和浩特;何丽君:内蒙古农业大学农学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;杨勇:内蒙古自治区草原勘察规划院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;白春利:内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 荒漠草原无芒隐子草解剖结构氮和磷化学计量学载畜率Desert Steppe Cleistogenes songorica Ecological Anatomy Structure N & P Stoichiometry Stocking Rate
摘要: 无芒隐子草为多年生强旱生密丛禾草,是荒漠草原的建群种和优势种,不仅适口性好,而且具有抗热、抗旱、耐寒和耐践踏等特性,对荒漠草原生态系统的恢复和保育具有重要作用。该文以内蒙古荒漠草原无芒隐子草为研究对象,分析了不同载畜率(不放牧、轻度放牧、中度放牧、重度放牧)对无芒隐子草叶片解剖结构和N、P化学计量特征的影响,以探究无芒隐子草叶片上述性状对环境改变的响应与适应对策。结果表明:不同载畜率水平下,无芒隐子草叶片解剖结构除了上、下表皮细胞厚度之外,其余的指标均产生了显著变化(P < 0.05),但随着载畜率的增加没有明显的一致性变化规律。所有的放牧处理均显著增加了无芒隐子草叶片中的全N含量(P < 0.05)。轻度和中度放牧没有显著影响叶片全P含量,而重度放牧显著降低了叶片的全P含量(P < 0.05)。任何放牧处理对叶片N:P比均没有显著影响。在CK条件下,无芒隐子草叶片的全N含量与上表皮细胞面积之间存在显著的负相关(P < 0.05)。在MG条件下,全P含量与上表皮细胞面积之间存在显著的正相关(P < 0.05),同时与主脉厚度之间存在着极显著负相关(P < 0.01)。因此,在不同载畜率下,无芒隐子草叶片解剖结构及N、P化学计量学特征的变化和二者之间的关系均存在一定的差别。
Abstract: Cleistogenes songorica, a perennial herb, is the constructive and dominant species of desert steppe in northern China. With excellent palatability as well as heat/drought/cold tolerance and trampling resistance, this species has significant effects on the restoration and conservation of desert steppe. In order to understand the response and adaption strategy of Cleistogenes songorica to grazing, we carried out field experiment to examine the influence of different stocking rates on its blade anatomy structure and N/P stoichiometry. Leaf samples of Cleistogenes songorica (3rd totally matured and sun-sloped disease-free blade from the top) were collected from a controlled-experimental platform with four stocking densities, which has been lasting for nine years on the desert steppe of Inner Mongolia. Using paraffin method, upper epidermal cuticle thickness, lower epidermis thickness, upper epidermal cell thickness, lower epidermis cell thickness, upper epidermal cell area, lower epidermis cell area, main vein thickness, leaf thickness, measured using high-power microscope. Total N and P contents were measured by Semi-micro kjeldahl determination and the H2SO4-HClO4 fusion method, respectively. All leaf anatomic characters of Cleistogenes songorica, except for upper and lower epidermal cell thickness, showed significant variation among different grazing rates (P < 0.05). However, there was no consistent pattern for the changes of these anatomic characters with the increase of stocking rates. Leaf N and P contents showed limited changes under LG and MG levels. Grazing significantly increased leaf N contents (P < 0.05), with the highest value in HG. Total P contents in HG were significantly lower than the 3 others (P < 0.05). Leaf N:P was highest in HG and lowest in MG. In the control plots, leaf N contents were negatively correlated with upper epidermal cell area (P < 0.05). In the MG plots, total P contents were positively correlated with upper epidermal cell area (P < 0.05) and negatively correlated with main vein thickness (P < 0.05). 
文章引用:陈海军, 额尔敦花, 单玉梅, 何丽君, 杨勇, 白春利, 王明玖. 无芒隐子草(Cleistogenes songorica)叶片生态解剖及氮磷化学计量特征对载畜率的响应[J]. 植物学研究, 2018, 7(4): 375-385. https://doi.org/10.12677/BR.2018.74046

参考文献

[1] Elser, J.J., Dobberfuhl, D., MacKay, N.A. and Schampel, J.H. (1996) Organism Size, Life History, and N:P Cycle. Biogeochemistry, 37, 237-252.
[2] 贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 2-6.
[3] 银晓瑞, 梁存柱, 王立新, 王炜, 刘钟龄, 刘小平. 内蒙古典型草原不同恢复演替阶段植物养分化学计量学[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 39-47.
[4] Bai, Y.F., Wu, J.G., Chris, M.C., Pan, Q.M., Zhang, L.X., Chen, S.P., Wang, Q.B. and Han, X.G. (2012) Grazing Alters Ecosystem Functioning and C:N:P Stoichiometry of Grasslands along a Regional Precipitation Gradient. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 1204-1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 刘超, 王洋, 王楠, 王根轩. 陆地生态系统植被氮磷化学计量研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 3(11): 1205-1216.
[6] 闫瑞瑞, 卫智军, 杨静, 周忠义. 短花针茅草原优势种群特征对不同放牧制度的响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 7(22): 188-191.
[7] 侯牡丹, 王明玖, 李志强, 杨宁, 陈海军. 放牧强度对短花针茅草原3种主要植物营养繁殖性能的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2009, 1(30): 71-75.
[8] Novoplansky, A. (1996) Hierarchy Establishment among Potentially Similar Buds. Plant, Cell and Environment, 19, 781-786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Gordon, I.J. (2003) Browsing and Grazing Ruminants: Are They Different Beasts? Grassland Ecology and Management, 181, 13-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈海军. 荒漠草原主要植物种群繁殖性状及化学计量特征对载畜率的响应[D]: [博士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2011.
[11] Anderson, T.M., Ritchie, M.E., Mayemba, E., Eby, S., Grace, J.B. and McNaughton, S.J. (2007) Forage Nutritive Quality in the Serengeti Ecosystem: The Roles of Fire and Herbivory. The American Naturalist, 170, 343-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 郑学平, 张承烈, 陈国仓. 河西走廊芦苇的光合碳同化途径对生境条件的适应[J]. 植物生态学报, 1993, 17(1): 1-8.
[13] 李玉霖, 崔建垣, 苏永中. 不同沙丘生境主要植物比叶面积和叶干物质含量的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 2(25): 304-311.
[14] 高强. 17种荒漠植物的形态与环境适应性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2011: 1-21.
[15] 赵雪艳, 汪诗平. 不同放牧率对内蒙古典型草原植物叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 6(29): 2913-2916.
[16] 曲涛. 无芒隐子草(Cleistogenes songorica)的抗旱性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2008: 1-21.
[17] Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Loeppert, P.A., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T. and Sumner, M.E. (1996) Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madi-son.
[18] 于向芝, 贺晓, 张韬, 王炜. 内蒙古退化草原8种植物叶结构对禁牧的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 4(27): 1640-1641.
[19] Bussotti, F., Bottaci, A. and Bartolesi, A. (1995) Morphoanatomy Alterations in Leaves Collected from Beech Trees in Condition of Natural Water Stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 35, 201-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 范春梅, 廖超英, 李培玉, 孙长忠, 许喜明. 放牧强度对林草地土壤物理性状的影响——以黄土高原丘陵沟壑区为例[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(7): 1501-1506.
[21] 李芳兰, 包维楷, 吴宁. 岷江上游干旱河谷海拔梯度上四川黄栌(Cotinus szechuanensis)叶片的生态解剖[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2007, 13(4): 486-491.
[22] 李正理, 张新英. 植物解剖学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1983: 246-261.
[23] 王炜, 梁存柱, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元. 羊草+大针茅草原群落退化演替机理的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(3): 268-274.
[24] 董晓玉, 傅华, 李旭东, 牛得草, 郭丁. 放牧与围封对黄土高原典型草原植物生物量及其碳氮磷贮量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(2): 175-182.
[25] 曾德慧, 陈广生. 生态化学计量学: 复杂生命系统奥秘的探索[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6): 1007-1019.
[26] 徐冰, 程雨曦, 甘慧洁, 周文嘉, 贺金生. 内蒙古锡林河流域典型草原植物叶片与细根性状在种间及种内水平上的关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 29-38.
[27] 杨慧敏, 王冬梅. 草-环境系统植物碳氮磷生态化学计量学及其对环境因子的响应研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 244-252.
[28] Güsewell, S. (2004) N:P Ratios in Terrestrial Plants: Variation and Functional Significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Bedford, B.L., Walbridge, M.R. and Aldous, A. (1999) Patterns in Nutrient Availability and Plant Diversity of Temperate North American Wetlands. Ecology, 80, 2151-2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Matson, P.A., McDowell, W.H., Townsend, A.R. and Vitousek, P.M. (1999) The Globalization of N Deposition: Ecosystem Consequences in Tropical Environments. Biogeochemistry, 46, 67-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Townsend, A.R., Cleveland, C.C., Asner, G.P. and Bustamante, M.M.C. (2007) Controls over Foliar N:P Ratios in Tropical Rain Forests. Ecology, 88, 107-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Venterink, H.O., Wassen, M.J., Verkroost, A.W.M. and De Ruiter, P.C. (2003) Species Richness-Productivity Patterns Differ between N-, P-, and K-Limited Wetlands. Ecology, 84, 2191-2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef