胖负面身体自我女大学生的体重知觉

Weight Perception of Fat Negative Physical Female College Students

摘要: 本研究旨在重点研究胖负面身体自我女大学生的体重知觉，从实际体重指数、理想体重指数、体重社会标准、体重知觉偏差四个方面收集数据。进行测查的主要实验材料为女性身体图形评定量表PFRS (the female Photographic Figure Rating Scale)，题目设置分别涉及体重自我知觉(认为哪幅图能准确代表自己的胖瘦)、主观社会标准(认为在异性眼中哪幅图最有吸引力)以及对其他女大学生的体重估计，用以上指标衍生出的主要数据结果进行统计分析。在进行PERS之前首先用负面身体自我量表-胖分量表(Negative Physical Self Scale, NPSS-F)筛选出每道题的平均得分大于2.5者，即胖负面身体自我女大学生为实验组，得分低于2.5者归入控制组。研究实验组与控制组在各项体重知觉指标上是否有明显差异，并引入男性视角。研究结果表明：胖负面身体自我女大学生对自己的体重有较准确的知觉，但是由于实际体重较重，感受到的体重社会压力较大，同时由于理想体重的设定不合适，体重不满也较强烈；男性的审美标准在女大学生看来呈现严重的以瘦为美的状态，但与男性的实际情况不符。

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to focus on weight perception of female college students who are overweight and obese, and collect data from four aspects of actual body mass index, ideal body weight index, body weight social standard, weight perception deviation. This research mainly sets the female Photographic Figure Rating Scale as research material, and subject setting involves female college students’ self-perception, subjective social standard of weight and female college students’ perception of others’ weight, using the deviation of these indexes and the actual value as the primary data for statistical analysis. Before the PERS first uses Negative Physical Self Scale, NPSS-F screens those students whose score is greater than 2.5 as the experimental group, and those whose score is less than 2.5 are the control group. This research discovers whether there are obvious differences in the weight perception indexes between the fat negative physical self of female college students and the control group of female college students, and male perspective is introduced. The results indicate that: the fat negative physical self of female college students on their weight has accurate perception, but due to the heavier actual body weight, they feel larger weight social pressure, and due to the unsuitable setting ideal body weight, weight dissatisfaction is stronger; female college students think aesthetic standards of men are harsh, but it is inconsistent with the evaluation of boy students.