催产素静滴引产产妇的心理护理干预措施分析
Analysis of the Psychological Nursing Intervention Measures of Oxytocin Intravenous Drip of Induced Labor
DOI: 10.12677/NS.2018.74031, PDF,   
作者: 李中朝:江苏省宝应县第二人民医院妇产科,江苏 扬州
关键词: 心理护理催产素引产阴道分娩剖宫产Psychological Nursing Oxytocin Induced Labor Vaginal Delivery Cesarean Section
摘要: 目的:探讨心理护理干预措施在催产素静滴引产产妇中的应用效果。方法:选取2015年1月~2016年3月我院收治的有催产素静滴引产指征产妇80例,随机分为心理护理组与对照组,每组40例。对照组采用常规的基础护理措施,心理护理组产妇在对照组基础上采用以心理护理干预措施为主的针对性护理。比较两组产妇分娩方式、剖宫产原因、护理满意度、临产时间、分娩后出血量。结果:心理护理组产妇阴道分娩率为90.0%,高于对照组(70.0%),差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 5.000, p = 0.025)。与对照组相比,心理护理组产妇难以忍受宫缩引起疼痛发生率较低(χ2 = 4.114, p = 0.043)。心理护理组产妇非常满意度、总满意度为75.0%、92.5%,高于对照组(52.5%, 80.0%),差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 4.381, 5.541; p = 0.036, 0.019)。与对照组相比,心理护理组产妇临产时间较短,分娩后出血量较少(p < 0.001)。结论:心理护理干预措施可降低催产素静滴引产产妇剖宫产率,护理效果好。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of psychological nursing intervention in the application of oxytocin intravenous infusion of induced labor. Methods: 80 pregnant women with oxytocin induced abortion indications from January 2015 to March 2016 in our hospital were randomly divided into psychological nursing group and control group with each group of 40 cases. Pregnant women in the control group were used routine basic nursing measure, while pregnant women in the psychological nursing group were used by psychological nursing intervention based on targeted nursing based on the control group. The amount of bleeding, mode of delivery, cesarean section, nursing satisfaction, labor time, delivery of pregnant women in two groups were compared. Results: The rate of vaginal delivery in the psychological nursing group was 90.0%, higher than that in the control group (70.0%) and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 5.000, p = 0.025). Compared to the control group, pregnant women in the psychological nursing group had lower rate of unbearable pain caused by uterine contraction (χ2 = 4.114, p = 0.043). The very satisfactory, total satisfaction in the psychological nursing group were 75.0%, 92.5%, higher than those in the control group (52.5%, 80.0%) and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 4.381, 5.541; p = 0.036, 0.019). Compared to the control group, pregnant women in the psychological nursing group had shorter labor time and less amount of bleeding after delivery (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The psychological nursing intervention can reduce the cesarean section rate, and the nursing effect is good.
文章引用:李中朝. 催产素静滴引产产妇的心理护理干预措施分析[J]. 护理学, 2018, 7(4): 168-172. https://doi.org/10.12677/NS.2018.74031

参考文献

[1] 陈立群, 余贵意, 徐名芝, 等. 初产妇人工破膜后乳头刺激引产的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2011, 18(12): 50-51.
[2] Vintzileos, A.M. and Ananth, C.V. (2014) Does Augmentation or Induction of Labor with Oxytocin Increase the Risk for Autism? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 210, 502-504.
[3] 俞春蕾. 护理干预对妊娠晚期静脉滴注催产素引产效果的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2013, 19(17): 2053-2054.
[4] 于群, 盖淑坤. 普贝生在足月妊娠引产中的应用与护理[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2013, 19(18): 99-101.
[5] Koc, O., Duran, B., Ozdemirci, S., et al. (2013) Oxytocin versus Sustained-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Pessary for Labor Induction of Unfavorable Cervix with Bishop Score ≥ 4 and ≤ 6: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BJOG: An In-ternational Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 39, 790-798.
[6] 贺晓红, 陈浪, 徐海燕, 等. 心理干预联合健康教育对胎死宫内引产初产妇的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2013, 19(14): 102-103.
[7] 袁娟书, 杨桂云. 欣普贝生在足月引产产妇的临床应用效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2014, 12(7): 1901-1902.
[8] Akay, N.Ö., Hızlı, D., Yılmaz, S.S, et al. (2012) Comparison of Low-Dose Oxytocin and Dinoprostone for Labor Induction in Postterm Pregnancies: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 73, 242-247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Roloff, K., Peng, S., Sanchez-Ramos, L., et al. (2015) Cumulative Oxytocin Dose during Induction of Labor According to Maternal Body Mass Index. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 131, 54-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 刘树金. 情志护理干预联合催产素用于妊娠晚期引产62例[J]. 中国药业, 2015, 9(5): 88-89.
[11] 厉跃红. 地诺前列酮栓与催生素用于妊娠足月引产的疗效观察[J]. 上海护理, 2011, 11(5): 23-26.
[12] 孔良娣, 邢红岩. 催产素引产700例分析[J]. 中国误诊学杂志, 2011, 11(24): 5922.
[13] Grimm, B., Wilson-Liverman, A. and Bennett, K. (2015) 776: Randomized Comparison of Misoprostol and Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Multiparous Women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 212, S376-S376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 吕霜红. 地诺前列酮栓内置阴道后穹隆与催产素静脉滴注用于足月妊娠引产的临床对照研究[J]. 中国药业, 2013, 22(10): 29-30.
[15] 唐兰梅. 心理护理及用药护理在静脉滴注催产素引产中的应用效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2013, 32(8): 1778-1780.
[16] Diven, L., Gogle, J., Eid, S., et al. (2012) 301: Induction of Labor with Oxy-tocin: Should Oxytocin Be Held? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 206, S144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef