早期干预对末端回肠造口周围皮肤损伤发生的影响
The Effect of Early Intervention on Skin Injury in Terminal Ileostomy
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2018.85076, PDF,   
作者: 高炳乾:广西医科大学研究生院,广西壮族自治区肿瘤医院,广西 南宁;林源:广西壮族自治区肿瘤医院,广西 南宁
关键词: 早期干预末端回肠造口皮肤损伤Early Intervention Terminal Ileostomy Skin Injury
摘要: 目的:探讨早期干预对末端回肠造口周围皮肤损伤发生的影响。方法:选择广西壮族自治区肿瘤医院胃肠外科末端回肠造口患者50例,按照随机数字法分为对照组(n = 25),观察组(n = 25),术后对照组予以常规护理,观察组在此基础上予以术前造口定位、心理疏导、皮肤过敏试验、饮食护理等方式行早期干预,观察两组对造口心理接受程度、造口周围皮肤损伤程度等情况。结果:实验组对结肠造口心理接受接受、基本接受程度均显著高于对照组(P < 0.05),实验组对造口完全不能接受患者亦显著少于对照组(P < 0.05),实验组造口周围皮肤0度损伤显著多于对照组(P < 0.05),I度、II度、III度、IV度皮肤损伤显著少于对照组组(P < 0.05)。结论:早期干预可有效提高患者对结肠末端造口心理接受程度,减少造口周围皮肤损伤发生。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effect of early intervention on skin injury in terminal ileostomy. Methods: 50 patients with gastro-enteritis distal ileostomy in gastrointestinal surgery at the Guangxi Tumour Hospital were selected and divided into the control group (n = 25) and observation group (n = 25) according to the random number method. After operation, the control group was given routine nursing care. On this basis, the observation group was given early interventions such as preoperative stoma positioning, psychological counseling, skin allergy tests, and dietary care. The psychological acceptance degree and skin injury around the stoma were observed among two groups. Results: The degree of acceptance and basic acceptance of colostomy in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The patients in the experimental group who were completely unable to accept stoma were also significantly less than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In the experimental group, the 0 degree skin damage around the stoma was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and skin lesions of I, II, III and IV were significantly less than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Early intervention can effectively improve the patient’s psychological acceptance of the distal colostomy and reduce the skin injury around the stoma.
文章引用:高炳乾, 林源. 早期干预对末端回肠造口周围皮肤损伤发生的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2018, 8(5): 460-464. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2018.85076

参考文献

[1] 夏澜. 不同类型肠造口周围皮炎的原因分析及护理对策[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2016, 3(15): 3079-3079.
[2] 黄琼梅, 黄丽明. 肠造口周围皮肤损伤的危险因素分析与对策[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2017(6).
[3] Danielsen, A.K. (2013) Life after Stoma Creation. Danish Medical Journal, 60, B4732.
[4] 郁红菊, 孙茜, 李继婷. 结肠造口周围皮肤并发症的原因及护理[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2009, 22(5): 519-521.
[5] Salvadalena, G.D. (2010) The Incidence of Stoma and Peristomal Complications During the First Three Months after Stoma Creation. Dissertations & Theses - Gradworks, 48, S3.
[6] 梁霞, 梁桂花, 肖旭霞, 等. Miles术后造口周围皮肤损伤的相关因素分析及对策[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2013, 29(6): 22-24.
[7] 张莉萍, 戴晓冬, 许勤, 等. 造口周围皮肤标准护理数字化技术的临床应用研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2015, 31(17): 1272-1275.
[8] 马辉, 杨连招, 阳诺, 等. 不同类型造口袋对造口周围皮肤影响的研究[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2013, 19(1): 59-61.
[9] 匡亚飞. 早期护理干预对回肠造口皮肤并发症的影响研究[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2016, 8(29): 198-200.
[10] 张俊娥, 黄金月, 尤黎明, 等. 电话干预对结肠造口患者自我护理的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(12): 1073-1077.
[11] 孙学珍. 回肠造口周围重度皮肤损伤原因分析及护理对策[C]//第七届全国大肠癌学术会议暨第十届广东省大肠癌学术会议论文集. 广州, 2009: 347-349.
[12] Warschkow, R. (2011) Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Resection and Re-construction with Colorectostomy. A Retrospective Study with Bootstrap Analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 18, 2772.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 刘广, 边远, 鲁立峰, 等. 末段回肠置管造口预防中低位直肠癌术后吻合口漏[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(8): 743-745.
[14] Fjeldsoe, B.S., Marshall, A.L. and Miller, Y.D. (2009) Behavior Change Interventions Delivered by Mobile Telephone Short-Message Service. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, 165-173.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 吴玲, 羊丽芳, 李菊云, 等. 永久性肠造口居家护理平台的设计及在江苏省的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2017(10): 1192-1194.
[16] 何晓花, 吴美华, 朱畅惠. 32例回肠造口周围皮肤损伤的原因及护理对策[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2017, 39(1): 165-166.