一种压裂液管柱摩阻求取方法
A Calculation Method for Fracturing Fluid Friction
DOI: 10.12677/ME.2018.63024, PDF,   
作者: 张 军:川庆钻探工程有限公司长庆井下技术作业公司,陕西 西安
关键词: 压裂液摩阻降阻比小管径实验放大方法Fracturing Fluid Friction Antifriction Ratio Small ID Tubing Test Magnification
摘要: 在油管压裂工程设计与分析过程中,由于考虑压裂液管柱摩阻,施工压力和施工排量的设计除考虑地层因素外,不得不考虑井筒管材和施工管柱所承受的最大压力,对依据储层条件科学合理地进行储层改造造成了很大的障碍。同时在压裂施工过程中,为确保压裂施工的成功率和减少井筒复杂,在计算施工压力和提升作业排量时,压裂液管柱摩阻必须纳入计算或估算范围内。但在实际情况中,由于成本、施工时间的影响,并不能将每种压裂液摩阻进行现场实测,同时运用摩阻经验计算公式对特定的压裂液计算的管柱摩阻误差较大,因此需要在实验室对每种压裂液进行实验,测试其在实验室条件下的管柱摩阻,然后将其得到的结果转化成现场条件下的摩阻。利用小管径实验将得到的管柱摩阻结果按现场比例放大能很好的指导现场压裂施工,对施工人员实时判断施工真实压力大小提供了参考。同时利用该方法能减小摩阻经验公式计算的误差,对提高压裂工程设计质量和压后分析起到很好的帮助作用。
Abstract: Because of the fracturing fluid friction, besides of the formation factors, the fracturing design and analysis of operation pressure and discharge rate have to consider the max pressure for the well-bore tubing and operation tubing, which causes lots of obstacles for the scientific and reasonable reservoir stimulation. At the same time, to ensure a success fracturing and reduce the wellbore failure in the stimulation operation, the fracturing liquid friction must be considered when calcu-late the operation pressure and increase the discharge rate. However, in the real situation, because of the limited cost and operation time, friction for each fluid cannot be tested on site. At the same time, calculated friction by the empirical formula for the specific fluid will cause some error. Therefore, each fluid friction should be tested in lab, and then transform the lab results into loca-tion friction. The small ID tubing test friction results can guide the location operation well by ratio magnification, which also provide reference for the location operators to judge the real pressure in real time. It also provides a good way to reduce the calculation errors for the empirical formula, improve the fracturing design quality and useful analysis after fracturing.
文章引用:张军. 一种压裂液管柱摩阻求取方法[J]. 矿山工程, 2018, 6(3): 175-182. https://doi.org/10.12677/ME.2018.63024

参考文献

[1] 苏权生. 压裂施工管柱摩阻计算[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2015(19): 78-79.
[2] 黄禹忠. 川西地区压裂施工过程中管柱摩阻计算[J]. 特种油气藏, 2005, 12(6): 71-73.
[3] 曲冠政, 曲占庆, 岳艳如. 压裂施工曲线诊断方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(5): 1281-1284.
[4] 路智勇. 压裂施工动态摩阻模型建立及其敏感性分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2013, 20(6): 783-787.
[5] 杜发勇, 张恩仑, 等. 压裂施工中管路摩阻计算方法分析与改进意见探讨[J]. 钻采工艺, 2002, 25(5): 41-43.
[6] 郭建春, 杨立君, 赵金洲, 等. 压裂过程中孔眼摩阻计算的改进模型及应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2005, 25(5): 69-71.
[7] 孔庆利. 考虑流变特性改变的水力压裂管内摩阻计算模型研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013(14): 3995-3999.
[8] 陈俊, 等. 用表观黏度计算幂律流体摩阻的方法及其应用[J]. 西安石油学院学报(自然科学版), 2003, 18(6): 58-62.
[9] Lord, D.L. (1987) Turbulent Flow of Stimulation Fluids: An Evaluation of Friction Loss Scale-Up Methods. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 27-30 September 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 刘合, 张广明, 等. 油井水力压裂摩阻计算和井口压力预测[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(A01): 2833-2839.
[11] 王鸿勋, 张士诚. 水力压裂设计数值计算方法[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1998.
[12] 向洪, 张宁县. 牛东区块压裂过程中施工管柱摩阻分析与计算[J]. 吐哈油气, 2010, 15(3): 267-269.
[13] 郭建春, 王世彬, 伍林. 超高温改性瓜胶压裂液性能研究与应用[J]. 油田化学, 2011, 28(2): 201-205.
[14] 刁素, 龙永平, 任山, 等. 压裂液缝内黏滞阻力实验研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2012, 19(6): 778-780.
[15] 黄朝阳, 等. 三种压裂液体系在苏里格气田现场施工应用中的比较[J]. 钻采工艺, 2011, 34(5): 104-106.